Skip to main content

A Comparison of Three Different Flow Solvers For Simulating Steam Condensation Inside a Nozzle

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Fluid Mechanics and Fluid Power (Vol. 3) (FMFP 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 705 Accesses

Abstract

In this work the condensation process of steam inside a converging diverging nozzle is simulated, the experiments on which were performed by Moses and Stein [1]. Three different flow solvers are used for this purpose, namely, Ansys Fluent, Ansys CFX and the open source flow solver OpenFOAM. The aim of the current work is to narrow down the choice of the flow solver which can finally be used for simulating non-equilibrium condensation of Carbon Dioxide inside ejectors. The pressure distribution predicted inside the nozzle by the three solvers follow closely the experimental one. However, the location and amount of pressure rise due to the condensation onset are differently predicted by the flow solvers. Only one plateau is observed in the pressure curve experimentally while at least two different plateaus are predicted numerically. For the vapor temperature and supercooling, the three solvers predict similar values before the condensation onset. After start of condensation, Ansys Fluent and OpenFOAM give similar results while Ansys CFX predicts at least 10 degree higher values. Ansys CFX predicts a wider nucleation zone compared to the two other solvers. The highest discrepancy being displayed by the solvers appears in the distribution of droplet diameter and droplet number density. However, the three solvers predict similar trend for the liquid mass fraction distribution inside the nozzle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. C. Moses and G. Stein, “On the growth of steam droplets formed in a laval nozzle using both static pressure and light scattering measurements,” NASA STI/Recon Technical Report N, vol. 77, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. G. Hill, “Condensation of water vapour during supersonic expansion in nozzles,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 593–620, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Ameli, A. Afzalifar, and T. Turunen-Saaresti, “Non-equilibrium condensation of supercritical carbon dioxide in a convergingdiverging nozzle,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 821, p. 012025, IOP Publishing, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Ameli, T. Turunen-Saaresti, and J. Backman, “Numerical investigation of the flow behavior inside a supercritical co2 centrifugal compressor,” Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, vol. 140, no. 12, p. 122604, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Dykas and W. Wr´oblewski, “Single and two-fluid models for steam condensing flow modeling,” International Journal of Multiphase Flow, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 1245–1253, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Y. Yang, J. H. Walther, Y. Yan, and C. Wen, “Cfd modeling of condensation process of water vapor in supersonic flows,” Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 115, pp. 1357–1362, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. H. Kim, J. H. Park, D. I. Kim, and J. H. Baek, “Numerical analysis of non-equilibrium steam condensing flows in various laval nozzles and cascades,” Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 172–183, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Starzmann, F. R. Hughes, S. Schuster, A. J. White, J. Halama, V. Hric, M. Kolovratn´ık, H. Lee, L. Sova, M. ˇ Stastn`y, et al., “Results of the international wet steam modeling project,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, vol. 232, no. 5, pp. 550–570, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Dykas, M. Majkut, K. Smołka, and M. Strozik, “Analysis of the steam condensing flow in a linear blade cascade,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, vol. 232, no. 5, pp. 501–514, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Gr¨ubel, J. Starzmann, M. Schatz, and D. M. Vogt, “Modelling of condensing steam flows in laval nozzles with ansys cfx,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, vol. 232, no. 5, pp. 571–575, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Gerber, “Inhomogeneous multifluid model for prediction of nonequilibrium phase transition and droplet dynamics,” Journal of fluids engineering, vol. 130, no. 3, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  12. F. Bakhtar, J. Young, A. White, and D. Simpson, “Classical nucleation theory and its application to condensing steam flow calculations,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, vol. 219, no. 12, pp. 1315–1333, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  13. T. Petrova and R. Dooley, “Revised release on surface tension of ordinary water substance,” Proceedings of the International Association for the Properties of Water and Steam, Moscow, Russia, pp. 23–27, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  14. W. Wagner and H.-J. Kretzschmar, “Iapws industrial formulation 1997 for the thermodynamic properties of water and steam,” International Steam Tables: Properties of Water and Steam Based on the Industrial Formulation IAPWS-IF97, pp. 7–150, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  15. F. R. Menter, “Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications,” AIAA journal, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1598–1605, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. Geuzaine and J.-F. Remacle, “Gmsh: A 3-d finite element mesh generator with built-in pre-and post-processing facilities,” International journal for numerical methods in engineering, vol. 79, no. 11, pp. 1309–1331, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. G. Weller, G. Tabor, H. Jasak, and C. Fureby, “A tensorial approach to computational continuum mechanics using object-oriented techniques,” Computers in physics, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 620–631, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shyam Sunder Yadav .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Das Sahu, K., Yadav, S.S., Dasgupta, M.S. (2023). A Comparison of Three Different Flow Solvers For Simulating Steam Condensation Inside a Nozzle. In: Bhattacharyya, S., Verma, S., Harikrishnan, A.R. (eds) Fluid Mechanics and Fluid Power (Vol. 3). FMFP 2021. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6270-7_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6270-7_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-6269-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-6270-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics