Skip to main content

On the Efficacy of Deep Image Denoising for Computer Vision Applications

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Futuristic Trends in Networks and Computing Technologies

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 936))

  • 895 Accesses

Abstract

Image denoising is a process of inverse reconstruction where the original image is reconstructed from its noisy observations. Several deep learning models have been developed for image denoising. Usually, the performance of image denoising is measured by metrics like structural similarity index (SSIM) and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), however in this paper, we take a more pragmatic approach. We design and conduct experiments to evaluate the performance of deep image denoising methods in terms of improving the performance of some popular computer vision (CV) algorithms after image denoising. In this paper, we have comparatively analyzed: fast and flexible denoising (FFDNet) convolution neural network (CNN), feed forward denoising CNN (DnCNN), and deep image prior (DIP)-based image denoising. CV algorithms experimented with are face detection, face recognition, and object detection. Standard and augmented datasets were used in our experiments. Various types and amounts of noise were added to raw images from standard datasets (BSDS500, LFW, FDDB, and WGSID). We may conclude from our findings that image denoising does not improve the performance of CV algorithms when applied to raw images of datasets. But image denoising is very effective in improving the performance of the CV methods when denoising is applied to noise corrupted images of the datasets. In our experiments, we found results where the improvements were up to 11.70% in terms of accuracy for the face detection experiment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fan L, Zhang F, Fan H et al (2019) Brief review of image denoising techniques. Vis Comput Ind Biomed Art 2:7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Turk MA, Pentland A (1991) Face recognition using eigenfaces. In: Proceedings of 1991 IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 586–591

    Google Scholar 

  3. Viola P, Jones M (2001) Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features. In: Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. CVPR 2001

    Google Scholar 

  4. Redmon J, Divvala S, Girshick R, Farhadi A (2016) You only look once: unified, real-time object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kumar P, Dick A, Sheng TS (2009) Real time target tracking with pan tilt zoom camera. Digital Image Comput Techn Appl 2009:492–497. https://doi.org/10.1109/DICTA.2009.84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Portilla J, Strela V, Wainwright MJ, Simoncelli EP (2003) Image denoising using scale mixtures of gaussians in the wavelet domain. IEEE Trans Image Process 12(11):1338–1351

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Jain V, Learned-Miller E. FDDB: a benchmark for face detection in unconstrained settings. University of Massachusetts, Amherst

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang K, Zuo W, Zhang L (2017) FFDNet: toward a fast and flexible solution for CNN based image denoising. IEEE Trans Image Process

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang K, Zuo W, Chen Y, Meng D, Zhang L (2017) Beyond a Gaussian Denoiser: residual learning of deep CNN for image denoising. IEEE Trans Image Process 26(7)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lempitsky V, Vedaldi A, Ulyanov D (2018) Deep image prior. IEEE/CVF Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recogn 2018:9446–9454. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2018.00984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Al-Najjar Y, Chen SD (2012) Comparison of image quality assessment: PSNR, HVS, SSIM, UIQI. Int J Sci Eng Res 3:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mittal A, Moorthy AK, Bovik AC (2011) Blind/referenceless image spatial quality evaluator (BRISQUE). In: 2011 conference record of the forty fifth asilomar conference on signals, systems and computers (ASILOMAR)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jocher G, Stoken A, Borovec J, NanoCode012, Christopher STAN, Liu C, Laughing, tkianai, yxNONG, Hogan A, lorenzomammana, AlexWang1900, Hajek J, Diaconu L, Marc KY, oleg, wanghaoyang0106, Defretin Y, Lohia A, ml5ah, Milanko B, Fineran B, Khromov D, Yiwei D, Doug D, Ingham F, Frederik, Guilhen, Colmagro A, Ye H; Jacobsolawetz, Poznanski J, Fang J, Kim J, Doan K, Yu L (2021, Jan 5) ultralytics/yolov5: v4.0 - nn.SiLU() activations, weights biases logging, PyTorch hub integration (version v4.0). Zenodo

    Google Scholar 

  14. Beitzel SM, Jensen EC, Frieder O (2009) Mean average precision. In: Liu L, Özsu MT (eds) Encyclopedia of database systems. Springer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  15. Santos T, de Souza, dos Santos Andreza L, Avila S (2019). Embrapa wine grape instance segmentation dataset—embrapa WGISD (version 1.0.0) [data set]. Zenodo

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ide H, Kurita T (2017) Improvement of learning for CNN with ReLU activation by sparse regularization. In: 2017 international joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ioffe S, Szegedy C (2015) Batch normalization: accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. In: Proceddings of international conference on machine learning, pp 448–456

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dabov K, Foi A, Katkovnik V, Egiazarian K (2006) Image denoising with block-matching and 3D filtering. In: Proceedings of SPIE 6064, image processing: algorithms and systems, neural networks, and machine learning, vol 606414, 17 Feb 2006. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.643267

  19. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J (2016) Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: 2016 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shah M, Kumar P (2021) Improved handling of motion blur for grape detection after deblurring. In: 2021 8th international conference on signal processing and integrated networks (SPIN), pp 949–954. https://doi.org/10.1109/SPIN52536.2021.9566112

  21. Gary BH, Jain V, Learned-Miller E (2007) Unsupervised joint alignment of complex images. ICCV

    Google Scholar 

  22. Diederik PK, Adam JB (2015) A method for stochastic optimization. In: Published as a conference paper at the 3rd International Conference for Learning Representations, San Diego, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ruder S (2016) An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms. ArXiv:1609.04747

  24. Sammut C, Webb GI (2011) Mean squared error. In: Encyclopedia of machine learning. Springer, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jolliffe I (2011) Principal component analysis. In: Lovric M (ed) International encyclopedia of statistical science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  26. Deng J, Dong W, Socher R, Li L, Kai L, Li F-F (2009) ImageNet: a large-scale hierarchical image database. IEEE Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recogn 2009:248–255. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Martin D, Fowlkes C, Tal D, Malik J. A database of human segmented natural images and its application to evaluating segmentation algorithms and measuring ecological statistics. In: Proceedings of 8th international conference on computer vision

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support-vector networks. Machine Learn 20(3):273–297

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manan Shah .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Shah, M., Kumar, P. (2022). On the Efficacy of Deep Image Denoising for Computer Vision Applications. In: Singh, P.K., Wierzchoń, S.T., Chhabra, J.K., Tanwar, S. (eds) Futuristic Trends in Networks and Computing Technologies . Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 936. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5037-7_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5037-7_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-5036-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-5037-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics