Skip to main content

Abstract

Inferential statistics help researchers by two major means. Firstly, they are used to extrapolate the result obtained from studying sample to a greater population. Secondly, they are used for hypothesis testing. They are otherwise called as statistical test of significance. These tests are broadly classified into parametric and non-parametric tests of significance. Parametric tests are those that make assumptions about the parameters of the population. The general assumption is that the population data are normally distributed. Hence, the sample data that is collected from population also to be normally distributed in order to apply the parametric test of significance to test hypothesis. Apart from that, there are various other assumptions to be fulfilled by the sample data to use parametric test of significance. If any of these assumptions is violated, then its equivalent non-parametric tests have to be applied. The appropriate choice of selection of parametric test depends on, type of dependent and independent variables, number of groups to be compared and the relatedness of data. Various parametric tests commonly used are, student’s t test, paired t test, one way and two ways ANOVA, one way and two way repeated measures ANOVA, Pearson’s correlation and linear regression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Ali Z, Bhaskar SB. Basic statistical tools in research and data analysis. Indian J Anaesth. 2016;60:662–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altman DG, Bland JM. Parametric vs non-parametric methods for data analysis. BMJ. 2009;338:a3167. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a3167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell MJ, Swinscow TDV. Statistics at square one. 11th ed. Wiley-Blackwell: BMJ Books; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan YH. Biostatistics 102: quantitative data – parametric & non-parametric tests. Singap Med J. 2003;44(8):391–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravetter JF, Wallnau BL. Statistics for the behavioral sciences. 9th ed. Jon-David Hague; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rana RK, Singhal R, Dua P. Deciphering the dilemma of parametric and nonparametric tests. J Pract Cardiovasc Sci. 2016;2:95–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vimal, M., Venugopal, V., Anandabaskar, N. (2022). Parametric Tests. In: Lakshmanan, M., Shewade, D.G., Raj, G.M. (eds) Introduction to Basics of Pharmacology and Toxicology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5343-9_61

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5343-9_61

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-5342-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-5343-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics