Skip to main content

Experimental Investigation on Fly Ash and Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag-Based Geopolymer Corbels

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Advances in Structural Engineering and Construction Management

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 277))

  • 552 Accesses

Abstract

Cement is most consumed material after water (Gagg in Engineering Failure Analysis 40:114–140, 2014) due to the phenomenal growth in infrastructure, etc., which leads to huge consumption of cement as a building material. In this respect, geopolymer concrete can prove to be a decisive solution for the concrete industry as it can replace conventional cement in concrete. It also focuses on the disposal of industrial waste such as fly ash and ground granular blast furnace slag (GGBS) for use as a binder due to its chemical action with catalytic alkaline activator solutions to form inorganic molecules. Fifteen reinforced geopolymer concrete corbels with concrete grade M40 and different percentages of secondary reinforcement were cast and tested. Experimental shear strength test results are associated with several analytical and design codes. The test results showed that the strength in shear for geopolymer concrete was underestimated established on OPC concrete models. Most of analytical models are conservative in envisaging the shear capacity of GPC corbels. However, Hagberg (1983) and Euro Code 2 (2004) predict the best shear performance for GPC corbels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Davidovits, J. (1991). Geopolymers: Inorganic polymeric new materials. Journal of Thermal Analysis and calorimetry, 37(8), 1633–1656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fernández-Jiménez, A., García-Lodeiro, I., & Palomo, A. (2007). Durability of alkali-activated fly ash cementitious materials. Journal of Materials Science, 42(9), 3055–3065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mattock, A. H., Chen, K. C., & Soongswang, K. (1976). The behavior of reinforced concrete corbels. PCI Journal, 21(2), 52–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kriz, L. B., & Raths, C. H. (1965). Connections in precast concrete structures: strength of corbels.

    Google Scholar 

  5. BIS 3812. (2003). Specification for fly ash for use as pozzolana and admixture, (Bureau of Indian Standards).

    Google Scholar 

  6. BIS 12089. (1999). Indian standard specifications for granulated slag for the manufacture of Portland slag cement, (Bureau of Indian Standards).

    Google Scholar 

  7. BIS 383. (2016). Course and fine aggregate for concrete–Specification. (Bureau of Indian Standards).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bhupinder, S., Mohammadi, Y., & Kaushik, S. K. (2005). Design of a double corbel using the strut-and-tie method. (pp. 21–33).

    Google Scholar 

  9. ACI Committee 318. (2014). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318–14) and Commentary (ACI 318R-14). American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Standard, C.S.A., A23.3. (2014). Design of concrete structures (sixth edition). Canadian Standards Association.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Handbook, PCI. (2010). Precast. Prestressed Concrete Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hagberg, T. (1983). Design of concrete brackets: on the application of the truss analogy. Journal Proceedings, 80(1), 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Euro code 2. (2004). Design of concrete structures—Part 1–1: General rules and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization, Avenue Marnix 17, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium. 225 p. (with corrigendum dated of 16 January 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gagg, C. R. (2014). Cement and concrete as an engineering material: An historic appraisal and case study analysis. Engineering Failure Analysis, 40, 114–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. BSI, British Standard. “8110–1: .(1997). Structural use of concrete–Part 1: Code of practice for design and construction”.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rao, G. M., et al. (2016). Mix proportioning of geopolymer concrete. Cement Wapno Beton, 21(4), 274–285.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Sumanth Kumar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kumar, B.S. (2023). Experimental Investigation on Fly Ash and Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag-Based Geopolymer Corbels. In: Hau, K.K., Gupta, A.K., Chaudhary, S., Gupta, T. (eds) Recent Advances in Structural Engineering and Construction Management . Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 277. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4040-8_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4040-8_45

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-4039-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-4040-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics