Skip to main content

Challenges and Future Perspectives of Low-Power VLSI Circuits: A Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Modern Electronics Devices and Communication Systems

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 948))

Abstract

Low-power technologies, which have taken over the electronics sector, are being studied in this scientific literature. Power dissipation is an important design parameter in VLSI circuits because it predicts the performance of battery-operated devices, which is important in biomedical and communication applications. It gets more difficult to construct high-performance, low-power systems on a chip, as chip size reduces and device density and complexity rise. Furthermore, due to increased design complexity below the 100 nm node, total power management on a device is becoming a severe concern. Leakage current is also important in the power management of low-power VLSI devices. Because leakage and dynamic power consumption account for a large portion of overall power consumption in micro and nanotechnologies, they are becoming more relevant design factors. In order to increase the battery life of portable devices, VLSI circuit design focuses on reducing leakage and dynamic power. The numerous approaches, tactics and power management techniques that may be employed to construct low-power circuit-based systems are addressed in this scientific literature review.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chandrakasan AP, Sheng S, Brodersen RW (1992) Low-power CMOS digital design. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits 27:473–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rabaey J, Pedram M (1996) Introduction. In: Low power design methodologies, 1st edn. Kluwer, New York, pp 5–16

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chandrakasan AP, Mehra R, Potkonjak M, Rabaey J, Brodersen RW (1995) Optimizing power using transformations. In: IEEE transactions On CAD, pp 13–32

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rabaey J, Pedram M (1996) Algorithm and architectural level methodologies. In: Low power design methodologies 1st edn. Kluwer, New York, pp 335–340

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang YX, Lu SL, Mao BQ (2004) A low-power design methodology clock-gating. Microelectron Comput 21:23–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yaman Çakmak I, Toms W, Navaridas J (2016) Cyclic power-gating as an alternative to voltage and frequency scaling. IEEE Comput Archit Lett 15:77–80

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shin I, Kim J-J, Shin Y (2015) Aggressive voltage scaling through fast correction of multiple errors with seamless pipeline operation. In: IEEE transactions on circuits and systems I, vol 62, Issue 2, pp 468–477

    Google Scholar 

  8. Benini L, De Micheli G, Macii E (2002) Designing low-power circuits: practical recipes. In: IEEE circuits and systems magazine, vol 1, pp 6–25

    Google Scholar 

  9. Han J, Member, IEEE, Zhang Y, Huang S, Chen M, Zeng X (2016) An area-efficient error-resilient ultra-low-power subthreshold ECG processor. In: IEEE transactions on circuits and systems-II, vol 2

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chen Z, Shott J, Plummer J (1994) CMOS technology scaling for low voltage low power applications. In: ISLPE-98: IEEE international symposium on low power electronics. San Diego, CA, pp 56–57

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bernstein K, Cavin RK, Porod W, Seabaugh A, Welser J (2010) Device and architecture outlook for beyond CMOS switches. Proc IEEE 98(12):2169–2184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bondyopadhyay PK (2002) Moore’s law governs the silicon revolution. Proc IEEE 88:78–81

    Google Scholar 

  13. Haron NZ, Hamdioui S (2008) Why is CMOS scaling coming to an END? In: Proceedings of the 2008 3rd international design and test workshop, Monastir, Tunisia, pp 98–103

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dennard RH, Gaensslen FH, Yu H-N, Leo Rideovt V, Bassous E, Leblanc AR (2007) Design of ion-implanted MOSFET’s with very small physical dimensions. In: IEEE solid-state circuits society newsletter, vol 12, pp 38–50

    Google Scholar 

  15. International technology roadmap for semiconductors, Process integration devices and structures (PIDS) (2011) http://www.itrs.net/Links/2011ITRS/Home2011.htm

  16. Lent CS, Tougaw PD, Porod W, Bernstein GH (1993) Quantum cellular automata. Nanotechnology 4(1):49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Snider GL, Orlov AO, Amlani I et al (1999) Quantum-dot cellular automata: review and recent experiments (invited). J Appl Phys 85(8):4283–4285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim SW, Swartzlander EE (2009) Parallel multipliers for quantum-dot cellular automata. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE nanotechnology materials and devices conference, Traverse City, MI, USA, pp 68–72

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kim SW, Swartzlander EE (2010) Multipliers with coplanar crossings for quantum-dot cellular automata. In: Proceedings of the 10th IEEE international conference on nanotechnology, Seoul, Republic of Korea, pp 953–957

    Google Scholar 

  20. Balali M, Rezai A, Balali H, Rabiei F, Emadi S (2017) Towards coplanar quantum-dot cellular automata adders based on efficient three-input XOR gate. Results Phys 7:1989–1995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sasamal TN, Singh, AK, Mohan A (2016) Efficient design of reversible ALU in quantum-dot cellular automata. Optik 127(15):6172–6182

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sasamal TN, Singh AK, Ghanekar U (2016) Design of non-restoring binary array divider in majority logic-based QCA. Electron Lett 52(24):2001–2003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kianpour M, Nadooshan RS (2011) A novel modular decoder implementation in quantum-dot cellular automata (QCA). In: Proceedings of the 2011 international conference on nanoscience, technology and societal implications (NSTSI), Bhubaneswar, India, pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kianpour M, Nadooshan RS (2016) A novel quantum dot cellular automata X-bit × 32-bit SRAM. IEEE Trans Very Large Scale Integr (VLSI) Syst 24(3):827–836

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chougule PP, Sen B, Dongale TD (2017) Realization of processing in-memory computing architecture using quantum dot cellular automata. Microprocess Microsyst 52:49–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paramjeet Chauhan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chauhan, P., Gupta, S. (2023). Challenges and Future Perspectives of Low-Power VLSI Circuits: A Study. In: Agrawal, R., Kishore Singh, C., Goyal, A., Singh, D.K. (eds) Modern Electronics Devices and Communication Systems. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 948. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6383-4_46

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6383-4_46

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-6382-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-6383-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics