Abstract
The paper provides a brief introduction to the new economic model of the Russian macroregion called the model of sustainable development of the Russian economy. It is a regional sustainable development model that incorporates the main characteristics of the BRICS economy to analyze the impact of monetary policy measures and forecasting. The model of sustainable development is built on the logic of neo-Keynesian models with real and nominal rigidity. It also considers the structure of a small open economy, external (relative to the region) monetary conditions, and other factors necessary to consider the features of the BRICS economy. The model is evaluated using Bayesian methods using the data from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, the Energy Information Administration, the Federal Reserve Economic Data, the Food and Agriculture Organization based on international statistics, information from the Federal State Statistics Service of the Russian Federation (Rosstat), and the Bank of Russia for Q1 2009–Q4 2020. In addition to describing the properties of the model, the authors show the model’s potential by decomposing historic and forecast data. The model allows analyzing changes in the indicators of the BRICS economy as a whole and a separate macroregion and therefore, is a valuable tool for macroeconomic analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Khatun, R., Banik, A., & Bhaumik, P. K. (2021). Measuring the barriers to trade in financial services in BRICS economies: Commitments and current practices under the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS). Global Business Review, 22(5), 1160–1173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150919830796
Conti, B., Van, N., & Welle, A. (2020). Brazilian economy: From euphoria to crisis (2003–2018). In V. Ipek & E. I. Akarçay (Eds.), To democratize or not? Trials and tribulations in the postcolonial world (pp. 193–231). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Vasiliev, D. V., Shcherbakova, A. V., & Shcherbakov, D. A. (2020). Brazilian-Chinese economic cooperation in the context of the trade war between China and the United States. Latin America, 12, 26–36. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044748X0012275-1
OECD. (2018). Economic Outlook for Southeast Asia, China and India 2019: Towards smart urban transportation. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/development/economic-outlook-for-southeast-asia-china-and-india-2019_saeo-2019-en. Accessed 28 April 2022.
Novator. (2018, February 13). India is suffering from unemployment, while more than 400 thousand vacancies remain in the Indian public sector. Retrieved from https://novator.io/novosti/indiya-stradaet-ot-bezrabotitsy-pri-etom-v-indijskom-gossektore-ostayotsya-bolee-400-tys-vakansij. Accessed 18 April 2022.
World Bank Database. (1994–2020). Share of youth not in education, employment or training, female (% of female youth population). Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.UEM.NEET.FE.ZS?locations=IN&view=chart. Accessed 12 April 2022.
Akhmadulina, T. V., & Raspopov, V. M. (2020). Challenges of the economic development of the Republic of India. Electronic Scientific Journal Vector of Economics, 6(48).
International Monetary Fund. Asia and Pacific Dept. (2021, January 8). People’s Republic of China staff report for the 2020 Article IV Consultation (Country Report No. 2021/006). Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/CR/Issues/2021/01/06/Peoples-Republic-of-China-2020-Article-IV-Consultation-Press-Release-Staff-Report-and-49992. Accessed 28 April 2022.
World Bank. (2020). From recovery to rebalancing: China’s economy in 2021. https://doi.org/10.1596/35014
Reshetnikova, M. S., & Pugacheva, I. A. (2021). What’s happening to the locomotive of global economy, or The myths about the recovery of China. RUDN Journal of Economics, 29(3), 575–586. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2329-2021-29-3-575-586
Andriyanova, M. V. (Ed.). (2021). Analysis of logistics potential of BRICS. Center for Ethnic and International Studies, Archont.
Christiano, L., Eichenbaum, M., & Evans, C. L. (2005). Nominal rigidities and the dynamic effects of a shock to monetary policy. Journal of Political Economics, 113(1), 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1086/426038
Galí, J. (2008). Monetary policy, inflation and the business cycle: An introduction to the New Keynesian framework. Princeton University Press.
Smets, F., & Wouters, R. (2003). An estimated stochastic dynamic general equilibrium model of the euro area. Journal of European Economy Association, 1(5), 1123–1175. Retrieved from https://statmath.wu.ac.at/~hauser/LVs/SE_MacroEconometrics/DSGE/SmetsWouters2003JEuEcoAss_DSGE.pdf. Accessed 28 April 2022.
Woodford, M. (2003). Foundations of a theory of monetary policy. Princeton University Press.
An, S., & Schorfheide, F. (2006). Bayesian analysis of DSGE models—Rejoinder. Economic Review, 26(2–4), 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474930701220246
Burriel, P., Fernández-Villaverde, J., & Rubio-Ramírez, J. (2010). MEDEA: A DSGE model for the Spanish econom. SERIEs: Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, 1(1), 175–243.
Canova, F., & Sala, L. (2006). Back to square one: Identification issues in DSGE models. ECB Working Paper No. 583. Retrieved from https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp583.pdf. Accessed 28 April 2022.
Iskrev, N. (2008). How much do we learn from the estimation of DSGE models? A case study of identification issues in a New Keynesian business cycle model. University of Michigan.
Fernández-Villaverde, J., & Rubio-Ramírez, J. (2004). Comparing dynamic equilibrium models to data: A Bayesian approach. Journal of Economics, 123, 153–187.
Christoffel, K., Coenen, G., & Warne, A. (2007). Conditional versus unconditional forecasting with the New Area-Wide Model of the Euro area. Retrieved from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/76759/1/Christoffel%20Coenen%20Warne%20Jul2007.pdf. Accessed 28 April 2022.
Edge, R., Kiley, M. T., & Laforte, J. P. (2009). A comparison of forecast performance between Federal Reserve Staff Forecasts, simple reduced-form models, and a DSGE model. Finance and Economics Discussion Series Divisions of Research & Statistics and Monetary Affairs Federal Reserve Board.
Boyko, V., Kislyak, N., Nikitin, M., & Oborin, O. (2020). Methods for estimating the gross regional product leading indicator. Russian Journal of Money and Finance, 79(3), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.31477/rjmf.202003.03
Acknowledgements
This paper has been supported by the RUDN University Strategic Academic Leadership Program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chupin, A.L., Chupina, Z.S., Moshlyak, G.A., Sorokin, A.M., Dobromirov, D.D. (2023). MoSER: Sustainable Development Model for the Russian Macroregion. In: Makarenko, E.N., Vovchenko, N.G., Tishchenko, E.N. (eds) Technological Trends in the AI Economy. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 625. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7411-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7411-3_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-7410-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-7411-3
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)