Skip to main content

Developing a Detailed Process to Quantify Risks on Variations of Project Time

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
ICSCEA 2021

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 268))

  • 516 Accesses

Abstract

The quantification of project time variations is important to project execution. However, so far, there has been still a lack of studies that focus on specific project schedules. Using structured and semi-structured interviews with contractors, this study develops a process in the planning phase of risk responses, which could help to assess the level of project time variations based on the impact of event chains. The application of the process is also illustrated using a case study, which is a part of the pre-validated actual project. The developed process could help to evaluate the precise impact of risk events with simple handling. The findings of this study could provide practitioners (e.g., project management teams) with a guideline to quantify the impact of risks on the dynamic levels of project time based on the analysis of the sensitivity chart of risk events. Hence, they could not only avoid the phenomena of excessive optimism and pessimism, but also allocate resources more appropriately during project implementation processes to reduce the unexpected impacts of risks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Choi HH, Mahadevan S (2008) Construction project risk assessment using existing database and project-specific information. J Constr Eng Manag 134(11):894–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Del Cano A, de la Cruz MP (2002) Integrated methodology for project risk management. J Constr Eng Manag 128(6):473–485

    Google Scholar 

  3. Diab MF, Varma A, Panthi K (2017) Modeling the construction risk ratings to estimate the contingency in highway projects. J Constr Eng Manag 143(8):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. El-Sayegh SM (2008) Risk assessment and allocation in the UAE construction industry. Int J Proj Manag 26(4):431–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Erol H, Dikmen I, Atasoy G, Birgonul MT (2020) Exploring the relationship between complexity and risk in megaconstruction projects. J Constr Eng Manag 146(12):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gonzalez P, González V, Molenaar K, Orozco F (2014) Analysis of causes of delay and time performance in construction projects. J Constr Eng Manag 140(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hanna AS, Thomas G, Swanson JR (2013) Construction risk identification and allocation: Cooperative approach. J Constr Eng Manag 139(9):1098–1107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jannadi OA, Almishari S (2003) Risk assessment in construction. J Constr Eng Manag 129(5):492–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim HJ, Reinschmidt KF (2011) Effects of contractors’ risk attitude on competition in construction. J Constr Eng Manag 137(4):275–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nasir D, McCabe B, Hartono L (2003) Evaluating risk in construction-schedule model (ERIC–S): construction schedule risk model. J Constr Eng Manag 129(5):518–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Qazi A, Quigley J, Dickson A, Kirytopoulos K (2016) Project complexity and risk management (ProCRiM): Towards modelling project complexity driven risk paths in construction projects. Int J Proj Manag 34(7):1183–1198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sachs T, Tiong RL (2009) Quantifying qualitative information on risks: Development of the QQIR method. J Constr Eng Manag 135(1):56–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schatteman D, Herroelen W, Van de Vonder S, Boone A (2008) Methodology for integrated risk management and proactive scheduling of construction projects. J Constr Eng Manag 134(11):885–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Siraj NB, Fayek AR (2019) Risk identification and common risks in construction: Literature review and content analysis. J Constr Eng Manag 145(9):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Subramanyan H, Sawant PH, Bhatt V (2012) Construction project risk assessment: development of model based on investigation of opinion of construction project experts from India. J Constr Eng Manag 138(3):409–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Taroun A (2014) Towards a better modelling and assessment of construction risk: Insights from a literature review. Int J Proj Manag 32(1):101–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zayed T, Amer M, Pan J (2008) Assessing risk and uncertainty inherent in Chinese highway projects using AHP. Int J Proj Manag 26(4):408–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zeng J, An M, Smith NJ (2007) Application of a fuzzy based decision-making methodology to construction project risk assessment. Int J Proj Manag 25(6):589–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zeynalian M, Trigunarsyah B, Ronagh HR (2013) Modification of advanced programmatic risk analysis and management model for the whole project life cycle’s risks. J Constr Eng Manag 139(1):51–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors fully acknowledge the support of time and resources from the affiliated organizations for this study. This research is funded by Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City (VNU-HCM) under grant number B2021-20-08. We would like to thank Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (HCMUT), VNU-HCM for the support of time and facilities for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chau Ngoc Dang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Le, DA., Le-Hoai, L., Dang, C.N. (2023). Developing a Detailed Process to Quantify Risks on Variations of Project Time. In: Reddy, J.N., Wang, C.M., Luong, V.H., Le, A.T. (eds) ICSCEA 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 268. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3303-5_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3303-5_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-3302-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-3303-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics