Skip to main content

Agreement and MOU: Ethical and Legal Aspects of Funding for Healthcare Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Grant writing for medical and healthcare professionals

Abstract

As far as the perspective frontiers of research in the realms of health care are concerned, the individuals, families, other stakeholders, organizations, nodal institutions, and communities occupy the center stage. Hence, it is in the fitness of things that whenever the considerations of funding for health services (care) research are taken into due account, the aforementioned perspective frontiers of research should necessarily encompass ethical and legal aspects of funding. These need to be clearly delineated while effecting an agreement or MoU. The current chapter provides an overview of ethical and legal aspects of funding for health care research pertaining to agreement or MoU.

Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do

Potter Stewart

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Srinivasan K, Fredrick J, Gupta R, Singh N. Funding opportunities for health research in India—a technical scan. Indian J Public Health. 2020;64(4):421–4. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijph.IJPH_9_20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dako-Gyeke P, Asampong E, Afari E, Launois P, Ackumey M, Opoku-Mensah K, Dery S, Akweongo P, Nonvignon J, Aikins M. Capacity building for implementation research: a methodology for advancing health research and practice. Health Res Policy Syst. 2020;18(1):53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-020-00568-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cartier Y, Creatore MI, Hoffman SJ, Potvin L. Priority-setting in public health research funding organisations: an exploratory qualitative study among five high-profile funders. Health Res Policy Syst. 2018;16(1):53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0335-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. van der Graaf P, Blank L, Holding E, Goyder E. What makes a ‘successful’ collaborative research project between public health practitioners and academics? A mixed-method review of funding applications submitted to a local intervention evaluation scheme. Health Res Policy Syst. 2021;19(1):9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-020-00671-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhutta ZA. Ethics in international health research: a perspective from the developing world. Bull World Health Organ. 2002;80(2):114–20.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Frith L. Why health services research needs bioethics. J Med Ethics. 2017;43(10):655–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2017-104247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Liaw ST, Tam CW. Research ethics and approval process: a guide for new GP researchers. Aust Fam Physician. 2015;44(6):419–22.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bosch-Capblanch X, Abba K, Prictor M, Garner P. Contracts between patients and healthcare practitioners for improving patients’ adherence to treatment, prevention and health promotion activities. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;2007(2):CD004808. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004808.pub3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lorente R, Antonanzas F, Rodriguez-Ibeas R. Implementation of risk-sharing contracts as perceived by Spanish hospital pharmacists. Health Econ Rev. 2019;9:25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-019-0242-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mandal J, Parija M, Parija SC. Ethics of funding of research. Trop Parasitol. 2012;2(2):89–90. https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-5070.105172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mathur R, Swaminathan S. National Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical and Health Research involving human participants, 2017: a commentary. Indian J Med Ethics. 2018;3(3):201–4. https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME11.2018.065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Parks MR, Disis ML. Conflicts of interest in translational research. J Transl Med. 2004;2(1):28. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-2-28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chopra SS. Industry funding of clinical trials: benefit or bias? JAMA. 2003;290:113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Johns MEE, Barnes M, Florencio PS. Restoring balance to industry–academia relationships in an era of institutional financial conflicts of interest. JAMA. 2003;289(6):741–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bekelman JE, Yan LI, Gross CP. Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research. JAMA. 2003;289(4):454–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bonham VH. Chapter 12—Legal issues in clinical research. In: Gallin JI, Ognibene FP, Johnson LL, editors. Principles and practice of clinical research. 4th ed. New York: Academic Press; 2018. p. 161–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-849905-4.00012-5.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. https://www.crc.gov.my/wpcontent/uploads/documents/intranet/GCP/05_Final_Edited_Ethics_Ethical_problems_in_clinical_trial.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Srinivasan, A.R. (2023). Agreement and MOU: Ethical and Legal Aspects of Funding for Healthcare Research. In: Parija, S.C., Kate, V. (eds) Grant writing for medical and healthcare professionals. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7018-4_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics