Abstract
Around the world many governments are increasingly pushing for wide-scale adoption of Building Information Modelling (BIM) in the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry. Central to this drive are policy-backed mandates making BIM use compulsory for firms engaged on public sector construction projects. Additional to mandates, policy instruments with varied implications are often deployed to promote widespread use of BIM. Yet, there is scant understanding about existing policy instruments and the varied impacts they have on the realization of BIM use. This paper, based on the case of the Hong Kong AEC industry, examines the BIM policy instruments, their evolution and varied impacts on BIM adoption. Based on an in-depth content analysis, the study offers an overview of the process of BIM policy implementation. The findings reveal the steps taken by public organizations and professional associations in guiding and promoting BIM adoption and implementation, and the impacts derived from the combination use of different policy instruments, including regulatory instruments, economic instruments, cooperative and standard-based instruments, and communicative and informative instruments. This paper contributes to understanding of utilization of multiple BIM policy instruments. The insights could inform approaches adopted by policymakers as they explore policy designs for industry-wide technological transformation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aksenova, G., Kiviniemi, A., Kocaturk, T., Lejeune, A.: From finnish AEC knowledge ecosystem to business ecosystem: lessons learned from the national deployment of BIM. Constr.Manag. Econ. 37(6), 317–335 (2019)
CIC: Roadmap for BIM Strategic Implementation in Hong Kong’s Construction Industry (2014)
Dainty, A., Leiringer, R., Fernie, S., Harty, C.: BIM and the small construction firm: a critical perspective. Build. Res. Inf. 45(6), 696–709 (2017)
Edler, J., Fagerberg, J.: Innovation policy: what, why, and how. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 33(1), 2–23 (2017)
Edquist, C., Hommen, L.: Small Country Innovation Systems: Globalization, Change and Policy in Asia and Europe. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham (2008)
EMSD: Building Information Modelling for Asset Management (BIM-AM) Standards and Guidelines Version 2.0, Hong Kong (2019)
Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E., Laranja, M.: Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’ for innovation. Res. Policy 40(5), 702–713 (2011)
HM Government: The Construction Playbook. Government Guidance on Sourcing and Contracting Public Works and Programmes. Cabinet Office, London (2020)
Ho, H.H.: BIM standards in Hong Kong: development, impact and future. In: 7th Annual International Conference on Architecture and Civil Engineering (2019)
Howlett, M.: Beyond good and evil in policy implementation: instrument mixes, implementation styles, and second generation theories of policy instrument choice. Policy Soc. 23(2), 1–17 (2017)
Howlett, M., Rayner, J.: design principles for policy mixes: cohesion and coherence in ‘New Governance Arrangements.’ Policy Soc. 26(4), 1–18 (2007)
Kassem, M., Succar, B.: Macro BIM adoption: comparative market analysis. Autom. Constr. 81, 286–299 (2017)
Lee, G., Borrmann, A.: BIM policy and management. Constr. Manag. Econ. 38(5), 413–419 (2020)
Lindblad, H., Guerrero, J.R.: Client’s role in promoting BIM implementation and innovation in construction. Constr. Manag. Econ. 38(5), 468–482 (2020)
McDonnell, L.M., Grubb, W.N.: Education and Training for Work: The Policy Instruments and the Institutions. National Center for Research in Vocational Education, Berkeley (1991)
McDonnell, L.M., Elmore, R.F.: Getting the job done: alternative policy instruments. Educ. Eval. Policy Anal. 9(2), 133–152 (1987)
NBS: NBS’ 10th National BIM Report (2020). https://www.thenbs.com/bim-report-2020
Oti-Sarpong, K., Leiringer, R., Zhang, S.: A critical examination of BIM policy mandates: implications and industry reponses. In: Construction Research Congress (CRC), Tempe, Arizona, USA, 8–10 March 2020
Sacks, R., Eastman, C., Lee, G., Teicholz, P.: BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Designers, Engineers, Contractors, and Facility Managers, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York (2018)
Vedung, E.: Policy instruments: typologies and theories. In: Bemelmans-Videc, M.L., Rist, R.C., Vedung, E. (eds.) Carrots, Sticks and Sermons. Policy Instruments and Their Evaluation. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick (1998)
Wong, A.K.D., Wong, F.K.W., Nadeem, A.: Government roles in implementing building information modelling systems. Constr. Innov. 11(1), 61–76 (2011)
Yang, J.-B., Chou, H.-Y.: Mixed approach to government BIM implementation policy: an empirical study of Taiwan. J. Build. Eng. 20, 337–343 (2018)
Acknowledgement
This study is funded by RGC General Research Fund in Hong Kong (HKU Project Code 17206717), supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 72101220) and National Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (No. 2022J05001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zhang, S., Oti-Sarpong, K., Leiringer, R. (2022). Evolution of Building Information Modelling (BIM) Policy: The Case of Hong Kong. In: Guo, H., Fang, D., Lu, W., Peng, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 26th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate. CRIOCM 2021. Lecture Notes in Operations Research. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5256-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5256-2_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-5255-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-5256-2
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)