Abstract
Challenges to sustainable smart city development (SSCD) motivate the present research to propose a novel Fermatean fuzzy multi-criteria framework for evaluating four Iranian cities’ performance concerning the identified challenges. To this end, firstly, challenges to SSCD were identified through literature review, and then, an integrated MEREC-TOPSIS model under Fermatean fuzzy environment was proposed to determine the challenges’ weight and then rank Iranian cities. Results indicated that “social plausibility” is the most significant challenge to SSCD out of twelve identified challenges, followed by “lack of infrastructure.” On top of that, comparative studies and a sensitivity study were conducted to evaluate the efficiency and sensitivity of the proposed framework.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zheng, C., Yuan, J., Zhu, L., Zhang, Y., Shao, Q.: From digital to sustainable: a scientometric review of smart city literature between 1990 and 2019. J. Clean. Prod. 258, 120689 (2020)
Laufs, J., Borrion, H., Bradford, B.: Security and the smart city: a systematic review. Sustain. Cities Soc. 55, 102023 (2020)
Law, K.H., Lynch, J.P.: Smart city: technologies and challenges. IT Prof. 21, 46–51 (2019)
Wang, C.H., Steinfeld, E., Maisel, J.L., Kang, B.: Is your smart city inclusive? Evaluating proposals from the US department of transportation’s smart city challenge. Sustain. Cities Soc. 74, 103148 (2021)
Goodman, N., Zwick, A., Spicer, Z., Carlsen, N.: Public engagement in smart city development: Lessons from communities in Canada’s smart city challenge. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe Canadien 64, 416–432 (2020)
Rana, N.P., Luthra, S., Mangla, S.K., Islam, R., Roderick, S., Dwivedi, Y.K.: Barriers to the development of smart cities in Indian context. Inf. Syst. Front. 21, 503–525 (2019)
Khan, H.H., Malik, M.N., Zafar, R., Goni, F.A., Chofreh, A.G., Klemeš, J.J., Alotaibi, Y.: Challenges for sustainable smart city development: a conceptual framework. Sustain. Dev. 28, 1507–1518 (2020)
Saraji, M.K., Mardani, A., Köppen, M., Mishra, A.R., Rani, P.: An extended hesitant fuzzy set using SWARA-MULTIMOORA approach to adapt online education for the control of the pandemic spread of COVID-19 in higher education institutions. Artif. Intell. Rev. 1–26 (2021)
Atanassov, K.T.: Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. In: Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Springer pp. 1–137 (1999)
Mardani, A., Saraji, M.K., Mishra, A.R., Rani, P.: A novel extended approach under hesitant fuzzy sets to design a framework for assessing the key challenges of digital health interventions adoption during the COVID-19 outbreak. Appl. Soft Comput. 96, 106613 (2020)
Yager, R.R.: Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 22, 958–965 (2013)
Saraji, M.K., Streimikiene, D., Lauzadyte-Tutliene, A.: A novel pythogorean fuzzy-SWARA-CRITIC-COPRAS method for evaluating the barriers to developing business model innovation for sustainability. In: Handbook of Research on Novel Practices and Current Successes in Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals; IGI Global, pp. 1–31 (2021)
Liu, P., Rani, P., Mishra, A.R.: A novel Pythagorean fuzzy combined compromise solution framework for the assessment of medical waste treatment technology. J. Clean. Prod. 292, 126047 (2021)
Zhou, Q., Mo, H., Deng, Y.: A new divergence measure of pythagorean fuzzy sets based on belief function and its application in medical diagnosis. Mathematics 8, 142 (2020)
Rani, P., Mishra, A.R., Mardani, A.: An extended Pythagorean fuzzy complex proportional assessment approach with new entropy and score function: application in pharmacological therapy selection for type 2 diabetes. Appl. Soft Comput. 94, 106441 (2020)
Çalık, A.: A novel Pythagorean fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodology for green supplier selection in the Industry 4.0 era. Soft. Comput. 25, 2253–2265 (2021)
Kamali Saraji, M., Streimikiene, D., Ciegis, R.: A novel Pythagorean fuzzy-SWARA-TOPSIS framework for evaluating the EU progress towards sustainable energy development. Environ. Monit. Assess. 194, 1–19 (2022)
Ejegwa, P.A.: Modified Zhang and Xu’s distance measure for Pythagorean fuzzy sets and its application to pattern recognition problems. Neural Comput. Appl. 32, 10199–10208 (2020)
Senapati, T., Yager, R.R.: Fermatean fuzzy sets. J. Ambient. Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 11, 663–674 (2019)
Kamali Saraji, M., Streimikiene, D., Kyriakopoulos, G.L.: Fermatean fuzzy CRITIC-COPRAS method for evaluating the challenges to industry 4.0 adoption for a sustainable digital transformation. Sustainability 13, 9577 (2021)
Shahzadi, G., Akram, M.: Group decision-making for the selection of an antivirus mask under fermatean fuzzy soft information. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 1–16 (2021)
Rani, P., Mishra, A.R.: Fermatean fuzzy einstein aggregation operators-based MULTIMOORA method for electric vehicle charging station selection. Expert Syst. Appl. 115267 (2021)
Mishra, A.R., Rani, P.: Multi-criteria healthcare waste disposal location selection based on Fermatean fuzzy WASPAS method. Compl. Intell. Syst. 1–16 (2021)
Akram, M., Shahzadi, G., Ahmadini, A.A.H.: Decision-making framework for an effective sanitizer to reduce COVID-19 under fermatean fuzzy environment. J. Math. (2020)
Aydemir, S.B., Yilmaz Gunduz, S.: Fermatean fuzzy TOPSIS method with dombi aggregation operators and its application in multi-criteria decision making. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 39, 851–869 (2020)
Garg, H., Shahzadi, G., Akram, M.: Decision-making analysis based on Fermatean fuzzy Yager aggregation operators with application in COVID-19 testing facility. Mathe. Prob. Eng. (2020)
Liu, D., Liu, Y., Wang, L.: Distance measure for Fermatean fuzzy linguistic term sets based on linguistic scale function: an illustration of the TODIM and TOPSIS methods. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 34, 2807–2834 (2019)
Senapati, T., Yager, R.R.: Some new operations over Fermatean fuzzy numbers and application of Fermatean fuzzy WPM in multiple criteria decision making. Informatica 30, 391–412 (2019)
Senapati, T., Yager, R.R.: Fermatean fuzzy weighted averaging/geometric operators and its application in multi-criteria decision-making methods. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 85, 112–121 (2019)
Taamallah, A., Khemaja, M., Faiz, S.: Towards a framework for participatory strategy design in smart cities. In: Proceedings of the the Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Smart City Applications, pp. 179–192
Ahvenniemi, H., Huovila, A., Pinto-Seppä, I., Airaksinen, M.: What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities? Cities 60, 234–245 (2017)
Wu, Y., Zhang, W., Shen, J., Mo, Z., Peng, Y.: Smart city with Chinese characteristics against the background of big data: idea, action and risk. J. Clean. Prod. 173, 60–66 (2018)
Vu, K., Hartley, K.: Promoting smart cities in developing countries: policy insights from Vietnam. Telecommun. Pol. 42, 845–859 (2018)
Chen, Y., Ardila-Gomez, A., Frame, G.: Achieving energy savings by intelligent transportation systems investments in the context of smart cities. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 54, 381–396 (2017)
Hoelscher, K.: The evolution of the smart cities agenda in India. Int. Area Stud. Rev. 19, 28–44 (2016)
Tan, S.Y., Taeihagh, A.: Smart city governance in developing countries: a systematic literature review. Sustainability 12, 899 (2020)
Chang, I.-C.C.: Actually existing sustainabilities. In: Urban China: national initiatives and local contestations. Sustainab. J. Rec. 11:216–228 (2018)
Mboup, G.; Oyelaran-Oyeyinka, B.: Relevance of smart economy in smart cities in Africa. In: Smart Economy in Smart African Cities; Springer, pp. 1–49 (2019)
Wenge, R., Zhang, X., Dave, C., Chao, L., Hao, S.: Smart city architecture: a technology guide for implementation and design challenges. China Commun. 11, 56–69 (2014)
Warwick, K.: Beyond industrial policy: emerging issues and new trends (2013)
Kumar, H., Singh, M.K., Gupta, M., Madaan, J.: Moving towards smart cities: solutions that lead to the smart city transformation framework. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 153, 119281 (2020)
Peng, G.C.A., Nunes, M.B., Zheng, L.: Impacts of low citizen awareness and usage in smart city services: the case of London’s smart parking system. IseB 15, 845–876 (2017)
Praharaj, S., Han, J.H., Hawken, S.: Innovative civic engagement and digital urban infrastructure: lessons from 100 smart cities mission in India. Proc. Eng. 180, 1423–1432 (2017)
Kumar, A.: Can the smart city allure meet the challenges of Indian urbanization? In: Sustainable Smart Cities in India. Springer, pp. 17–39 (2017)
Mohanty, S.P., Choppali, U., Kougianos, E.: Everything you wanted to know about smart cities: the internet of things is the backbone. IEEE Consumer Electron. Magaz. 5, 60–70 (2016)
Nam, T., Pardo, T.A.: Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In: Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times, pp. 282–291 (2011)
Ismagilova, E., Hughes, L., Rana, N.P., Dwivedi, Y.K.: Security, privacy and risks within smart cities: Literature review and development of a smart city interaction framework. Inf. Syst. Front. 1–22 (2020)
Habibzadeh, H., Soyata, T., Kantarci, B., Boukerche, A., Kaptan, C.: Sensing, communication and security planes: a new challenge for a smart city system design. Comput. Netw. 144, 163–200 (2018)
Peprah, C., Amponsah, O., Oduro, C.: A system view of smart mobility and its implications for Ghanaian cities. Sustain. Cities Soc. 44, 739–747 (2019)
Mishra, A.K.: Henry George and Mohring-Harwitz theorems: lessons for financing smart cities in developing countries. Environ. Urban. ASIA 10, 13–30 (2019)
Vadgama, C.V., Khutwad, A., Damle, M., Patil, S.: Smart funding options for developing smart cities: a proposal for India. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 8, 1–12 (2015)
Lam, P.T., Yang, W.: Factors influencing the consideration of public-private partnerships (PPP) for smart city projects: evidence from Hong Kong. Cities 99, 102606 (2020)
Alim, S., Polak, J.: Public–private partnerships for future urban infrastructure. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-management, Procurement and Law, vol. 169, pp. 150–158 (2016)
Chen, H., Zhao, C., Shen, Z.: Analysis of the problems of current smart city and countermeasures in China. In: Proceedings of the 2018 3rd Technology Innovation Management and Engineering Science International Conference (TIMES-iCON), pp. 1–4 (2018)
Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Hashemi-Tabatabaei, M., Zavadskas, E.K., Kaklauskas, A.: A new decision-making approach based on fermatean fuzzy sets and WASPAS for green construction supplier evaluation. Mathematics 8, 2202 (2020)
Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J.: Determination of objective weights using a new method based on the removal effects of criteria (MEREC). Symmetry 13, 525 (2021)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kamali Saraji, M., Streimikiene, D. (2023). A Novel Extended Fermatean Fuzzy Framework for Evaluating the Challenges to Sustainable Smart City Development. In: Sahoo, L., Senapati, T., Yager, R.R. (eds) Real Life Applications of Multiple Criteria Decision Making Techniques in Fuzzy Domain. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 420. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4929-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4929-6_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-4928-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-4929-6
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)