Skip to main content

Hybrid Tree-Based Wetland Vulnerability Modelling

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Challenges of Disasters in Asia

Part of the book series: Springer Natural Hazards ((SPRINGERNAT))

  • 217 Accesses

Abstract

Wetlands of the moribund region of the Ganga–Brahmaputra deltaic part experience extreme loss and degradation, which is the leading cause for our present study. In this study, the vulnerable situation, as a part of degradation, is explored using tree-based ML algorithms in python environment using eight conditioning parameters, namely: water presence frequency (WPF), change in WPF, hydro duration, water depth, agriculture presence frequency, proximity to the river, distance from the road network, and built-up proximity. Four tree-based machine learning algorithms, namely, bagging classification model, reduced error pruning tree (REP Tree), gradient boosting classification model (GBM), and AdaBoosting classification model (ADB), has been used to evaluate the vulnerability of wetlands for both phase II (1998–2007) and phase III (2008–2017). It is found that 23.92–25.01% and 44.67–46.99% area to total wetland area emerged as high to very high vulnerable zone in phase II, whereas 24.08–26.16% and 45.41–49.13% of wetland area identified as high to very high vulnerable zone in phase III. More than 45% of the total wetland area disappeared during phase II to phase III. The models have been validated using the following matrices like sensitivity, Precision F1-score, and MCC for justifying the best-suited model. With an average score of more than 91 for all the matrices, the gradient boosting classification model (GBM), and AdaBoosting classification model (ADB) exhibit more prediction capability and model accuracy than the bagging classification model, and Reduced Error Pruning (REP) Tree model. With the successful prediction, the study recommends tree-based ML algorithms for such or similar works. The study also warns about growing wetland habitat vulnerability and its negative consequences on socio-ecological benefits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdi AM (2020) Land cover and land use classification performance of machine learning algorithms in a boreal landscape using Sentinel-2 data. Gisci Remote Sens 57(1):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2019.1650447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adnan RM, Khosravinia P, Karimi B, Kisi O (2021) Prediction of hydraulics performance in drain envelopes using Kmeans based multivariate adaptive regression spline. Appl Soft Comput 100:107008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akpabio EM, Umoh GS (2021) The practical challenges of achieving sustainable wetland agriculture in Nigeria’s Cross River basin. Water Int 46(1):83–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ankar SJ, Yadav A (2021) A high-speed protection strategy for bipolar CSC-based HVDC transmission system. Electric Power Comp Syst 49(1–2):48–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assessment ME (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: wetlands and water

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagchi K, Mukerjee KN (1983) Diagnostic survey of West Bengal(s). Dept. of Geography

    Google Scholar 

  • Bala G, Mukherjee A (2010) Inventory of wetlands of Nadia district, West Bengal, India and their characterization AS. J Environ Sociobiol 7(2):93–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Borro M, Morandeira N, Salvia M, Minotti P, Perna P, Kandus P (2014) Mapping shallow lakes in a large South American floodplain: a frequency approach on multitemporal Landsat TM/ETM data. J Hydrol 512:39–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bui DT, Pradhan B, Revhaug I, Tran CT (2014) A comparative assessment between the application of fuzzy unordered rules induction algorithm and J48 decision tree models in spatial prediction of shallow landslides at Lang Son City, Vietnam. In: Remote sensing applications in environmental research. Springer, Cham, pp 87–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaffron S, Delage E, Budinich M, Vintache D, Henry N, Nef C, Eveillard D (2021) Environmental vulnerability of the global ocean epipelagic plankton community interactome. Sci Adv 7(35):eabg1921

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen F, Yu B, Li B (2018a) A practical trial of landslide detection from single-temporal Landsat8 images using contour-based proposals and random forest: a case study of national Nepal. Landslides 15(3):453–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Li H, Hou E, Wang S, Wang G, Panahi M, Ahmad BB (2018b) GIS-based groundwater potential analysis using novel ensemble weights-of-evidence with logistic regression and functional tree models. Sci Total Environ 634:853–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Shahabi H, Zhang S, Khosravi K, Shirzadi A, Chapi K, Ahmad BB (2018c) Landslide susceptibility modeling based on gis and novel bagging-based kernel logistic regression. Appl Sci 8(12):2540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chhabra M, Shukla MK, Ravulakollu KK (2021) Bagging-and boosting-based latent fingerprint image classification and segmentation. In: International conference on innovative computing and communications. Springer, Singapore, pp 189–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Codagnone C, Bogliacino F, Gómez C, Charris R, Montealegre F, Liva G, Veltri GA (2020) Assessing concerns for the economic consequence of the COVID-19 response and mental health problems associated with economic vulnerability and negative economic shock in Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom. PLoS ONE 15(10):e0240876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costache R, Arabameri A, Moayedi H, Pham QB, Santosh M, Nguyen H, Pham BT (2021) Flash-flood potential index estimation using fuzzy logic combined with deep learning neural network, naïve Bayes, XGBoost and classification and regression tree. Geocarto Int 1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Das RT, Pal S (2016) Identification of water bodies from multispectral landsat imageries of Barind Tract of West Bengal. Int J Innov Res Rev 4(1):26–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Daviran M, Maghsoudi A, Ghezelbash R, Pradhan B (2021) A new strategy for spatial predictive mapping of mineral prospectivity: automated hyperparameter tuning of random forest approach. Comput Geosci 148:104688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debanshi S, Pal S (2020) Wetland delineation simulation and prediction in deltaic landscape. Ecol Ind 108:105757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defne Z, Aretxabaleta AL, Ganju NK, Kalra TS, Jones DK, Smith KE (2020) A geospatially resolved wetland vulnerability index: synthesis of physical drivers. PLoS ONE 15(1):e0228504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong X, Kattel G, Jeppesen E (2020) Subfossil cladocerans as quantitative indicators of past ecological conditions in Yangtze River Basin lakes, China. Sci Total Environ 728:138794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Magd SAA, Eldosouky AM (2021) An improved approach for predicting the groundwater potentiality in the low desert lands; El-Marashda area, Northwest Qena City, Egypt. J Afr Earth Sci 179:104200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everard M, Kangabam R, Tiwari MK, McInnes R, Kumar R, Talukdar GH, Das L (2019) Ecosystem service assessment of selected wetlands of Kolkata and the Indian Gangetic Delta: multi-beneficial systems under differentiated management stress. Wetlands Ecol Manage 27(2):405–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fickas KC, Cohen WB, Yang Z (2016) Landsat-based monitoring of annual wetland change in the Willamette Valley of Oregon, USA from 1972 to 2012. Wetlands Ecol Manage 24(1):73–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson M, Davidson N (2018) Global wetland outlook: Technical note on status and trends. Secretariat of the Ramsar Convention

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson C (2006) Vulnerability assessment of important habitats for migratory species: examples from eastern Asia and northern Australia. In: Migratory species and climate change: impacts of a changing environment on Wild animals. UNEP/Earthprint, pp 18–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh B (2021) Spatial mapping of groundwater potential using data-driven evidential belief function, knowledge-based analytic hierarchy process and an ensemble approach. Environ Earth Sci 80(18):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Baggethun E, Tudor M, Doroftei M, Covaliov S, Năstase A, Onără DF, Cioacă E (2019) Changes in ecosystem services from wetland loss and restoration: an ecosystem assessment of the Danube Delta (1960–2010). Ecosyst Serv 39:100965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger JE, Mahdianpari M, Puestow T, Warren S, Mohammadimanesh F, Salehi B, Brisco B (2021) Object-based random forest wetland mapping in Conne River, Newfoundland, Canada. J Appl Remote Sens 15(3):038506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffis-Kyle KL, Mougey K, Vanlandeghem M, Swain S, Drake JC (2018) Comparison of climate vulnerability among desert herpetofauna. Biol Cons 225:164–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grzybowski M, Glińska-Lewczuk K (2019) Principal threats to the conservation of freshwater habitats in the continental biogeographical region of Central Europe. Biodivers Conserv 28(14):4065–4097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo B, Cheng Z, Feng T (2020) Research on the influence of dual governance on the vulnerability of technology innovation network in major engineering projects. Int J Electr Eng Educ 0020720920940606

    Google Scholar 

  • Han J, Park S, Kim S, Son S, Lee S, Kim J (2019) Performance of logistic regression and support vector machines for seismic vulnerability assessment and mapping: a case study of the 12 September 2016 ML5. 8 Gyeongju Earthquake, South Korea. Sustainability 11(24):7038

    Google Scholar 

  • Henke J (2020) Regressing background characteristics on the self-assessed and the objective measure of economic vulnerability. In: Revisiting economic vulnerability in old age. Springer, Cham, pp 217–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst FC (1916) Report on the Nadia rivers, Calcutta, pp 1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam ARMT, Talukdar S, Mahato S, Ziaul S, Eibek KU, Akhter S, Linh NTT (2021) Machine learning algorithm-based risk assessment of riparian wetlands in Padma River Basin of Northwest Bangladesh. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacinth Jennifer J, Saravanan S (2021) Artificial neural network and sensitivity analysis in the landslide susceptibility mapping of Idukki district, India. Geocarto Int 1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain R, Xu W (2021) HDSI: High dimensional selection with interactions algorithm on feature selection and testing. PLoS ONE 16(2):e0246159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James G, Witten D, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2013) An introduction to statistical learning, vol 112. Springer, New York, p. 18

    Google Scholar 

  • Jun MJ (2021) A comparison of a gradient boosting decision tree, random forests, and artificial neural networks to model urban land use changes: the case of the Seoul metropolitan area. Int J Geograph Inform Sci 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Khatun R, Talukdar S, Pal S, Saha TK, Mahato S, Debanshi S, Mandal I (2021) Integrating remote sensing with swarm intelligence and artificial intelligence for modelling wetland habitat vulnerability in pursuance of damming. Ecol Inform 101349

    Google Scholar 

  • Kundu S, Pal S, Talukdar S, Mandal I (2021) Impact of wetland fragmentation due to damming on the linkages between water richness and ecosystem services. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Liu B, Yu Y, Li H, Sun J, Cui J (2021) 3E-LDA: three enhancements to linear discriminant analysis. ACM Trans Knowl Discov Data (TKDD) 15(4):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Nahayo L, Habiyaremye G, Christophe M (2020) Applicability and performance of statistical index, certain factor and frequency ratio models in mapping landslides susceptibility in Rwanda. Geocarto Int 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin ML, Tsai CW, Chen CK (2021) Daily maximum temperature forecasting in changing climate using a hybrid of multi-dimensional complementary ensemble empirical mode decomposition and radial basis function neural network. J Hydrol Reg Stud 38:100923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ling C, Wei X, Shen Y, Zhang H (2021) Development and validation of multiple machine learning algorithms for the classification of G-protein-coupled receptors using molecular evolution model-based feature extraction strategy. Amino Acids 53(11):1705–1714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo X, Wang F, Bhandari S, Wang N, Qiu X (2021a) Effectiveness evaluation and influencing factor analysis of pavement seal coat treatments using random forests. Constr Build Mater 282:122688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo X, Wen X, Zhou M, Abusorrah A, Huang L (2021b) Decision-tree-initialized dendritic neuron model for fast and accurate data classification. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst

    Google Scholar 

  • Majumdar D (1978) District Gazetteer, Nadia, Govt, of West Bengal, p. 7

    Google Scholar 

  • McFeeters SK (1996) The use of the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features. Int J Remote Sens 17(7):1425–1432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng L, Dong J (2019) LUCC and ecosystem service value assessment for wetlands: a case study in Nansi Lake, China. Water 11(8):1597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohana RM, Reddy CKK, Anisha PR, Murthy BR (2021) Random forest algorithms for the classification of tree-based ensemble. Mater Today Proc

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosaffaie J, Jam AS, Tabatabaei MR, Kousari MR (2021) Trend assessment of the watershed health based on DPSIR framework. Land Use Policy 100:104911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers MR, Cayan DR, Iacobellis SF, Melack JM, Beighley RE, Barnard PL, Page HM (2019) Santa Barbara area coastal ecosystem vulnerability assessment. California Sea Grant

    Google Scholar 

  • Neto JG, Ozorio LV, de Abreu TCC, dos Santos BF, Pradelle F (2021) Modeling of biogas production from food, fruits and vegetables wastes using artificial neural network (ANN). Fuel 285:119081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie F, Wang Z, Wang R, Wang Z, Li X (2020) Adaptive local linear discriminant analysis. ACM Trans Knowl Discov Data (TKDD) 14(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal S, Debanshi S (2021a) Developing wetland landscape insecurity and hydrological security models and measuring their spatial linkages. Eco Inform 66:101461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal S, Debanshi S (2021b) Machine learning models for wetland habitat vulnerability in mature Ganges delta. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(15):19121–19146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal S, Paul S (2020) Assessing wetland habitat vulnerability in moribund Ganges delta using bivariate models and machine learning algorithms. Ecol Indicators 119:106866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106866

  • Pal S, Paul S (2021a) Stability consistency and trend mapping of seasonally inundated wetlands in Moribund deltaic part of India. Environ Dev Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01193-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal S, Paul S (2021b) Linking hydrological security and landscape insecurity in the moribund deltaic wetland of India using tree-based hybrid ensemble method in python. Ecol Inform 65:101422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101422

  • Pal S, Saha TK (2018) Identifying dam-induced wetland changes using an inundation frequency approach: the case of the Atreyee River basin of Indo-Bangladesh. Ecohydrol Hydrobiol 18(1):66–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal S, Talukdar S (2018) Application of frequency ratio and logistic regression models for assessing physical wetland vulnerability in Punarbhaba river basin of Indo-Bangladesh. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J 24(5):1291–1311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal S, Talukdar S (2019) Impact of missing flow on active inundation areas and transformation of parafluvial wetlands in Punarbhaba-Tangon river basin of Indo-Bangladesh. Geocarto Int 34(10):1055–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal S, Talukdar S, Ghosh R (2020) Damming effect on habitat quality of riparian corridor. Ecol Ind 114:106300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal S, Sarda R (2021) Modeling riparian flood plain wetland water richness in pursuance of damming and linking it with a methane emission rate. Geocarto Int 1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Pal S (2011) Wetland of Bengal basin: virtue and vulnerability, lower gangetic plain of India. Lap Lambert Academic Publishing, Saarbrücken, pp 63–87. ISBN 978-3-8473-2636-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul S, Pal S (2020a) Exploring wetland transformations in moribund deltaic parts of India. Geocarto Int 35(16):1873–1894. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2019.1581270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul S, Pal S (2020b) Predicting wetland area and water depth of Ganges moribund deltaic parts of India. Remote Sens Appl Soc Environ 19:100338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2020.100338

  • Pham BT, Prakash I, Singh SK, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H, Bui DT (2019) Landslide susceptibility modeling using reduced error pruning trees and different ensemble techniques: hybrid machine learning approaches. CATENA 175:203–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasher K (2018) The state of India’s disappearing 919 wetlands. The Weather Channel India. https://weather.com/en-IN/india/news/news/2018-11-08-the-case-of-indias-disappearingwetlands

  • Qolipour F, Ghasemzadeh M, Mohammad-Karimi N (2021) The predictability of tree-based machine learning algorithms in the big data context. Int J Eng 34(1):82–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabbani M, Wang Y, Khoshkangini R, Jelodar H, Zhao R, Ahmadi SBB, Ayobi S (2021) A review on machine learning approaches for network malicious behavior detection in emerging technologies. Entropy 23(5):529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha TK, Pal S (2019a) Emerging conflict between agriculture extension and physical existence of wetland in post-dam period in Atreyee River basin of Indo-Bangladesh. Environ Dev Sustain 21(3):1485–1505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha TK, Pal S (2019b) Exploring physical wetland vulnerability of Atreyee river basin in India and Bangladesh using logistic regression and fuzzy logic approaches. Ecol Ind 98:251–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson SL (2021) Response of wetlands to impacts from agricultural land-use practices: implications for conservation, management, and rehabilitation in the Nuwejaars Catchment, Western Cape

    Google Scholar 

  • Sattari MT, Feizi H, Colak MS, Ozturk A, Ozturk F, Apaydin H (2021) Surface water quality classification using data mining approaches: irrigation along the Aladag River. Irrigation and Drainage

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarpiniti M, Colasante F, Di Tanna S, Ciancia M, Lee YC, Uncini A (2021) Deep belief network based audio classification for construction sites monitoring. Expert Syst Appl 177:114839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahabi H, Shirzadi A, Ronoud S, Asadi S, Pham BT, Mansouripour F, Bui DT (2021) Flash flood susceptibility mapping using a novel deep learning model based on deep belief network, back propagation and genetic algorithm. Geosci Front 12(3):101100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaziayani WN, Ul-Saufie AZ, Ahmat H, Al-Jumeily D (2021) Coupling of quantile regression into boosted regression trees (BRT) technique in forecasting emission model of PM10 concentration. Air Qual Atmosp Health 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Song H, Liu A, Li G, Liu X (2021) Bayesian bootstrap aggregation for tourism demand forecasting. Int J Tourism Res

    Google Scholar 

  • Talukdar S, Pal S (2019) Effects of damming on the hydrological regime of Punarbhaba river basin wetlands. Ecol Eng 135:61–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talukdar S, Eibek KU, Akhter S, Ziaul S, Islam ARMT, Mallick J (2021) Modeling fragmentation probability of land-use and land-cover using the bagging, random forest and random subspace in the Teesta River Basin, Bangladesh. Ecol Indicators 126:107612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taser PY (2021) Application of bagging and boosting approaches using decision tree-based algorithms in diabetes risk prediction. In: Multidisciplinary digital publishing institute proceedings, vol 74, No. 1, p. 6

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevisan DP, da Conceição Bispo P, Almeida D, Imani M, Balzter H, Moschini LE (2020) Environmental vulnerability index: an evaluation of the water and the vegetation quality in a Brazilian Savanna and Seasonal Forest biome. Ecol Ind 112:106163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker KW (2021) Exploring adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) as a platform for the predictive modeling of tangible collection usage. J Acad Librariansh 47(6):102450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen L, Hughes M (2020) Coastal wetland mapping using ensemble learning algorithms: a comparative study of bagging, boosting and stacking techniques. Remote Sensing 12(10):1683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia H, Ge S, Zhang X, Kim G, Lei Y, Liu Y (2021) Spatiotemporal dynamics of green infrastructure in an agricultural peri-urban area: a case study of Baisha District in Zhengzhou. China Land 10(8):801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao H, Shahab A, Li J, Xi B, Sun X, He H, Yu G (2019) Distribution, ecological risk assessment and source identification of heavy metals in surface sediments of Huixian karst wetland, China. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 185:109700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Chung H, Kim JS (2021) Local or neighborhood? Examining the relationship between traffic accidents and land use using a gradient boosting machine learning method: the case of suzhou industrial park, china. J Adv Transp

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang T, He W, Zheng H, Cui Y, Song H, Fu S (2021) Satellite-based ground PM2. 5 estimation using a gradient boosting decision tree. Chemosphere 268:128801

    Google Scholar 

  • Zharmagambetov A, Carreira-Perpinán MA (2021) A simple, effective way to improve neural net classification: ensembling unit activations with a sparse oblique decision tree. In: 2021 IEEE international conference on image processing (ICIP). IEEE, pp 369–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Zharmagambetov A, Hada SS, Gabidolla M, Carreira-Perpinán MA (2021) Non-greedy algorithms for decision tree optimization: an experimental comparison. In: 2021 international joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN). IEEE, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satyajit Paul .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pal, S., Paul, S. (2022). Hybrid Tree-Based Wetland Vulnerability Modelling. In: Sajjad, H., Siddiqui, L., Rahman, A., Tahir, M., Siddiqui, M.A. (eds) Challenges of Disasters in Asia. Springer Natural Hazards. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3567-1_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics