Skip to main content

A Simulative Analysis of Prominent Unicast Routing Protocols over Multi-hop Wireless Mobile Ad-hoc Networks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of International Conference on Data Science and Applications

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 551))

Abstract

Mobile ad-hoc networks (MANETs) have potential for becoming one of the most widely deployed wireless networks due to the wide spread use of wireless hand-held devices in both personal and professional lives. These networks have various application areas covering from a conference hall to a calamitous area. However, due to mobile nature of the nodes that results in timely varying network topologies, routing the data packets in these networks is a challenging task. In spite of the difficulties, a wide set of unicast routing protocols for MANETs is available in the literature. In this paper, four basic unicast routing protocols such as DSDV, OLSR, DSR, and AODV have been opted because of their popularity. The performance of the chosen routing protocols is evaluated in terms of network performance measuring metrics such as packet delivery ratio, average end-to-end delay, average jitter, throughput, and normalized routing load. Essentially, the routing protocol’s suitability to mobile ad-hoc environments is analyzed for diverse node mobilities under different CBR traffic loads.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AEED:

Average End-to-End Delay

AJ:

Average Jitter

AODV:

Ad-hoc On-demand Distance Vector

BPS:

Bits Per Second

CBR:

Constant Bit Rate

CBRP:

Cluster Based Routing Protocol

DSDV:

Destination Sequenced Distance Vector

DSR:

Dynamic Source Routing

HM:

Half-Minute

HT:

High-Traffic

IEEE:

Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers

LT:

Low-Traffic

M:

Minute

MAC:

Media Access Control

MANETs:

Mobile Ad-hoc Networks

MPRs:

Multi-Point Relays

NP:

No-Pause

NRL:

Normalized Routing Load

OLSR:

Optimized Link State Routing

PAODV:

Pre-emptive AODV

PDR:

Packet Delivery Ratio

QoS:

Quality of Service

RS:

Running-Speeds

RSHM:

Running-Speeds Half-Minute

RSM:

Running-Speeds Minute

RSNP:

Running-Speeds No-Pause

RSS:

Running-Speeds Stationary

RS5M:

Running-Speeds 5-min

S:

Stationary

TC:

Topology Control

TORA:

Temporally Ordered Routing Algorithm

TP:

Throughput

TS:

Tank-Speeds

TSHM:

Tank-Speeds Half-Minute

TSM:

Tank-Speeds Minute

TSNP:

Tank-Speeds No-Pause

TSS:

Tank-Speeds Stationary

TS5M:

Tank-Speeds 5-min

TTL:

Time-To-Live

WS:

Walking-Speeds

WSHM:

Walking-Speeds Half-Minute

WSNP:

Walking-Speeds No-Pause

WSM:

Walking-Speeds Minute

WSS:

Walking-Speeds Stationary

WS5M:

Walking-Speeds 5-min

5M:

5-Minutes

References

  1. Conti M, Giordano S (2014) Mobile ad hoc networking: milestones, challenges, and new research directions. IEEE Commun Mag 52(1):85–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gunaratna G, Jayarathna P, Sandamini S, De Silva D (2015) Implementing wireless ad hoc networks for disaster relief communication. In 8th international conference on Ubi-media computing (UMEDIA). Colombo, Sri Lanka, pp 66–71

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hoebeke J, Moerman I, Dhoedt B, Demeester P (2004) An overview of mobile ad hoc networks: applications and challenges. J Commun Netw 3(3):60–66

    Google Scholar 

  4. Murthy CSR, Manoj BS (2004) Ad hoc wireless networks: architectures and protocols. Portable Doc Pearson Educ

    Google Scholar 

  5. Abolhasan M, Wysocki T, Dutkiewicz E (2004) A review of routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks. Ad Hoc Netw 2(1):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boukerche A, Turgut B, Aydin N, Ahmad MZ, Boloni L, Turgut D (2011) Routing protocols in ad hoc networks: a survey. Comput Netw 55(13):3032–3080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Saini TK, Sharma SC (2019) Prominent unicast routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks: criterion, classification, and key attributes. Ad Hoc Netw 89:58–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. He G (2002) Destination-sequenced distance vector (DSDV) protocol. Networking Laboratory, Helsinki University of Technology, 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jacquet P, Muhlethaler P, Clausen T, Laouiti A, Qayyum A, Viennot L (2001) Optimized link state routing protocol for ad hoc networks. In: IEEE international multi topic conference. IEEE, pp 62–68

    Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson DB, Maltz DA, Broch J (2001) DSR: the dynamic source routing protocol for multi-hop wireless ad hoc networks. Ad hoc Network 5(1):139–172

    Google Scholar 

  11. Perkins CE, Royer EM (1999) Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing. In: Second IEEE workshop on mobile computing systems and applications. IEEE, pp 90–100

    Google Scholar 

  12. Broch J, Maltz DA, Johnson DB, Hu YC, Jetcheva J (1998) A performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad hoc network routing protocols. In: 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on Mobile computing and networking. Dallas, Texas, USA, pp 85–97

    Google Scholar 

  13. Perkins CE, Royer EM, Das SR, Marina MK (2001) Performance comparison of two on-demand routing protocols for ad hoc networks. IEEE Pers Commun 8(1):16–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Clausen T, Jacquet P, Viennot L (2002) Comparative study of routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks. In: Med-hoc-Net. Sardegna, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  15. Boukerche A (2004) Performance evaluation of routing protocols for ad hoc wireless networks. Mobile Networks Appl 9(4):333–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Layuan L, Chunlin L, Peiyan Y (2006) Performance evaluation and simulations of routing protocols in ad hoc networks. Comput Commun 30(8):1890–1898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Katiyar S, Gujral R, Mallick B (2015) Comparative performance analysis of MANET routing protocols in military operation using NS2. In: 2015 international conference on green computing and internet of things (ICGCIoT), pp 603–609

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rao KG, Babu CS, Rao BB, Venkatesulu D (2016) Simulation based performance evaluation of various routing protocols in MANETs. IOSR J Mobile Comput Appl 3(4):23–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Network Simulator 2, http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/

  20. Johnson DB, Broch J, Hu YC, Jetcheva J, Maltz DA (1998) The CMU Monarch project’s wireless and mobility extensions to ns. 42nd Internet Engineering Task Force

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lavanya Poluboyina .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Poluboyina, L., Rao, C.S.V.M., Subba Rao, S.P.V., Prasad Acharya, G. (2023). A Simulative Analysis of Prominent Unicast Routing Protocols over Multi-hop Wireless Mobile Ad-hoc Networks. In: Saraswat, M., Chowdhury, C., Kumar Mandal, C., Gandomi, A.H. (eds) Proceedings of International Conference on Data Science and Applications. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 551. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6631-6_47

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics