Skip to main content

Organizational Change and Enterprise Architecture Adoption: A Case Study in the Public Sector

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Information Systems Research in Vietnam

Abstract

Enterprise architecture (EA) adoption initiates broad changes in organizations and organizational functions. However, the existing literature on how and what factors influence the changes in EA adoption remains limited. Our study aims to fill in this gap. We study how the EA-initiated changes occur and what are the factors influencing it. Our process-oriented perspective, our data from a qualitative case study, and the lens of organizational change illustrate how the changes occur in organizations, what the factors are, and how especially managers and their activities influence the change. We show that the change is both sociotechnical and punctuated, oscillating between different organizational levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dang, D. D., & Pekkola, S. (2017). Systematic literature review on enterprise architecture in the public sector. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 15, 130–154.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bloomberg, Jason. 2014. Is Enterprise Architecture Completely Broken? Forbes. July.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boh, W. F., & Yellin, D. (2006). Using enterprise architecture standards in managing information technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23, 163–207. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222230307

  4. Foorthuis, R., van Steenbergen, M., Brinkkemper, S., & Bruls, W. A. G. (2016). A theory building study of enterprise architecture practices and benefits. Information Systems Frontiers, 18, 541–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-014-9542-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Thai, D. M., Duong, D., Falch, M., Xuan, C. B., & Thu, T. T. A. (2021). Factors affecting the sustainability of telecentres in developing countries. Telecommunications Policy, 102265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102265

  6. Dang, D., Pekkola, S., Vartiainen, T., & Pham, S. (2022). Platformization practices of health information systems: A case of National eHealth platforms. In Proceedings of the 55th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, US.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Banaeianjahromi, N., & Smolander, K. (2019). Lack of communication and collaboration in enterprise architecture development. Information Systems Frontiers, 21, 877–908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9779-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dang, D. (2021). Institutional logics and their influence on enterprise architecture adoption. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 61, 42–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ross, J. W., Weill, P., & Robertson, D. (2006). Enterprise architecture as strategy: Creating a foundation for business execution. Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Simon, D., Fischbach, K., & Schoder, D. (2013). An exploration of enterprise architecture research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 32.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bruls, W., van Steenbergen, M., Foorthuis, R., Bos, R., & Brinkkemper, S. (2010). Domain architectures as an instrument to refine enterprise architecture. CAIS, 27.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schmidt, C., & Buxmann, P. (2011). Outcomes and success factors of enterprise IT architecture management: Empirical insight from the international financial services industry. European Journal of Information Systems, 20, 168–185.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lange, M., Mendling, J., & Recker, J. (2016). An empirical analysis of the factors and measures of Enterprise Architecture Management success. European Journal of Information Systems, 25, 411–431. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.39

  14. Kuipers, B. S., Higgs, M., Kickert, W., Tummers, L., Grandia, J., & Van Der Voet, J. (2014). The management of change in public organizations: A literature review. Public Administration, 92, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dang, D., & Pekkola, S. (2020). Institutional perspectives on the process of enterprise architecture adoption. Information Systems Frontiers, 22, 1433–1445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ruta, P., & Grabis, J. (2015). Integrated methodology for information system change control based on enterprise architecture models. Information Technology and Management Science, 18, 103–108.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dam, H. K., Lam-Son, L., & Ghose, A. (2016). Managing changes in the enterprise architecture modelling context. Enterprise Information Systems, 10, 666–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2014.986219.

  18. Brosius, M., & Aier, S. (2016). The impact of enterprise architecture management on design decisions in IS change projects. In V. Nissen, D. Stelzer, S. Straßburger, & D. Fischer (Eds.), Bd. (vol. 3, pp. 1405–1416). Ilmenau: Universitätsverlag Ilmenau.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nam, K., Oh, S. W., Kim, S. K., Goo, J., & Sajid Khan, M. (2016). Dynamics of enterprise architecture in the Korean public sector: Transformational change vs. transactional change. Sustainability, 8, 1074. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8111074

  20. Hoogervorst, J. (2004). Enterprise architecture: enabling integration, agility and change. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 13, 213–233. World Scientific Publishing Co. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021884300400095X

  21. Forman, C., King, J. L., & Lyytinen, K. (2014). Special section introduction—Information, technology, and the changing nature of work. Information Systems Research, 25, 789–795. INFORMS. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2014.0551

  22. Walsham, G. (2006). Doing interpretive research. European Journal of Information Systems, 15, 320–330. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dang, D., & Pekkola, S. (2017). Enterprise architecture and organizational reform: A project debrief. In PACIS 2017 Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lyytinen, K., & Newman, M. (2008). Explaining information systems change: a punctuated socio-technical change model. European Journal of Information Systems, 17, 589–613. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.50

  25. Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., & Hinings, C. R. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 58–80. Academy of Management. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069285

  26. Besson, P., & Rowe, F. (2012). Strategizing information systems-enabled organizational transformation: A transdisciplinary review and new directions. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 21, 103–124. 20th Anniversary Special Issue. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2012.05.001

  27. Hjort-Madsen, K. (2007). Institutional patterns of enterprise architecture adoption in government. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 1, 333–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dang, D., & Vartiainen, T. (2019). Digital strategy patterns in information systems research. In PACIS 2019 Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Dang, D., & Vartiainen, T. (2020). Changing patterns in the process of digital transformation initiative in established firms: The case of an energy sector company. In PACIS 2020 Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hylving, L., & Bygstad, B. (2019). Nuanced responses to enterprise architecture management: Loyalty, voice, and exit. Journal of Management Information Systems, 36, 14–36. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2018.1550549

  31. Dang, D., Vartiainen, T., & Pekkola, S. (2019). Patterns of enterprise architecture adoption in the public sector: A resource-based perspective. In Proceedings of the 27th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Stockholm & Uppsala, Sweden (17).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

A previous version of this paper was presented at the 21st Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (Langkawi, Malaysia) as completed research paper #71, “Enterprise Architecture and Organizational Reform: A Project Debrief”, PACIS 2017 Proceedings, https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2017/71. For more information about the conference, please see https://aisnet.org/page/Conferences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Duong Dang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dang, D., Pekkola, S. (2023). Organizational Change and Enterprise Architecture Adoption: A Case Study in the Public Sector. In: Hoang Thuan, N., Dang-Pham, D., Le, HS., Phan, T.Q. (eds) Information Systems Research in Vietnam. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3804-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics