Abstract
Punching shear failure is one of the main types of failure observed in the flat slab–column connections. In the present research work, numerical and experimental investigations were carried out to study the behaviour of exterior slab–column connection with various shear reinforcements in linear and critical patterns under lateral cyclic loading. Four types of specimens were analysed, conventional specimen (SC-NS), specimen with stud shear reinforcement in critical pattern (SC-SSRC), specimen with single-loop stirrups in linear pattern (SC-SLS) and specimen with closed-hoop stirrups in linear pattern (SC-CHS). The scaled model (1/4th scale) was tested under axial loading at the top of the column stub, and cyclic loading is given at the slab end. All the models with slab shear reinforcements (SC-SSRC, SC-SLS and SC-CHS) proved to be effective in resisting punching shear failure under axial and cyclic loading. The presence of shear reinforcements (SC-SSRC, SC-SLS and SC-CHS) significantly increased ductility compared to that of conventional specimen (SC-NS).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ABAQUS/Explicit User’s Manual. (2002). Version 6.14. Hibbitt, Karlson & Sorensen, Inc.
ACI Committee 318. (2005). Building code requirement for structural concrete (ACI 318M-05) and commentary. American Concrete Institute.
Broms, C. K. (2007). Flat plates in seismic areas: Comparison of shear reinforcement systems. ACI Structural Journal, 104, 712–721.
Bu, P. (2009).Ductility of reinforced concrete flat slab-column connections. Computer–Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 20, 184–193.
Bompa, D. V., & Elghazouli, A. Y. (2020). Nonlinear numerical simulation of punching shear behavior of reinforced concrete flat slabs with shear-heads. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 14(2), 331–356.
Eurocode 2. (2004). Design of concrete structures, part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings (p. 225). European Standards, CEN, EN1992-1-1, Brussels, Belgium.
Girish, N., & Lingeswaran, N. (2018). A comparative study of flat slabs using different shear reinforcement parameters. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(2.20), 321–325.
IS 1893(Part 1).(2016). Indian Standard Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
IS 456-2000:(2000). Indian Standard Plain and Reinforced concrete code of practice. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
IS 13920,(1993). Indian Standard Code of practice for ductile detailing of Reinforced Concrete structures subjected to seismic forces, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.
Kirk, W., & Kawai, T. (1982). Shear reinforcement at slab column connections in a reinforced concrete at plate structure. ACI Structural Journal, 79, 36–42.
Lee, J., & Fenves, G. L. (1998). Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of reinforced concrete structures. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 124(8), 892–900.
Lim, F. K., & Rangan, B. V. (1995). Studies on concrete slabs with stud shear reinforcement in vicinity of edge and corner columns. ACI Structural Journal, 92, 515–525.
Mokhatar, S. N., & Abdullah, A. V. (2012). Computational analysis of reinforced concrete slab under impact loads. International Journal of Engineering, 4(2), 70–76.
Park, R., & Paulay, T. (1975). Reinforced concrete structures. Wiley–Inter Science Publication.
Polak, M. A. (2005). Ductility of reinforced concrete flat slab column connection. Computer–Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 20, 184–193.
Qi, Z., & Hussain, A. (2004). Modelling slab–column connections reinforced with GFRP under localized impact. In Proceedings in the international conference, Future vision and challenge for urban development Cairo, Egpyt (pp. 46–52).
Robertson, I. N., Kawai, T., Lee, J., & Enomoto, B. (2002). Cyclic testing of slab–column connections with shear reinforcement. ACI Structural Journal, 99, 605–613.
Regan, P. E. (1984). Behavior of reinforced concrete flat slabs. CIRIA Report, 89, 1–89.
Rafiee, S., & Marefat, M. S. (2020). Experimental and numerical evaluation of new seismic details for connection of post-tensioned flat slabs to edge steel columns. Current Trends in Civil & Structural Engineering, 6(4) CTCSE.MS.ID.000645.
Surumi, R. S., Jaya, K. P., & Greeshma, S. (2015). Numerical evaluation of structural wall–flat slab connection. Journal of Gradevinar, 67(7), 663–672.
Viswanathan, T. S., Mohan Ganesh, G., & Santhi, A. S. (2014). Investigation of shear stud performance in flat plate using finite element analysis. Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences, 46(3), 328–341.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Suganya, K.N., Greeshma, S. (2023). Behaviour of Slab–Column Joint Under Lateral Cyclic Loading. In: Hau, K.K., Gupta, A.K., Chaudhary, S., Gupta, T. (eds) Recent Advances in Structural Engineering and Construction Management . Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 277. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4040-8_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4040-8_28
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-4039-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-4040-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)