Skip to main content

Effective EMI Reductıon in Medical Devices and Automotive Power Converters

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Communication, Computing and Electronics Systems

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 977))

  • 522 Accesses

Abstract

Advanced automotive electronic-control technology has led to added electronic equipment in the vehicle. Frequencies and power have gradually increased in the vehicle, creating a denser atmosphere of electromagnetic waves. The automotive components tend to produce Electromagnetic Interference (EMI). This will greatly contribute to EMI in the vehicle, thus disturbing electrical/electronic equipment and possibly damaging electrical/electronic components. Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) monitor your heart rate with a battery-powered device placed under the skin. ICD is connected to heart using thin wires. An electric shock will be delivered if it detects an abnormal heart rhythm if your heart is wildly beating and too fast. These medical devices tend to malfunction when they are exposed to high levels of EMI radiation. Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) regulations must be met by the automotive industry and individual vehicle manufacturers. Regulatory compliance to EMC standards and CISPR 25 for automotive application circuits must be met which are not achieved under certain circumstances. For medical devices like ICDS CISPR 22 standards must be met. The radiation from EMI is capable of causing pacemaker or ICD malfunctions, ICDs to send shocks that aren’t needed, and EMI can interfere with PA sensor readings. Here, two types of filtering techniques have been designed in order to mitigate the CM noise which affects performance of Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC). The results were compared, and the effective filtering solution is identified to reduce the conducted emission due to common-mode noise for the range of frequency from 150 kHz to 18 GHz according to the standard. As per EMC standard CISPR 22, the RF inductor is depicted and investigated within 150 kHz–30 MHz frequency range. The capacitive and parasitic impedance are calculated and used in the simulation process. This allows us to reduce the noise by as much as 30 dB which is an efficient noise reduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bajwa A (2020) EMC/EMI challenges for the connected car. Automotive design, telecom, article

    Google Scholar 

  2. Paul CR, Hardin KB (1988) Diagnosis and reduction of conducted noise emissions. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 30:19–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEMC.1988.14080

  3. Kaires RG (2000) The correlation between common mode currents and radiated emissions. In: IEEE international symposium on electromagnetic compatibility, symposium record (Cat. No. 00CH37016), vol 1, pp 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEMC.2000.875552

  4. Bishnoi H, Baisden AC, Mattavelli P et al. (2012) Analysis of EMI terminal modeling of switched power converters. IEEE Trans Power Electron 27(9):3924–3933

    Google Scholar 

  5. Laour M, Tahmi R, Vollaire C (2017) Modeling and analysis of conducted and radiated emissions due to common mode current of a buck converter. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 59(4):1260–1267. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEMC.2017.2651984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Park SH, Huynh HA, Kim S (2015) Analysis of EMI reduction methods of DC-DC buck converter. In: 10th International workshop on the electromagnetic compatibility of integrated circuits (EMC Compo), pp 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMCCompo.2015.7358337

  7. Makarenko VV, Pilinsky VV, Gurin VK (2022) The DC-DC converters EMI filters calculation method using LTspice. Tekhnichna Elektrodynamika 35–42. https://doi.org/10.15407/techned2022.02.035

  8. Abinaya AB, Magdaline SA (2017) Design and analysis of line impedance stabilization network using RLC components for ITE. In: 2017 International conference on innovations in information, embedded and communication systems (ICIIECS), pp 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIIECS.2017.8275974

  9. Nagrial M, Hellany A (1999) EMI/EMC issues in switch mode power supplies (SMPS). In: EMC York 99 international conference and exhibition, pp 180–185. https://doi.org/10.1049/cp:19990266

  10. Kam KW, Pommerenke D, Lam CW, Steinfeld R (2008) EMI analysis methods for synchronous buck converter EMI root cause analysis. In: 2008 IEEE international symposium on electromagnetic compatibility, pp 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEMC.2008.4652125

  11. Wang S, Maillet YY, Wang F, Lai R, Luo F, Boroyevich D (2010) Parasitic effects of grounding paths on common-mode EMI filter’s performance in power electronics systems. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 57(9):3050–3059. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2009.2037643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jia J (2015) Current scan methods to predict radiated emissions of automotive components according to CISPR 25. https://doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-7441

  13. Wang S, Wyk J, Lee FCY (2008) Effects of interactions between filter parasitics and power interconnects on EMI filter performance. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 54:3344–3352. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2007.906126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Harlacher BL, Tran M, Stewart RW (2002) CISPR 22 conducted common mode emissions: a discussion on the effect of Balun quality on the calibration of impedance stabilization networks (ISNs). Pain Manage Nurs 1:12–15. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEMC.2002.1032439

  15. Von Olshausen G, Rondak IC, Lennerz C, Semmler V, Grebmer C, Reents T, Ammar-Busch S, Buiatti A, Bourier F, Deisenhofer I, Kolb C (2016) Electromagnetic interference in implantable cardioverter defibrillators: present but rare. Clin Res Cardiol 105(8):657–665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-016-0965-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Grobler I, Gitau MN (2015) Conducted EMC modeling for accreditation in DC-DC converters. In: IEEE IECON. IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Yokohama, 9–12 Nov 2015, pp 2329–2335

    Google Scholar 

  17. Weens Y, Idhir N, Bausiere R, Franchaud JJ (2006) Modeling and simulation of unshielded and shielded energy cables in frequency and time domains. IEEE Trans Magn 42(7):1876–1882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhou Y, Zhu Y, Song Q, Jin Z, Yang D, Yu X (2011) Prediction and reduction of electromagnetic conducted emission in active clamp forward converter. In: 2011 IEEE international symposium on electromagnetic compatibility. Long Beach, USA, 14–19 Aug 2011, pp 729–733

    Google Scholar 

  19. Keiser B (1987) Principles of electromagnetic compatibility. Artech House

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stephens L (2009) Understanding EMI reduction techniques, vol 53, pp 18–19

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shirley DRA, Sasipriya S (2022) Design and analysis of a RF inductor filter for EMI suppression in an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). IEEE Trans Power Electron

    Google Scholar 

  22. Adam EEE, Babikir E (2021) Survey on medical imaging of electrical impedance tomography (EIT) by variable current pattern methods. J ISMAC 3(02):82–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Smys S, Wang H (2019) Enhanced wireless power transfer system for implantable medical devices. J Electr Eng Autom 1(1):41–49

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shirley DRA, Sasipriya S, Sibi T, Ragul B, Praveen S (2022) Reduction of electromagnetic interference using EMI filter in a buck converter. In: Proceedings of international conference on electronic circuits and signalling technologies (ICECST 2022)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Amin A, Mannan TI, Choi S (2021) Common mode EMI analysis in power electronics enabled power system. In: IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), pp 3537–3544. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECCE47101.2021.9595537

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Sruthi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sasipriya, S., Ruth Anita Shirley, D., Rincy, A.R., Sruthi, S., Yazhini, K. (2023). Effective EMI Reductıon in Medical Devices and Automotive Power Converters. In: Bindhu, V., Tavares, J.M.R.S., Vuppalapati, C. (eds) Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Communication, Computing and Electronics Systems . Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 977. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7753-4_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7753-4_38

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-7752-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-7753-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics