Skip to main content

Evolution of Building Information Modelling (BIM) Policy: The Case of Hong Kong

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 26th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate (CRIOCM 2021)

Abstract

Around the world many governments are increasingly pushing for wide-scale adoption of Building Information Modelling (BIM) in the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry. Central to this drive are policy-backed mandates making BIM use compulsory for firms engaged on public sector construction projects. Additional to mandates, policy instruments with varied implications are often deployed to promote widespread use of BIM. Yet, there is scant understanding about existing policy instruments and the varied impacts they have on the realization of BIM use. This paper, based on the case of the Hong Kong AEC industry, examines the BIM policy instruments, their evolution and varied impacts on BIM adoption. Based on an in-depth content analysis, the study offers an overview of the process of BIM policy implementation. The findings reveal the steps taken by public organizations and professional associations in guiding and promoting BIM adoption and implementation, and the impacts derived from the combination use of different policy instruments, including regulatory instruments, economic instruments, cooperative and standard-based instruments, and communicative and informative instruments. This paper contributes to understanding of utilization of multiple BIM policy instruments. The insights could inform approaches adopted by policymakers as they explore policy designs for industry-wide technological transformation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aksenova, G., Kiviniemi, A., Kocaturk, T., Lejeune, A.: From finnish AEC knowledge ecosystem to business ecosystem: lessons learned from the national deployment of BIM. Constr.Manag. Econ. 37(6), 317–335 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • CIC: Roadmap for BIM Strategic Implementation in Hong Kong’s Construction Industry (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dainty, A., Leiringer, R., Fernie, S., Harty, C.: BIM and the small construction firm: a critical perspective. Build. Res. Inf. 45(6), 696–709 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edler, J., Fagerberg, J.: Innovation policy: what, why, and how. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 33(1), 2–23 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edquist, C., Hommen, L.: Small Country Innovation Systems: Globalization, Change and Policy in Asia and Europe. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • EMSD: Building Information Modelling for Asset Management (BIM-AM) Standards and Guidelines Version 2.0, Hong Kong (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E., Laranja, M.: Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’ for innovation. Res. Policy 40(5), 702–713 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HM Government: The Construction Playbook. Government Guidance on Sourcing and Contracting Public Works and Programmes. Cabinet Office, London (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, H.H.: BIM standards in Hong Kong: development, impact and future. In: 7th Annual International Conference on Architecture and Civil Engineering (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M.: Beyond good and evil in policy implementation: instrument mixes, implementation styles, and second generation theories of policy instrument choice. Policy Soc. 23(2), 1–17 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M., Rayner, J.: design principles for policy mixes: cohesion and coherence in ‘New Governance Arrangements.’ Policy Soc. 26(4), 1–18 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassem, M., Succar, B.: Macro BIM adoption: comparative market analysis. Autom. Constr. 81, 286–299 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, G., Borrmann, A.: BIM policy and management. Constr. Manag. Econ. 38(5), 413–419 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindblad, H., Guerrero, J.R.: Client’s role in promoting BIM implementation and innovation in construction. Constr. Manag. Econ. 38(5), 468–482 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, L.M., Grubb, W.N.: Education and Training for Work: The Policy Instruments and the Institutions. National Center for Research in Vocational Education, Berkeley (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, L.M., Elmore, R.F.: Getting the job done: alternative policy instruments. Educ. Eval. Policy Anal. 9(2), 133–152 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NBS: NBS’ 10th National BIM Report (2020). https://www.thenbs.com/bim-report-2020

  • Oti-Sarpong, K., Leiringer, R., Zhang, S.: A critical examination of BIM policy mandates: implications and industry reponses. In: Construction Research Congress (CRC), Tempe, Arizona, USA, 8–10 March 2020

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, R., Eastman, C., Lee, G., Teicholz, P.: BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Designers, Engineers, Contractors, and Facility Managers, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York (2018)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vedung, E.: Policy instruments: typologies and theories. In: Bemelmans-Videc, M.L., Rist, R.C., Vedung, E. (eds.) Carrots, Sticks and Sermons. Policy Instruments and Their Evaluation. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, A.K.D., Wong, F.K.W., Nadeem, A.: Government roles in implementing building information modelling systems. Constr. Innov. 11(1), 61–76 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J.-B., Chou, H.-Y.: Mixed approach to government BIM implementation policy: an empirical study of Taiwan. J. Build. Eng. 20, 337–343 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study is funded by RGC General Research Fund in Hong Kong (HKU Project Code 17206717), supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 72101220) and National Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (No. 2022J05001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sujuan Zhang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhang, S., Oti-Sarpong, K., Leiringer, R. (2022). Evolution of Building Information Modelling (BIM) Policy: The Case of Hong Kong. In: Guo, H., Fang, D., Lu, W., Peng, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 26th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate. CRIOCM 2021. Lecture Notes in Operations Research. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5256-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics