Skip to main content

Steel–Concrete-Steel Sandwich Panel Under Simulated Blast Loading

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Innovations in Impact and Blast Protections
  • 223 Accesses

Abstract

The performance of non-composite steel–concrete-steel (SCS) sandwich panels under simulated blast loading was experimentally and numerically studied. Two SCS sandwich panels with different concrete depths were tested, and the simulated blast loading was applied by utilizing an inflated airbag to transmit the impact force from the dropped hammer onto the panels in the form of uniform pressure loading. The deformation modes, applied pressures, displacement and strain responses of the panels were obtained from the tests. A combination of flexure and shear deformation mode was observed for the SCS panel with thinner concrete core while there was minimal visible deformation for the thicker panel. The maximum and permanent deformations of the panel with thicker concrete were significantly reduced owing to the increase in resistance and mass. Debonding between concrete core and bottom plate was also observed for the tested panels. Following the test, Finite Element (FE) models were established and verified against the test data. It was shown in the FE analysis that the steel plates dissipated more energy owing to its higher strength and ductility as compared to the concrete core.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abramowicz W, Jones N (1986) Dynamic progressive buckling of circular and square tubes. Int J Impact Eng 4:243–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anandavalli N, Lakshmanan N, Rajasankar J et al (2012) Numerical studies on blast loaded steel–concrete composite panels. JCES 1(3):102–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora H, Hooper PA, Dear JP (2011) Dynamic response of full–scale sandwich composite structures subject to air–blast loading. Compos: Part A 42:1651–1662

    Google Scholar 

  • ASCE (2010) Design of blast–resistant buildings in petrochemical facilities. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia

    Google Scholar 

  • ASCE (2011) Blast protection of buildings. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baker WE (1973) Explosions in air. University of Texas Press, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Hao H (2014) Experimental investigations and numerical simulations of multi–arch double–layered panels under uniform impulsive loadings. Int J Impact Eng 63:140–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Hao H, Chen S (2015) Numerical analysis of prestressed reinforced concrete beam subjected to blast loading. Mater Des 65:662–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clubley SK (2014) Non–linear long duration blast loading of cylindrical shell structures. Eng Struct 59:113–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford JE, Lan S (2006) Blast barrier design and testing. In: Proceedings of the ASCE Structures Congress, St. Louis, Missour

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford JE, Wu Y, Magallanes JM et al (2012) Modeling of concrete materials under extreme loads. Advances in Protective Structures Research, Taylor & Francis Group, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Foglar M, Kovar M (2013) Conclusions from experimental testing of blast resistance of FRC and RC bridge decks. Int J Impact Eng 59:18–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grote DL, Park SW, Zhou M (2001) Dynamic behavior of concrete at high strain rate and pressure: I. experimental characterization. Int J Impact Eng 25:869–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallquist JO (2006) LS-DYNA theory manual. Livermore Software Technology Corporation (LSTC). Livermore, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallquist JO (2012) LS-DYNA keyword user’s manual. Livermore, California: Livermore Software Technology Corporation. Livermore, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou S, Zhao S, Ren L et al (2013) Crashworthiness optimization of corrugated sandwich panels. Mater Des 51:1071–1084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde D (1991) Conventional Weapons programm (ConWep). US Army Waterways Experimental Station, Vicksbure

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishiguro S (2007) Experiments and analyses of fracture properties of grouting mortars. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on fracture mechanics of concrete and concrete structures

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang H, Wang X, He S (2012) Numerical simulation of impact tests on reinforced concrete beams. Mater Des; 39:11–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jing L, Xi C, Wang Z et al (2013) Energy absorption and failure mechanism of metallic cylindrical sandwich shells under impact loading. Mater Des 52: 470–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones N (1988) Structural impact. Cambridge University Press, NewYork

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilicaslan C, Guden M, Odaci IK et al (2012), The impact responses and the finite element modeling of layered trapezoidal corrugated aluminum core and aluminum sheet interlayer sandwich structures. Mater Des 46:121–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacroix DN, Doudak G, EI–Domiaty K (2014) Retrofit options for light–frame wood stud walls subjected to blast loading. J Struct Eng 140(4):04013104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lan S, Lok TS, Heng L (2005) Composite structural panels subjected to explosive loading. Constr Build Mater 19:387–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liew JYR, Sohel KMA (2009) Lightweight steel–concrete–steel sandwich system with J–hook connectors. Eng Struct 31(5):1166–1178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liew JYR, Wang TY (2011) Novel steel–concrete–steel sandwich composite plates subjected to impact and blast load. Adv Struct En 14(4):673–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liew JYR, Sohel KMA, Koh CG (2009) Impact tests on steel–concrete–steel sandwich beams with lightweight concrete core. Eng Struct 31(9):2045–2059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin X, Zhang YX, Hazell PJ (2014) Modelling the response of reinforced concrete panels under blast loading. Mater Des 56:620–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magallanes JM, Wu Y, Malvar LJ et al (2010) Recent improvements to release III of the K&C concrete model. In: the 11th international LS–DYNA users conference

    Google Scholar 

  • Malvar LJ, Crawford JE, Wesevich JW et al (1997) A plasticity concrete material model for DYNA3D. Int J Impact Eng 19:847–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao L, Barnett S, Begg D et al (2014) Numerical simulation of ultra high performance of fibre reinforced concrete panel subjected to blast loading. Int J Impact Eng; 64:91–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mostaghel N (2003) Blast load simulation system. US Patent US06536258B1, 25 Mar 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Remennikov AM, Liew JYR, Kong SY et al (2009) Simulation of impulsive loading on columns using an inflatable airbag technique. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Shock & Impact Loads on Structures, Adelaide, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Remennikov AM, Kong SY (2012) Numerical simulation and validation of impact response of axially–restrained steel–concrete–steel sandwich panels. Compo Struct 94:3546–3555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross CA, Thompson PY, Tedesco JW (1989) Split–Hopkinson pressure–bar tests on concrete and mortar in tension and compression. ACI Mater J 86(5):475–481

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleyer GK, Lowak MJ, Polcyn MA et al (2007) Experimental investigation of blast wall panels under shock pressure loading. Int J Impact Eng 34:1095–1118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith SJ, McCann DM, Kamara ME (2009) Blast resistant design guide for reinforced concrete structures. Portland Cement Association, Skokie

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith PD, Hetheringtom JG (1994) Blast and ballistic loading of structures. Butterworth–Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohel KMA, Liew JYR (2011) Steel–concrete–steel sandwich slabs with lightweight core–static performance. Eng Struct 33(3):981–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symonds PS (1967) Survey of methods of analysis for plastic deformation of structures under dynamic loading. Division of Engineering Report BU/NSRDC/1–67, Brown University

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabatabaei ZS, Volz JS, Baird J et al (2013) Experimental and numerical analyses of long carbon fiber reinforced concrete panels exposed to blast loading. Int J Impact Eng 57:70–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UFC 3–340–02 (2008) Structures to resist the effects of accidental explosions. US Department of Army, Navy and the Air Force, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Liew JYR, Lee SC (2015a) Experimental and numeri-cal studies of non-composite Steel-Concrete-Steel sandwich panels under impulsive loading. Mater Des 81:104–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Liew JYR, Lee SC (2015b) Theoretical models for axi-ally restrained steel–concrete–steel sandwich panels under blast loading. Int J Impact Eng 6:221–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Chew SH (2014), Field performance and numerical modeling of multi–layer pavement system subject to blast load. Constr Build Mater 52:177–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhai X, Wang Y (2013) Modelling and dynamic response of steel reticulated shell under blast loading. Shock Vib 20(1):19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhai X, Wang Y, Huang M (2013) Performance and protection approach of single–layer reticulated dome subjected to blast loading. Thin-Walled Struct 73:57–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yonghui Wang .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wang, Y. (2023). Steel–Concrete-Steel Sandwich Panel Under Simulated Blast Loading. In: Innovations in Impact and Blast Protections. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4375-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4375-1_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-4374-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-4375-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics