Skip to main content

Changing Paradigm in the Diagnosis and Management of Keratoconus

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Keratoconus

Abstract

Keratoconus is a corneal ectatic disorder that was described more than 150 years ago. Originally thought to be a rare disease, it is now known to be much more common. Advancements of refractive surgeries have made it crucial to diagnose keratoconus in early stages to prevent post-refractive surgery ectasia. The past 30 years have seen a revolution in the field of corneal imaging and diagnosis of keratoconus. As our understanding of the disease increases, more and more options of treatment are being explored. This chapter gives an overview of the advancements in diagnosis and management of keratoconus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ferrari G, Rama P. The keratoconus enigma: a review with emphasis on pathogenesis. Ocul Surf. 2020;18(3):363–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gorskova EN, Sevost’ianov EN. Epidemiology of keratoconus in the Urals. Vestnik Oftalmologii. 1998;114(4):38–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Fotouhi A. Topographic keratoconus is not rare in an Iranian population: the Tehran eye study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2013;20(6):385–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shilpy N, Shah Z, Singh S, Purohit D. Prevalence of keratoconus in refractive surgery cases in Western India. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2020;27(3):156–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Jonas JB, Nangia V, Matin A, Kulkarni M, Bhojwani K. Prevalence and associations of keratoconus in rural Maharashtra in Central India: the Central India eye and medical study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148(5):760–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Xu L, Wang YX, Guo Y, You QS, Jonas JB, Beijing Eye Study Group. Prevalence and associations of steep cornea/keratoconus in Greater Beijing. The Beijing Eye Study. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e39313.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Waked N, Fayad AM, Fadlallah A, El Rami H. Dépistage du kératocône dans une population universitaire au Liban [Keratoconus screening in a Lebanese students’ population]. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2012;35(1):23–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Millodot M, Shneor E, Albou S, Atlani E, Gordon-Shaag A. Prevalence and associated factors of keratoconus in Jerusalem: a cross-sectional study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2011;18(2):91–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shehadeh MM, Diakonis VF, Jalil SA, Younis R, Qadoumi J, Al-Labadi L. Prevalence of keratoconus among a Palestinian tertiary student population. Open Ophthalmol J. 2015;9:172–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Godefrooij DA, de Wit GA, Uiterwaal CS, Imhof SM, Wisse RP. Age-specific incidence and prevalence of keratoconus: a Nationwide registration study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;175:169–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kennedy RH, Bourne WM, Dyer JA. A 48-year clinical and epidemiologic study of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 1986;101(3):267–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Torres Netto EA, Al-Otaibi WM, Hafezi NL, Kling S, Al-Farhan HM, Randleman JB, Hafezi F. Prevalence of keratoconus in paediatric patients in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018;102(10):1436–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Papaliʼi-Curtin AT, Cox R, Ma T, Woods L, Covello A, Hall RC. Keratoconus prevalence among high school students in New Zealand. Cornea. 2019;38(11):1382–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zadnik K, Barr JT, Edrington TB, Everett DF, Jameson M, McMahon TT, Shin JA, Sterling JL, Wagner H, Gordon MO. Baseline findings in the collaborative longitudinal evaluation of keratoconus (CLEK) study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39(13):2537–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang Y, Rabinowitz YS, Rotter JI, Yang H. Genetic epidemiological study of keratoconus: evidence for major gene determination. Am J Med Genet. 2000;93(5):403–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gordon-Shaag A, Millodot M, Essa M, Garth J, Ghara M, Shneor E. Is consanguinity a risk factor for keratoconus? Optom Vis Sci. 2013;90(5):448–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shneor E, Millodot M, Gordon-Shaag A, Essa M, Anton M, Barbara R, Barbara A. Prevalence of keratoconus among young Arab students in Israel. Int J Keratoconus Ectatic Corneal Dis. 2014;3(1):9–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tuft SJ, Hassan H, George S, Frazer DG, Willoughby CE, Liskova P. Keratoconus in 18 pairs of twins. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012;90(6):e482–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gordon-Shaag A, Millodot M, Shneor E, Liu Y. The genetic and environmental factors for keratoconus. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:795738.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Leahy A. Keratoscopy. Ind Med Gaz. 1884;19(7):184–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Placido A. Novo instrumento de exploração da córnea. Periodico d’Oftalmológica Practica. 1880;5:27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Reynolds AE, Kratt HJ. The photo-electronic keratoscope. Contacto. 1959;3:53–9.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rowsey JJ, Reynolds AE, Brown R. Corneal topography. Corneascope. Arch Ophthalmol. 1981;99(6):1093–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cairns G, McGhee CN. Orbscan computerized topography: attributes, applications, and limitations. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(1):205–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dubbelman M, Sicam VA, Van der Heijde GL. The shape of the anterior and posterior surface of the aging human cornea. Vis Res. 2006;46(6–7):993–1001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Piñero DP, Plaza AB, Alió JL. Anterior segment biometry with 2 imaging technologies: very-high-frequency ultrasound scanning versus optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(1):95–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Maeda N, Klyce SD, Smolek MK, Thompson HW. Automated keratoconus screening with corneal topography analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35(6):2749–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ambrósio R Jr, Dawson DG, Salomão M, Guerra FP, Caiado AL, Belin MW. Corneal ectasia after LASIK despite low preoperative risk: tomographic and biomechanical findings in the unoperated, stable, fellow eye. J Refract Surg. 2010;26(11):906–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. Stability of LASIK in topographically suspect keratoconus confirmed non-keratoconic by Artemis VHF digital ultrasound epithelial thickness mapping: 1-year follow-up. J Refract Surg. 2009;25(7):569–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Li Y, Chamberlain W, Tan O, Brass R, Weiss JL, Huang D. Subclinical keratoconus detection by pattern analysis of corneal and epithelial thickness maps with optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(2):284–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Pahuja N, Shroff R, Pahanpate P, Francis M, Veeboy L, Shetty R, Nuijts RMMA, Sinha RA. Application of high resolution OCT to evaluate irregularity of Bowman’s layer in asymmetric keratoconus. J Biophotonics. 2017;10(5):701–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ambrósio R Jr, Nogueira LP, Caldas DL, Fontes BM, Luz A, Cazal JO, Alves MR, Belin MW. Evaluation of corneal shape and biomechanics before LASIK. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2011;51(2):11–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Roberts CJ, Dupps WJ Jr. Biomechanics of corneal ectasia and biomechanical treatments. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40(6):991–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Luz A, Lopes B, Hallahan KM, Valbon B, Fontes B, Schor P, Dupps WJ Jr, Ambrósio R Jr. Discriminant value of custom ocular response analyzer waveform derivatives in Forme Fruste keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;164:14–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Luz A, Lopes B, Hallahan KM, Valbon B, Ramos I, Faria-Correia F, Schor P, Dupps WJ Jr, Ambrósio R Jr. Enhanced combined tomography and biomechanics data for distinguishing Forme Fruste keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2016;32(7):479–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Ambrósio R Jr, Lopes B, Faria-Correia F, Vinciguerra R, Vinciguerra P, Elsheikh A, Roberts CJ. Ectasia detection by the assessment of corneal biomechanics. Cornea. 2016;35(7):e18–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Salomão MQ, Hofling-Lima AL, Faria-Correia F, Lopes BT, Rodrigues-Barros S, Roberts CJ, Ambrósio R. Dynamic corneal deformation response and integrated corneal tomography. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018;66(3):373–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Vinciguerra R, Ambrósio R Jr, Elsheikh A, Roberts CJ, Lopes B, Morenghi E, Azzolini C, Vinciguerra P. Detection of keratoconus with a new biomechanical index. J Refract Surg. 2016;32(12):803–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ambrósio R Jr, Lopes BT, Faria-Correia F, Salomão MQ, Bühren J, Roberts CJ, Elsheikh A, Vinciguerra R, Vinciguerra P. Integration of Scheimpflug-based corneal tomography and biomechanical assessments for enhancing ectasia detection. J Refract Surg. 2017;33(7):434–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Scarcelli G, Besner S, Pineda R, Yun SH. Biomechanical characterization of keratoconus corneas ex vivo with Brillouin microscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(7):4490–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Seiler T. The paradigm change in keratoconus therapy. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2013;61(8):381.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Riboflavin/ultraviolet-a-induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135(5):620–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Rubinfeld RS, Caruso C, Ostacolo C. Corneal cross-linking: the science beyond the myths and misconceptions. Cornea. 2019;38(6):780–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Mazzotta C, Traversi C, Caragiuli S, Rechichi M. Pulsed vs continuous light accelerated corneal collagen crosslinking: in vivo qualitative investigation by confocal microscopy and corneal OCT. Eye (Lond). 2014;28(10):1179–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Sun L, Li M, Zhang X, Tian M, Han T, Zhao J, Zhou X. Transepithelial accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking with higher oxygen availability for keratoconus: 1-year results. Int Ophthalmol. 2018;38(6):2509–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Mazzotta C, Sgheri A, Bagaglia SA, Rechichi M, Di Maggio A. Customized corneal crosslinking for treatment of progressive keratoconus: clinical and OCT outcomes using a transepithelial approach with supplemental oxygen. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46(12):1582–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Vinciguerra P, Rosetta P, Legrottaglie EF, Morenghi E, Mazzotta C, Kaye SB, Vinciguerra R. Iontophoresis CXL with and without epithelial debridement versus standard CXL: 2-year clinical results of a prospective clinical study. J Refract Surg. 2019;35(3):184–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Mazzotta C, Bagaglia SA, Sgheri A, Di Maggio A, Fruschelli M, Romani A, Vinciguerra R, Vinciguerra P, Tosi GM. Iontophoresis corneal cross-linking with enhanced Fluence and pulsed UV-A light: 3-year clinical results. J Refract Surg. 2020;36(5):286–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Aytekin E, Öztürk N, Vural İ, Polat HK, Çakmak HB, Çalış S, Pehlivan SB. Design of ocular drug delivery platforms and in vitro - in vivo evaluation of riboflavin to the cornea by non-interventional (epi-on) technique for keratoconus treatment. J Control Release. 2020;324:238–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Lidich N, Garti-Levy S, Aserin A, Garti N. Potentiality of microemulsion systems in treatment of ophthalmic disorders: keratoconus and dry eye syndrome - in vivo study. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2019;173:226–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Deshmukh R, Hafezi F, Kymionis GD, Kling S, Shah R, Padmanabhan P, Sachdev MS. Current concepts in crosslinking thin corneas. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019;67(1):8–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Hashemi H, Alvani A, Seyedian MA, Yaseri M, Khabazkhoob M, Esfandiari H. Appropriate sequence of combined Intracorneal ring implantation and corneal collagen cross-linking in keratoconus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cornea. 2018;37(12):1601–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Yang X, Liu Q, Feng Q, Lin H. Safety and efficacy of corneal minimized-volume ablation with accelerated cross-linking in improving visual function for keratoconus. Cornea. 2020;39(12):1485–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Iselin KC, Baenninger PB, Bachmann LM, Bochmann F, Thiel MA, Kaufmann C. Changes in higher order aberrations after central corneal regularization - a comparative two-year analysis of a semi-automated topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy combined with corneal cross-linking. Eye Vis (Lond). 2020;7:10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Kaiserman I, Mimouni M, Rabina G. Epithelial photorefractive keratectomy and corneal cross-linking for keratoconus: the Tel-Aviv protocol. J Refract Surg. 2019;35(6):377–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Parker JS, van Dijk K, Melles GR. Treatment options for advanced keratoconus: a review. Surv Ophthalmol. 2015;60(5):459–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Tong CM, van Dijk K, Melles GRJ. Update on Bowman layer transplantation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2019;30(4):249–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Dapena I, Parker JS, Melles GRJ. Potential benefits of modified corneal tissue grafts for keratoconus: Bowman layer ‘inlay’ and ‘onlay’ transplantation, and allogenic tissue ring segments. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2020;31(4):276–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Jin H, He M, Liu H, Zhong X, Wu J, Liu L, Ding H, Zhang C, Zhong X. Small-incision femtosecond laser-assisted Intracorneal concave Lenticule implantation in patients with keratoconus. Cornea. 2019;38(4):446–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Mastropasqua L, Nubile M, Salgari N, Mastropasqua R. Femtosecond laser-assisted stromal Lenticule addition Keratoplasty for the treatment of advanced keratoconus: a preliminary study. J Refract Surg. 2018;34(1):36–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Alió Del Barrio JL, El Zarif M, Azaar A, Makdissy N, Khalil C, Harb W, El Achkar I, Jawad ZA, de Miguel MP, Alió JL. Corneal stroma enhancement with Decellularized stromal laminas with or without stem cell Recellularization for advanced keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018;186:47–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pravin K. Vaddavalli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Deshmukh, R.S., Vaddavalli, P.K. (2022). Changing Paradigm in the Diagnosis and Management of Keratoconus. In: Das, S. (eds) Keratoconus. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4262-4_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4262-4_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-4261-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-4262-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics