Abstract
Employing electromagnetic probes, in particular high-energy γ photons, offers an outstanding advantage over neutron- or particle-induced reactions in the investigation of the fission process. Photon-induced reactions have well-established selection rules and thus can be characterized by a high spin selectivity. In contrast to the generally very complex excitation spectra of the compound nuclei in particle-induced fission, the interpretation of photofission is rather simple due to the predominant E1 absorption of γ photons. Besides, in neutron-induced fission reactions, a lower limit on the excitation energy of the fissioning system is set by the released separation energy, which could be overcome by the use of transfer reactions, e.g., (d,pf) and (3He,df). However, these coincidence measurements generally suffer from a dominant prompt fission background. With photons, none of these limitations occur, which triggered the scientific community to perform low-energy photofission experiments already in the early 1960s. Such measurements were performed primarily with bremsstrahlung radiation and its variants with high flux, but with very large energy uncertainty. Very recently, photonuclear and photofission physics has just entered a new era by the development of Compton-backscattered γ-ray sources offering an unprecedented tool to investigate the fission process both with high flux and at the same time with high-energy resolution.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
T. Ari-izumi, Photofission and photoneutron cross section measurements by neutron-multiplicity sorting, in LASTI Annual Report (Hyogo, Japan, 2019), p. 13
J.D.T. Arruda-Neto, Phys. Rev. C 74, 034324 (2006)
B.B. Back, Phys. Rev. C 10, 1948 (1974a)
B.B. Back, Phys. Rev. C 9, 1924 (1974b)
H. Backe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 490 (1979)
C.P.J. Barty, Mono-Energetic Gamma-rays (MEGa-rays) and the Dawn of Nuclear Photonics, in CLEO:2011 - Laser Applications to Photonic Applications, OSA Technical Digest (CD) (Optica Publishing Group, 2011), paper ATuF2.
H. Beil, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 67, 293 (1969)
G. Bellia, Phys. Rev. C 20, 1059 (1979)
G. Bellia, Phys. Rev. C 24, 2762 (1981)
B.L. Berman, Phys. Rev. C 34, 2201 (1986)
B.L. Berman, S.C. Fultz, Rev. Modern Phys. 47, 713 (1975)
B.S. Bhandari, Phys. Rev. C 19, 1820 (1979)
B.S. Bhandari, Phys. Rev. C 22, 606 (1980)
B.S. Bhandari, Phys. Rev. C 39, 917 (1989)
S. Bjornholm, J.E. Lynn, Rev. Modern Phys. 52, 725 (1980)
J. Blons, Nucl. Phys. A414, 1 (1984)
J. Blons, Nucl. Phys. A477, 231 (1988)
A. Bohr, Proceedings of the 1st UN Internatinoal Conference on Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy (New York), vol. 1, p. 151 (1956)
C.D. Bowman, Phys. Rev. 133, B676 (1964)
C.D. Bowman, Phys. Rev. C 12, 856 (1975a)
C.D. Bowman, Phys. Rev. C 12, 863 (1975b)
C.D. Bowman, Phys. Rev. C 17, 1086 (1978)
J.T. Caldwell, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 73, 153 (1980a)
J.T. Caldwell, Phys. Rev. C 21, 1215 (1980b)
J.T. Caldwell, E.J. Dowdy, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 56, 179 (1975)
R. Capote, Nuclear Data Sheets 110, 3107 (2009)
M. Csatlos, Phys. Lett. B615, 175 (2005)
L. Csige, Phys. Rev. C 80, 011301 (2009)
L. Csige, Phys. Rev. C 85, 054306 (2012)
L. Csige, Phys. Rev. C 87, 044321 (2013)
S. Ćwiok, Phys. Lett. B322, 304 (1994)
P.A. Dickey, P. Axel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 501 (1975)
J. Drexler, Nucl. Phys. A437, 253 (1985)
T. von Egidy, D. Bucurescu, Phys. Rev. C 72, 044311 (2005)
ELI-NP, Variable energy gamma (vega) system at ELI-NP short description. https://www.eli-np.ro/rd2_second.php (2021). Accessed: 17 Dec 2021
D. Filipescu, Eur. Phys. J. A 51, 185 (2015)
D.J.S. Findlay, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 213, 353 (1983)
D.J.S. Findlay, Nucl. Phys. A458, 217 (1986)
L.P. Geraldo, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 136, 357 (2000)
I. Gheorghe, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 1019, 165867 (2021)
P. Glaessel, Nucl. Phys. A256, 220 (1976)
F. Goennenwein, Nucl. Phys. A734, 213 (2004)
S. Goriely, Phys. Rev. C 79, 024612 (2009)
G.M. Gurevich, Nucl. Phys. A273, 326 (1976)
Z.R. Hao, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 1013, 165638 (2021)
M. Hunyadi, Phys. Lett. B505, 27 (2001)
P. Jachimowicz, Phys. Rev. C 101, 014311 (2020)
G.D. James, Phys. Rev. C 15, 2083 (1977)
T. Kawano, Nucl. Data Sheets 163, 109 (2020)
A.M. Khan, J.W. Knowles, Nucl. Phys. A179, 333 (1972)
J.W. Knowles, Pyhs. Lett. B116, 315 (1982)
I.S. Koretskaya, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 30, 472 (1979)
M. Kowal, Phys. Rev. C 85, 061302 (2012)
A. Krasznahorkay, Phys. Lett. B461, 15 (1999)
A. Leprêtre, Nucl. Phys. A472, 533 (1987)
J.D. McDonnel, W. Nazarewicz, J.A. Sheikh, Phys. Rev. C 87, 054327 (2013)
L. Meitner, O.R. Frisch, Nature 143, 239 (1939)
P. Moeller and J. R. Nix, Proc. Third IAEA Symp. on physics and chemistry of fission, Rochester,1973 (IAEA, Vienna, 1974), paper IAEA-SM-174/202, 1, p. 103 (1974)
J.M. Mueller, Phys. Rev. C 85, 014605 (2012)
J.M. Mueller, Phys. Rev. C 89, 034615 (2014)
C. Paradela, Phys. Rev. C 82, 034601 (2010)
S. Plattard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 633 (1981)
S.M. Polikanov, Sov. Phys. JETP 15, 1016 (1962)
S. Pomme, Phys. Rev. C 49, 991 (1994)
N.S. Rabotnov, Phys. Lett. B26, 218 (1968)
T. Rauscher, Phys. Rev. C 56, 1613 (1997)
T. San-Tsiang, Nature 159, 773 (1947)
D. Savran, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A613, 232 (2010)
J. Schirmer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 2196 (1989)
J.A. Silano, H.J. Karwowski, Phys. Rev. C 98, 054609 (2018)
M. Sin, Phys. Rev. C 93, 034605 (2016)
M. Sin, Phys. Rev. C 103, 054605 (2021)
B. Singh, Nuclear Data Sheets 78, 1 (1996)
G.N. Smirenkin, Phys. Atom. Nuclei 59, 185 (1996)
P.A. Soderstrom, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2021.166171 (2021), in press
A.S. Soldatov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 55, 1757 (1992)
A.S. Soldatov, Phys. Atom. Nuclei 58, 182 (1995)
A.S. Soldatov, Phys. Atom. Nuclei 63, 31 (2000)
A.S. Soldatov, Phys. Atom. Nuclei 64, 169 (2001)
A.S. Soldatov, Phys. Atom. Nuclei 66, 547 (2003)
M. Soleilhac, J. Nucl. Energy 23, 257 (1969)
H.J. Specht, Phys. Lett. B 41, 43 (1972)
F. Steiper, Nucl. Phys. A563, 282 (1993)
V.M. Strutinsky, Nucl. Phys. A95, 420 (1967)
J. Terrell, Phys. Rev. 108, 783 (1957)
J.P. Theobald, Nucl. Phys. A502, 343 (1989)
P.G. Thirolf, D. Habs, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 49, 325 (2002)
C.A. Ur, AIP Conf. Proc. 1645 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4909580
H. Utsunomiya, Nucl. Phys. News 25, 25 (2015)
H. Utsunomiya, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 871, 135 (2017)
V.V. Varlamov, Eur. Phys. J. A 50, 114 (2014)
M. Verboven, Phys. Rev. C 49, 991 (1994)
A. Veyssière, Nucl. Phys. A199, 45 (1973)
S.J. Watson, Nucl. Phys. A548, 365 (1992)
H.R. Weller, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 62, 257 (2009)
J.F. Wild, Phys. Rev. C 32, 488 (1985)
E.J. Winhold, Phys. Rev. 87, 1139 (1952)
M.V. Yester, Nucl. Phys. A206, 593 (1973)
H.X. Zhang, Phys. Rev. C 34, 1397 (1986)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Csige, L., Filipescu, D.M. (2023). Photofission Studies: Past and Future. In: Tanihata, I., Toki, H., Kajino, T. (eds) Handbook of Nuclear Physics . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6345-2_81
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6345-2_81
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-6344-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-6345-2
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Chemistry, Materials and Physics