Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Relationship Among Corporate Social Responsibility, Network Cooperation, Green Innovation, Environmental Performance and Firm Performance: Evidences in Viet Nam

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Current Issues in Public Utilities and Public Policy

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the relationships between corporate social responsibility (CSR), network cooperation, green innovation and performance. Therefore, the study tries to build the holistic model to illustrate this relationship. The study employs a unique dataset from 221 managers of tourism firms in the Central Vietnam to test the relationships among CSR, network cooperation, green innovation their impacts on environmental performance and firm performance. The results show that CSR components (economic, legal, philanthropic and environmental) have a positive impact on network cooperation, environmental performance and firm performance, in turn network cooperation has a positive impact on green innovation and firm performance. This study extends the review of CSR, network cooperation and green innovation in determining environmental performance and firm performance in the tourism sector. The findings of this study serve as a bridge among regulators, businessmen and academics to model the corporate social responsibility and innovation initiatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abu Seman, N. A., Govindan, K., Mardani, A., Zakuan, N., Mat Saman, M. Z., Hooker, R. E., & Ozkul, S. (2019). The mediating effect of green innovation on the relationship between green supply chain management and environmental performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 115–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmad, N., Ullah, Z., Arshad, M. Z., Kamran, H. Waqas, Scholz, M., & Han, H. (2021). Relationship between corporate social responsibility at the micro-level and environmental performance: The mediating role of employee pro-environmental behavior and the moderating role of gender. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1138–1148.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alarcón, S., & Sánchez, M. (2013). External and internal R&D, capital investment and business performance in the Spanish agri-food industry. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64(3), 654–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alhadid, A. Y., & Abu-Ruman, A. H. (2014). The Impact of green innovation on organizational performance, environmental management behavior as a moderate variable: An analytical study on Nuqul group in Jordan. International Journal of Business and Management, 9(7), 51–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson, J. C., & Narus, J. A. (1990). A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 42–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Arendt, S., & Brettel, M. (2010). Understanding the influence of corporate social responsibility on corporate identity, image, and firm performance. Management Decision, 48(10), 1469–1492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Babiak, K., & Trendafilova, S. (2011). CSR and environmental responsibility: Motives and pressures to adopt green management practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18(1), 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2008). Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(12), 1325–1343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. University of Iowa Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brioschi, F., Brioschi, M. S., & Cainelli, G. (2002). From the industrial district to the district group: An insight into the evolution of local capitalism in Italy. Regional Studies, 36(9), 1037–1052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Broadstock, D. C., Roman, M., Martin, M., & Nickolaos, G. T. (2019). Does corporate social responsibility impact firms’ innovation capacity? The indirect link between environmental and social governance implementation and innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 119, 99–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Byun, S. K., & Oh, J. M. (2018). Local corporate social responsibility, media coverage, and shareholder value. Journal of Banking and Finance, 87, 68–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Calvo-Mora, A., Domínguez, C. C. M., & Criado, F. (2018). Assessment and improvement of organizational social impact through the EFQM excellence model. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 29(11/12), 1259–1278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chadha, A. (2011). Overcoming competence lock-in for the development of radical eco-innovations: The case of biopolymer technology. Industry and Innovation, 18(3), 335–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chandler, D. (2019). Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility: Sustainable Value Creation. SAGE Publications, Incorporated.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chen, Y.-S., Lai, S.-B., & Wen, C.-T. (2006). The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), 331–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen, Y., Tang, G., Jin, J., Li, J., & Paillé, P. (2015). Linking market orientation and environmental performance: The influence of environmental strategy, employee’s environmental involvement, and environmental product quality. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 479–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cherrington, D. J. (1989). Organizational behavior: The management of individual and organizational performance. Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chiou, T.-Y., Chan, H. K., Lettice, F., & Chung, S. H. (2011). The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(6), 822–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cornett, M. M., Erhemjamts, O., & Tehranian, H. (2016). Greed or good deeds: An examination of the relation between corporate social responsibility and the financial performance of U.S. commercial banks around the financial crisis. Journal of Banking and Finance, 70, 137–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cowan, K., & Guzman, F. (2020). How CSR reputation, sustainability signals, and country-of-origin sustainability reputation contribute to corporate brand performance: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Research, 117, 683–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1992). A behavioral theory of the firm. (2nd edn.). Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dangelico, R. M., Pontrandolfo, P., & Pujari, D. (2013). Developing sustainable new products in the textile and upholstered furniture industries: Role of external integrative capabilities. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(4), 642–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dangelico, R. M. (2016). Green product innovation: Where we are and where we are going. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25, 560–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dezi, L., Ferraris, A., Papa, A., & Vrontis, D. (2019). The role of external embeddedness and knowledge management as antecedents of ambidexterity and performances in Italian SMEs. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68(2), 360–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Diez, J. D. (2000). Innovative networks in manufacturing: Some empirical evidence from the metropolitan area of Barcelona. Technovation, 20(3), 139–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Diez-Martinez, I., Peiro-Signes, A., & Segarra-Oña, M. (2022). The links between active cooperation and eco-innovation orientation of firms: A multi-analysis study. Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Dingler, A., & Enkel, E. (2016). Socialization and innovation: Insights from collaboration across industry boundaries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 109, 50–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Draghici, A., Izvercianu, M., Vartolomei, M., & Duran, V. (2009). Research on eco-business training requirements. Environmental Engineering & Management Journal, 8(4), 709–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Dredge, D. (2006). Policy networks and the local organisation of tourism. Tourism Management, 27(2), 269–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Driessen, P.H., Hillebrand, B., Kok, R.A., Verhallen, T.M. (2013). Green new product development: the pivotal role of product greenness. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 60(2), 315–326.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., & Ali, S. S. (2015). Exploring the relationship between leadership, operational practices, institutional pressures and environmental performance: A framework for green supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 160, 120–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Eiadat, Y., Kelly, A., Roche, F., & Eyadat, H. (2008). Green and competitive? An empirical test of the mediating role of environmental innovation strategy. Journal of World Business, 43(2), 131–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Fabrizi, A., Guarini, G., & Meliciani, V. (2018). Green patents, regulatory policies and research network policies. Research Policy, 47(6), 1018–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Fujii, H., Iwata, K., Kaneko, S., & Managi, S. (2013). Corporate environmental and economic performance of japanese manufacturing firms: Empirical study for sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(3), 187–201.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1/2), 51–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ghisetti, C., & Quatraro, F. (2017). Green technologies and environmental productivity: A cross-sectoral analysis of direct and indirect effects in Italian regions. Ecological Economics, 132, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Graessley, S., Horak, J., Kovacova, M., Valaskova, K., & Poliak, M. (2019). Consumer attitudes and behaviors in the technology-driven sharing economy: Motivations for participating in collaborative consumption. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 7(1), 25–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Gronum, S., Verreynne, M. L., & Kastelle, T. (2012). The role of networks in small and medium-sized enterprise innovation and firm performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(2), 257–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2018). Multivariate data analysis (8th edn.). Cengage India.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hardy, C., Phillips, N., & Lawrence, T. B. (2003). Resources, knowledge and influence: The organizational effects of interorganizational collaboration. Journal of Management Studies, 40(2), 321–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hart, S. L., & Sharma, S. (2004). Engaging fringe stakeholders for competitive imagination. Academy of Management Perspectives, 18(1), 7–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Henri, J.-F., & Journeault, M. (2010). Eco-control: The influence of management control systems on environmental and economic performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Hou, T. C. T. (2019). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and sustainable financial performance: Firm‐level evidence from Taiwan. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(1), 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Jansen, J. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661–1674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Jiang, X., Liu, H., Fey, C., & Jiang, F. (2018). Entrepreneurial orientation, network resource acquisition, and firm performance: A network approach. Journal of Business Research, 87, 46–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Jones, T. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20, 404–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Kaminski, P. C., de Oliveira, A. C., & Lopes, T. M. (2008). Knowledge transfer in product development processes: A case study in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) of the metal-mechanic sector from Sao Paulo, Brazil. Technovation, 28(1–2), 29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Khan, M. A. S., Jianguo, D., Ali, M., Saleem, S., & Usman, M. (2019). Interrelations between ethical leadership, green psychological climate, and organizational environmental citizenship behavior: A moderated mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Keh, H. T., Nguyen, T. T. M., & Ng, H. P. (2007). The effects of entrepreneurial orientation and marketing information on the performance of SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 592–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Klassen, R. D., & Whybark, D. C. (1999). The impact of environmental technologies on manufacturing performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 599–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Kowalska, K. (2016). Network organizations and corporate social responsibility. Oeconomia Copernicana, 7(4), 653–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Kraus, S., Rehman, S. U., & García, F. J. S. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and environmental performance: The mediating role of environmental strategy and green innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 160, 120262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Laczniak, G. R., & Murphy, P. E. (1991). Fostering ethical marketing decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(4), 259–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Lebas, M., & Euske, K. (2002) A conceptual and operational delineation of performance. Business Performance Measurement: Theory and Practice, 65–79.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Lee, K.-H., & Min, B. (2015). Green R&D for eco-innovation and its impact on carbon emissions and firm performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 534–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Lee, J. W., Young, M. K., & Young, E. K. (2018). Antecedents of adopting corporate environmental responsibility and green practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 148, 397–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Lin, C. H., Yang, H. L., & Liou, D. Y. (2009). The impact of corporate social responsibility on financial performance: Evidence from business in Taiwan. Technology in Society, 31(1), 56–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Lin, R.-J., Chen, R.-H., & Huang, F.-H. (2014). Green innovation in the automobile industry. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 114(6), 886–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Lin, R.-J., Tan, K.-H., & Geng, Y. (2013). Market demand, green product innovation, and firm performance: Evidence from Vietnam motorcycle industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 40, 101–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Madueno, J. H., Jorge, M. L., Conesa, I. M., & Martínez-Martínez, D. (2016). Relationship between corporate social responsibility and competitive performance in Spanish SMEs: Empirical evidence from a stakeholders’ perspective. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 19(1), 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Mancinelli, S., & Mazzanti, M. (2008). Innovation, networking and complementarity. Evidence on SME performances for a local economic system in North-Eastern Italy. Annals of Regional Science, 43, 567–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Marti, C. P., Rovira-Val, M. R., & Drescher, L. G. J. (2015). Are firms that contribute to sustainable development better financially? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22, 305–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Martínez-Ferrero, J., & Frías-Aceituno, J. V. (2015). Relationship between sustainable development and financial performance: International empirical research. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24, 20–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Mendes, T., Braga, V., Correia, A., & Silva, C. (2021). Linking corporate social responsibility, cooperation and innovation: the triple bottom line perspective. Innovation & Management Review, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Montabon, F., Sroufe, R., & Narasimhan, R. (2007). An examination of corporate reporting, environmental management practices and firm performance. Journal of Operation Management, 25(5), 998–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Mu, J., Peng, G., & MacLachlan, D. L. (2009). Effect of risk management strategy on NPD performance. Technovation, 29(3), 170–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Nazari, J. A., Hrazdil, K., & Mahmoudian, F. (2017). Assessing social and environmental performance through narrative complexity in CSR reports. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 13(2), 166–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Nguyen, N. P. (2011). Applying theory of reasoned action to explain inter-firm cooperation: Empirical evidence from Vietnamese enterprises. International Journal of Management & Information Systems, 15(3), 61–81.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Nguyen, P.-M., Vo, N. D., Nguyen, N. P., & Choo, Y. (2020). Corporate social responsibilities of food processing companies in Vietnam from consumer perspective. Sustainability, 12(1), 71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Nguyen, N. P., & McGuirk, H. (2022). Evaluating the effect of multifactors on employee’s innovative behavior in SMEs: mediating effects of thriving at work and organizational commitment. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Nieto, M. J., & Santamaría, L. (2007). The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation. Technovation, 27(6–7), 367–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Novitasari, M., & Tarigan, Z. J. H. (2022). The role of green innovation in the effect of corporate social responsibility on firm performance. Economies, 10, 117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Oliver, C. (1990). Determinants of interorganizational relationships: Integration and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 241–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Orlitzky, M., Siegel, D. S., & Waldman, D. A. (2011). Strategic corporate social responsibility and environmental sustainability. Business and Society, 50(1), 6–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Park, S. J., Choi, S., & Kim, E. J. (2012). The relationships between socio-demographic variables and concerns about environmental sustainability. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19(6), 343–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Pavlovich, K. (2003). The evolution and transformation of a tourism destination network: The Waitomo Caves, New Zealand. Tourism Management, 24(2), 203–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Pechlaner, H., & Volgger, M. (2012). How to promote cooperation in the hospitality industry: Generating practitioner relevant knowledge using the GABEK qualitative research strategy. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 24(6), 925–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Petruzzelli, A. M., Dangelico, R. M., Rotolo, D., & Albino, V. (2011). Organizational factors and technological features in the development of green innovations: Evidence from patent analysis. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 13, 291–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Preston, L. E., & O’bannon, D. P. (1997). The corporate social-financial performance relationship: A typology and analysis. Business & Society, 36(4), 419–429.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Pujari, D. (2006). Eco-innovation and new product development: Understanding the influences on market performance. Technovation, 26(1), 76–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Rehman, S. U., Kraus, S., Shah, S. A., Khanin, D., & Mahto, R. V. (2021). Analyzing the relationship between green innovation and environmental performance in large manufacturing firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163, 120481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Rettab, B., Brik, A. B., & Mellahi, K. (2009). A study of management perceptions of the impact of corporate social responsibility on organizational performance in emerging economies: The case of Dubai. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(3), 371–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Sarstedt, M., & Cheah, J.-H. (2019). Partial least squares structural equation modeling using SmartPLS: A software review. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 7, 196–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Seitanidi, M. M., & Crane, A. (2009). Implementing CSR through partnerships: Understanding the selection, design and institutionalisation of nonprofit-business partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2), 413–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Shabbir, M. S., & Wisdom, O. (2020). The relationship between corporate social responsibility, environmental investments and financial performance: Evidence from manufacturing companies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 39946–39957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Shahzad, M., Ying, Q., Saad, A. J., Abaid, U. Z., & Saif, U. R. (2020). Relation of environment sustainability to CSR and green innovation: A case of Pakistani manufacturing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 253, 119938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Sidhoum, A. A., & Serra, T. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and dimensions of performance: An application to U.S. electric utilities. Utilities Policy, 48, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Singh, R., Sukumar, A., Chandrashekar, D., Hillemane, B. S. M., & Jafari-Sadeghi, V. (2022). Network cooperation and economic performance of SMEs: Direct and mediating impacts of innovation and internationalization. Journal of Business Research, 148, 116–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Sprinkle, G. B., & Maines, L. A. (2010). The benefits and costs of corporate social responsibility. Business Horizons, 53(5), 445–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Su, X., Xu, A., Lin, W., Chen, Y., Liu, S., & Xu, W. (2020). Environmental leadership, green innovation practices, environmental knowledge learning, and firm performance. SAGE Open, 10(2), 215824402092290.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Suganthi, L. (2020). Investigating the relationship between corporate social responsibility and market, cost and environmental performance for sustainable business, South African. Journal of Business Management, 51(1), a1630.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Surroca, J., Tribó, J. A., & Waddock, S. (2010). Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 463–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Tang, M., Walsh, G., Lerner, D., Fitza, M. A., & Li, Q. (2018). Green innovation, managerial concern and firm performance: An empirical study. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(1), 39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Torres, A., Bijmolt, T. H., Tribó, J. A., & Verhoef, P. (2012). Generating global brand equity through corporate social responsibility to key stakeholders. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(1), 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Verboncu, I., & Zalman, M. (2005). Management şi performanţe. Editura Universitară.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Waddock, S., & Smith, N. (2000). Relationships: The real challenge of corporate global citizenship. Business & Society Review, 105(1), 47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Wahba, H. (2008). Does the market value corporate environmental responsibility? An empirical examination. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(2), 89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Wang, H., Khan, M. A. S., Anwar, F., Shahzad, F., Adu, D., & Murad, M. (2021). Green innovation practices and its impacts on environmental and organizational performance. Frontier in Psychology, 11, 553625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Weng, H.-H.R., Chen, J.-S., & Chen, P.-C. (2015). Effects of green innovation on environmental and corporate performance: A stakeholder perspective. Sustainability, 7(5), 4997–5026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS quarterly, 133(1), 177–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Wong, S. K. S. (2013). Environmental requirements, knowledge sharing and green innovation: Empirical evidence from the electronics industry in China. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(5), 321–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Yao, Y., Gao, H., & Sun, F. (2020). The impact of dual network structure on firm performance: The moderating effect of innovation strategy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(9), 1020–1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Yan, X., & Zhang, Y. (2021). The effects of green innovation and environmental management on the environmental performance and value of a firm: An empirical study of energy-intensive listed companies in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(27), 35870–35879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Zeng, S. X., Xie, X. M., & Tam, C. M. (2010). Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs. Technovation, 30(3), 181–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Zhang, D., Rong, Z., & Ji, Q. (2019). Green innovation and firm performance: Evidence from listed companies in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 144, 48–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Zhu, Q., Geng, Y., Fujita, T., & Hashimoto, S. (2010). Green supply chain management in leading manufacturers: Case studies in Japanese large companies. Management Research Review, 33(4), 380–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Business Administration, University of Economics, The University of Danang, 71 Ngu Hanh Son Street, Da Nang City, 550000, Vietnam

    Nguyen Phuc Nguyen

  2. Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City, Campus in Quang Ngai, 938 Quang Trung Street, Quang Ngai city, Quang Ngai Province, Vietnam

    Hoang Anh Vien

Authors
  1. Nguyen Phuc Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hoang Anh Vien
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nguyen Phuc Nguyen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of Business Administration, Kobe Universtiy, Kobe, Japan

    Fumitoshi Mizutani

  2. Faculty of Business Administration, Kindai University, Higashiosaka City, Osaka, Japan

    Takuya Urakami

  3. Graduate School of Business Administration, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan

    Eri Nakamura

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nguyen, N.P., Vien, H.A. (2023). The Relationship Among Corporate Social Responsibility, Network Cooperation, Green Innovation, Environmental Performance and Firm Performance: Evidences in Viet Nam. In: Mizutani, F., Urakami, T., Nakamura, E. (eds) Current Issues in Public Utilities and Public Policy. Kobe University Monograph Series in Social Science Research. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7489-2_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7489-2_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-7488-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-7489-2

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation