Abstract
Objective—To examine the efficiency of description strategies people used in collaborative spatial tasks. Methods—Study1 asked participants (N = 30) to describe the location of specific objects under different spatial conditions. The experimental conditions contained different spatial layouts (regular, irregular) and visibility of the interactive partner’s perspective (available, unavailable). We recorded all the utterances and categorized them by the description strategies involved. Study2 tested the efficiency of these strategies. Participants (N = 30) were guided by different kinds of descriptions to make spatial judgments. Results— (1) There are four spatial description strategies most commonly used: Addressee-centered, Exocentric, Object-based and Egocentric. (2) Participants’ spontaneous descriptions were affected by their partner’s viewpoint. When the partner's viewpoint is unavailable, they tend to represent spatial information exocentrically. (3) Organizing spatial instructions in an exocentric way led to better task performance. Conclusion—If the collaborators have common cognition of spatial directions and references, exocentric reference frame could maximize the efficiency of spatial interactions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
May, M., Wendt, M.: Visual perspective taking and laterality decisions: problems and possible solutions. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7, 549 (2013)
Sisbot, E.A., Ros, R., Alami, R.: Situation assessment for human-robot interactive object manipulation, pp.15–20 (2011)
Ros, R., Lemaignan, S., Sisbot, E.A., et al.: Which one grounding the referent based on efficient human-robot interaction, pp. 570–575 (2010)
Xiao Chengli, F.Y., Xu, L., Zhou, R.: Human-centered human-robot natural spatial language interaction (2019)
Trafton, J.G., Cassimatis, N.L., Bugajska, M.D., et al.: Enabling effective human-robot interaction using perspective-taking in robots. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. - Part A: Syst. Hum. 35(4), 460–470 (2005)
Li, P., Abarbanell, L.: Competing perspectives on frames of reference in language and thought. Cognition 170, 9–24 (2018)
Tversky, B., Hard, B.M.: Embodied and disembodied cognition: spatial perspective-taking. Cognition 110(1), 124–129 (2009)
Tosi, A., Pickering, M.J., Branigan, H.P.: Speakers’ use of agency and visual context in spatial descriptions. Cognition 194, 104070 (2020)
Tversky, B., Lee, P., Mainwaring, S.: Why do speakers mix perspectives? Spat. Cogn. Comput. 1(4), 399–412 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010091730257
Mou, W., Zhao, M., McNamara, T.P.: Layout geometry in the selection of intrinsic frames of reference from multiple viewpoints. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 33(1), 145–154 (2007)
Gramann, K.: Embodiment of spatial reference frames and individual differences in reference frame proclivity. Spat. Cogn. Comput. 13(1), 1–25 (2013)
Li, J., Su, X., Wang, Y., et al.: The effect of different object orientation conditions on the construction of intrinsic frame of reference system in virtual scene. J. Psychol. Sci. 40(6), 1322–1327 (2017)
Mainwaring, S.D., Tversky, B., Ohgishi, M., et al.: Descriptions of simple spatial scenes in English and Japanese. Spat. Cogn. Comput. 3(1), 3–42 (2003)
Duran, N.D., Dale, R., Kreuz, R.J.: Listeners invest in an assumed other’s perspective despite cognitive cost. Cognition 121(1), 22–40 (2011)
Galati, A., Michael, C., Mello, C., et al.: The conversational partner’s perspective affects spatial memory and descriptions. J. Mem. Lang. 68(2), 140–159 (2013)
Liu Lihong, Z.J., Huiping, W.: The effect of spatial language habits on people’s spatial cognition. Acta Psychol. Sin. 37(04), 469–475 (2005)
Acknowledgement
This work is supported by the Space Medical Experiment Project of China Manned Space Program (No. HYZHXM03001), and Funding Project of National Key Laboratory of Human Factors Engineering (No. SYFD061902, No. SYFD061903).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
The study was approved by the Department of Psychology, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University. All subjects who participated in the experiment were provided with and signed an informed consent form. All relevant ethical safeguards have been met with regard to subject protection.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zhu, Y. et al. (2023). Description Strategy Selection in Collaborative Spatial Tasks. In: Long, S., Dhillon, B.S. (eds) Man-Machine-Environment System Engineering. MMESE 2022. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 941. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4786-5_59
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4786-5_59
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-4785-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-4786-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)