Skip to main content

Experimental and Theoretical Analysis of CaCl2 Liquid Desiccant System with Solar Regeneration

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Advances in Energy Technologies

Abstract

The building consumes a momentous amount of universal total energy, predominantly heating, ventilation, and air conditioning system that consumes 50% of the said energy of the building. Energy usage consumption of dehumidification varies from 20 to 40% of the total heating, ventilation, and air conditioning system. Desiccant cooling can be regarded as an environmentally friendly air conditioning technology. CaCl2 liquid desiccant is more cost-effective and adaptable in its use of low-grade energy sources, as well as beneficial in delivering elevated quality supply air with unbiased humidity and temperature control. Theoretical and experimental analysis are done to assess the desiccant cooling system’s performance and regeneration with the solar thermal collector. A flat thermal collector is tested for heating of desiccant solution, with a collector efficiency of 22% for the hot fluid temperature of 70 ℃. An analytical method is used to determine the performance of vertical film type dehumidifier, for different parameters such as the solution’s concentration; the temperature of desiccant enters into the dehumidifier flow of air and desiccant. Dehumidification performance increases as concentration increases, mass removal rate increases by 21.8% but the mass removal rate decreases by 12.7% as the temperature of the desiccant solution increases. The dehumidification cooling rate is a maximum of 1.02 kW for the concentration of 45% at 18 ℃, thus dehumidification performance is shown better results at higher concentrations and low temperatures. Air and desiccant flow have an influence on mass removal rate up to a certain limit, as increasing airflow, more than 450 m3/hr, and desiccant flow rate of 0.512 kg/s has no effect as contact time between air and desiccant decreases. Regeneration performance increases as solution temperature increases, mass evaporation increases by 50%. Since solar energy is used, the total energy of the system reduces and emissions-related also reduce.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Nanda Kishore PVR, Dilip D (2013) Experimental analysis of a liquid desiccant dehumidifier using aqueous calcium chloride solution. Int J Inno Res Sci Eng Technol 2(2013):2319–8753

    Google Scholar 

  2. Seenivasan D, Selladurai V, Arjunan TV (2018) Experimental studies on the performance of dehumidifier using calcium chloride as a liquid desiccant. Int J Energy Technol Policy 14(2018):49–63

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chen X, Riffat S, Hongyu B, Zheng X, Reay D (2020) Recent progress in liquid desiccant dehumidification and air-conditioning: a review. Energy Built Environ 1(2020):106–130

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cho H-J, Cheon S-Y, Jeong J-W (2019) Experimental analysis of dehumidification performance of counter and cross-flow liquid desiccant dehumidifiers. Appl Therm Eng 150(2019):210–223

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rafique MM, Gandhidasan P, Bahaidarah HMS (2016) Liquid desiccant materials and dehumidifiers—a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 56(2016):179–195

    Google Scholar 

  6. Martin V, Goswami DY (2011) Effectiveness of heat and mass transfer processes in a packed bed liquid desiccant dehumidifier/regenerator. HAVC & R Res 6(1):21–39

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cho H-J, Jeong J-W (2018) Comparison of dehumidification performance of counter and cross-flow type liquid desiccant dehumidifiers. In: International refrigeration and air conditioning conference, pp. 2325, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Emhofer J, Beladi B, Dudzinski P, Fleckl T, Kuhlmann HC (2017) Analysis of a cross-flow liquid-desiccant falling-film. Appl Therm Eng 124:91–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Coca-Ortegon A, Prieto J, Coronas A (2016) Modelling and dynamic simulation of a hybrid liquid desiccant system regenerated with solar energy. Appl Therm Eng 97:109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang L, Dang C, Hihara E (2010) Performance analysis of a no-frost hybrid air conditioning system with integrated liquid desiccant dehumidification. Int J Refrigeration 33(2010):116–124

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang Q et al (2020) Performance optimization of a heat pump driven liquid desiccant dehumidification system using exergy analysis. Energy 204(2020):117891

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mansuriya K et al (2020) Assessment of liquid desiccant dehumidification aided vapor-compression refrigeration system based on thermo-economic approach. Appl Therm Eng 164(2020):114542

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yinglin L, Xiaosong Z, Laizai T, Zhongbin Z, Wei W, Xueying X (2016) Performance analysis of a novel liquid desiccant-vapor compression hybrid air-conditioning system. Energy 109(2016):180–189

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sanaye S, Taheri M (2018) Modeling and multi-objective optimization of a modified hybrid liquid desiccant heat pump (LD-HP) system for hot and humid regions. Appl Therm Eng 129(2018):212–229

    Google Scholar 

  15. Liu X, Xie Y, Zhang T, Chen L, Cong L (2018) Experimental investigation of a counter-flow heat pump driven liquid desiccant dehumidification system. Energy Build 179:223–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang Z, Lian Z, Tao R, Ni H, Zhong K (2019) Experimental study on the performance of the internally-heated ultrasonic atomization liquid desiccant regeneration system. Appl Therm Eng 163(2019):114211

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shen S, Cai W, Wang X, Wu Q, Yon H (2017) Investigation of liquid desiccant regenerator with heat recovery heat pipe system. Energy Build 146(2017):353–363

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chen Y, Luo Y, Yang H (2017) Energy saving potential of hybrid liquid desiccant and evaporative cooling air-conditioning system in Hong Kong. Energy Procedia 105:2125–2130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ren H, Ma Z, Liu J, Gong X, Li W (2019) A review of heat and mass transfer improvement techniques for dehumidifiers and regenerators of liquid desiccant cooling systems. Appl Therm Eng 162(2019):114271

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lin J, Huang S, Wang R, Chua KJ (2019) On the dimensional analysis of a cross-flow flow-plate membrane liquid desiccant dehumidifier. Energy Procedia 158(2019):1467–1472

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vivekh P, Islam MR, Chua KJ (2020) Experimental performance evaluation of a composite superabsorbent polymer coated heat exchanger based air dehumidification system. Appl Energy 260(2020):114256

    Google Scholar 

  22. Emhofer J et al (2017) Analysis of a cross-flow liquid-desiccant falling-film. Appl Therm Eng 124:91–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Thirumavalavan K, Sarukasan D (2022) Experimental investigation on multi-layered filament wound basalt/E-glass hybrid fiber composite tubes. Mater Res Express 9(4):045301

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wang C et al (2021) Study on heat transfer and dehumidification performance of desiccant coated microchannel heat exchanger. Appl Therm Eng 192(2021):116913

    Google Scholar 

  25. Guan B, Liu X, Zhang T (2021) Investigation of a compact hybrid liquid-desiccant air-conditioning system for return air dehumidification. Build Environ 187:107420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bhowmik M, Muthukumar P, Anandalakshmi R (2021) Experimental study of coupled heat and mass transfer phenomena between air and desiccant in a solar-assisted thermal liquid desiccant system. Int J Therm Sci 162(2021):106795

    Google Scholar 

  27. Peng D et al (2020) Applicability, optimization, and performance comparison of self-preheated solar collector/regenerator. Solar Energy 198(2020):113–123

    Google Scholar 

  28. Unterberger V et al (2021) An adaptive short-term forecasting method for the energy yield of flat-plate solar collector systems. Appl Energy 293(2021):116891

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tao W et al (2021) Comparative study on the liquid desiccant dehumidification performance of lithium chloride and potassium formate. Renew Energy 167(2021):841–852

    Google Scholar 

  30. Abeens M et al (2021) An investigation on the effect of stacking fault energies on surface mechanical treatment process of AA6061 alloy and ETP-copper. Surf Topogr Metrol Prop 9(3):035010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Guan B, Liu X, Zhang T (2021) Exergy analysis on optimal desiccant solution flow rate in heat exchanger for air dehumidification using a liquid desiccant. Int J Refrig 128:129–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhou X (2021) Thermal and energy performance of a solar-driven desiccant cooling system using an internally cooled desiccant wheel in various climate conditions. Appl Therm Eng 185:116077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Peng D, Xu S, Yang H (2020) Heat and mass transfer characteristics and dehumidification performance improvement of an evaporatively-cooled liquid dehumidifier. Appl Therm Eng 178(2020):115579

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sarukasan D, Thirumavalavan K, Prahadeeswaran M, Muruganandhan R (2021) Fabrication and mechanical characterization of jute-coir reinforced unsaturated polyester resin hybrid composites with various fiber size using compression moulding technique. Int J Recent Technol Eng 10(1). https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.a5934.0510121

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Sarukasan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sarukasan, D., Sudharson, S., Thirumavalavan, K., Prahadeeswaran, M., Austin, S.A. (2023). Experimental and Theoretical Analysis of CaCl2 Liquid Desiccant System with Solar Regeneration. In: Narasimhan, N.L., Bourouis, M., Raghavan, V. (eds) Recent Advances in Energy Technologies. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3467-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3467-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-3466-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-3467-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics