Abstract
In this work the condensation process of steam inside a converging diverging nozzle is simulated, the experiments on which were performed by Moses and Stein [1]. Three different flow solvers are used for this purpose, namely, Ansys Fluent, Ansys CFX and the open source flow solver OpenFOAM. The aim of the current work is to narrow down the choice of the flow solver which can finally be used for simulating non-equilibrium condensation of Carbon Dioxide inside ejectors. The pressure distribution predicted inside the nozzle by the three solvers follow closely the experimental one. However, the location and amount of pressure rise due to the condensation onset are differently predicted by the flow solvers. Only one plateau is observed in the pressure curve experimentally while at least two different plateaus are predicted numerically. For the vapor temperature and supercooling, the three solvers predict similar values before the condensation onset. After start of condensation, Ansys Fluent and OpenFOAM give similar results while Ansys CFX predicts at least 10 degree higher values. Ansys CFX predicts a wider nucleation zone compared to the two other solvers. The highest discrepancy being displayed by the solvers appears in the distribution of droplet diameter and droplet number density. However, the three solvers predict similar trend for the liquid mass fraction distribution inside the nozzle.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
C. Moses and G. Stein, “On the growth of steam droplets formed in a laval nozzle using both static pressure and light scattering measurements,” NASA STI/Recon Technical Report N, vol. 77, 1977.
P. G. Hill, “Condensation of water vapour during supersonic expansion in nozzles,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 593–620, 1966.
A. Ameli, A. Afzalifar, and T. Turunen-Saaresti, “Non-equilibrium condensation of supercritical carbon dioxide in a convergingdiverging nozzle,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 821, p. 012025, IOP Publishing, 2017.
A. Ameli, T. Turunen-Saaresti, and J. Backman, “Numerical investigation of the flow behavior inside a supercritical co2 centrifugal compressor,” Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, vol. 140, no. 12, p. 122604, 2018.
S. Dykas and W. Wr´oblewski, “Single and two-fluid models for steam condensing flow modeling,” International Journal of Multiphase Flow, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 1245–1253, 2011.
Y. Yang, J. H. Walther, Y. Yan, and C. Wen, “Cfd modeling of condensation process of water vapor in supersonic flows,” Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 115, pp. 1357–1362, 2017.
C. H. Kim, J. H. Park, D. I. Kim, and J. H. Baek, “Numerical analysis of non-equilibrium steam condensing flows in various laval nozzles and cascades,” Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 172–183, 2017.
J. Starzmann, F. R. Hughes, S. Schuster, A. J. White, J. Halama, V. Hric, M. Kolovratn´ık, H. Lee, L. Sova, M. ˇ Stastn`y, et al., “Results of the international wet steam modeling project,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, vol. 232, no. 5, pp. 550–570, 2018.
S. Dykas, M. Majkut, K. Smołka, and M. Strozik, “Analysis of the steam condensing flow in a linear blade cascade,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, vol. 232, no. 5, pp. 501–514, 2018.
M. Gr¨ubel, J. Starzmann, M. Schatz, and D. M. Vogt, “Modelling of condensing steam flows in laval nozzles with ansys cfx,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, vol. 232, no. 5, pp. 571–575, 2018.
A. Gerber, “Inhomogeneous multifluid model for prediction of nonequilibrium phase transition and droplet dynamics,” Journal of fluids engineering, vol. 130, no. 3, 2008.
F. Bakhtar, J. Young, A. White, and D. Simpson, “Classical nucleation theory and its application to condensing steam flow calculations,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, vol. 219, no. 12, pp. 1315–1333, 2005.
T. Petrova and R. Dooley, “Revised release on surface tension of ordinary water substance,” Proceedings of the International Association for the Properties of Water and Steam, Moscow, Russia, pp. 23–27, 2014.
W. Wagner and H.-J. Kretzschmar, “Iapws industrial formulation 1997 for the thermodynamic properties of water and steam,” International Steam Tables: Properties of Water and Steam Based on the Industrial Formulation IAPWS-IF97, pp. 7–150, 2008.
F. R. Menter, “Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications,” AIAA journal, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1598–1605, 1994.
C. Geuzaine and J.-F. Remacle, “Gmsh: A 3-d finite element mesh generator with built-in pre-and post-processing facilities,” International journal for numerical methods in engineering, vol. 79, no. 11, pp. 1309–1331, 2009.
H. G. Weller, G. Tabor, H. Jasak, and C. Fureby, “A tensorial approach to computational continuum mechanics using object-oriented techniques,” Computers in physics, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 620–631, 1998.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Das Sahu, K., Yadav, S.S., Dasgupta, M.S. (2023). A Comparison of Three Different Flow Solvers For Simulating Steam Condensation Inside a Nozzle. In: Bhattacharyya, S., Verma, S., Harikrishnan, A.R. (eds) Fluid Mechanics and Fluid Power (Vol. 3). FMFP 2021. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6270-7_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6270-7_32
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-6269-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-6270-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)