Skip to main content

Fieldwork for Data Collection: Preparation and Challenges

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Principles of Social Research Methodology
  • 2189 Accesses

Abstract

Field research is an important aspect of any empirical social study. Field research can be challenging, exciting as well as rewarding and daunting too. The purpose of this chapter is to discuss the meaning and importance of field research and to provide a basic understanding to the new researcher who wants to conduct field research about the process of field research. While the chapter highlight the common field research practices, it will also discuss the potential tensions, dilemmas and challenges that may encounter during field research and the possible strategies needed to address them. This chapter argues that researcher should be sensitive and careful regarding reflexivity, positionality, and the relations of power during field research in order to conduct an emancipatory, democratic, and culturally sensitive field research. Such activity includes greater attention to the openness about the purpose of the research and activities undertaken, self-disclosure, mutual sharing of information, and explicit recognition of the expertise of the participant that they gained through lived experiences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Davis, R. (1984). The fole of the Gorontological Nurse in the case of Elderly. Socioeconomic Planning, 19(4), 279–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. (2001). Contemporary field research: Perspective and Formulations. Waveland Pr. Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1991).Siminascybrogs and women: The reinvention of nature. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartsock, N. (1987). The feminist standpoint:Developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical Materialism. In Harding S(Ed.), Feminism and methodology (p.157–180). University of Indiana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herr, K., & Anderson, G. L. (2006). The action research dissertation: A guide for students and faculty. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel, M., & Lain, H. (2006). Reseach ethics for social scientists: between ethical conduct and regulatory compliance. Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi, A. (1994). Coloring the field: Gender, race and the politics of fieldwork. The Professional Geographer, 46, 73–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosygina, L. (2005). Doing gender in research: Reflection on experience in field. The Qualitative Report, 10(1), 87–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal, J. (1996). Situating locations: The politics of self, identity and other in living and writing the texts. In D. Wolfs (Ed.), Feminist diallemmas in fieldwork (pp. 185–214). Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. (2006). Designing qualitative research. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, B. (2001). The knowledge gap: Implications for early education. University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phoenix, A. (1994). Practising feminist research: The intersection of gender and ‘race’ in the research process. In M. Maynard & J. Purvis (Eds.), Researching women’s lives from a feminist perspective (pp. 49–71). Taylor and Francis limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punch, K. F. (2005). Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. London: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzman and Strauss. (1973). Development field work: A practical guide (p. 170). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S., Miller, F., & Lloyd, K. (2005). Doing fieldwork in development geography: Researh culture and research spaces in Vietnam. Geographical Research, 44(1), 28–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahab, S. (2003). Creating knowledge collaboratively with female sex workers: Insights from a qualitative, feminist and participatory study. Qualitative Inquiry, 9, 625–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wax, M., & Wax, R. (1980). Fieldwork and the research process. John Wiley & Sons.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Md. Abul Hossen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Abul Hossen, M. (2022). Fieldwork for Data Collection: Preparation and Challenges. In: Islam, M.R., Khan, N.A., Baikady, R. (eds) Principles of Social Research Methodology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5441-2_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5441-2_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-5219-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-5441-2

  • eBook Packages: Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics