Skip to main content

Long-Term and Early Effects of Computer-Assisted Instruction in Early Childhood

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Smart Education and e-Learning - Smart Pedagogy (SEEL-22 2022)

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 305))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 609 Accesses

Abstract

Longitudinal studies are an infrequently used but essential means to identify effective literacy interventions for young readers. This study aimed to identify whether computer-adaptive technology, specifically Waterford Early Learning (WEL), in the early grades leads to lasting impacts on literacy skills. In this study, the literacy skills of second grade students in a public school district in Maryland were measured at the end of the 2017–2018 school year using a district administered literacy assessment. Scores were analyzed in three distinct comparisons: overall effects, comparing students who used computer-assisted instruction (CAI) to those who did not; long-term effects, comparing students who were assessed one year after using CAI to those with no CAI usage; and early effects, comparing students who used CAI for three years compared to two years. Students who used CAI in kindergarten, first grade, and second grade significantly outperformed students who did not use the program in any year on two measures of reading skills. Moreover, students who used the program in kindergarten and first grade but did not use in second grade significantly outperformed their control counterparts who did not use the program when assessed one year after, indicating the long-term effects of the program on students’ literacy skills. Students who used the program for all three years outperformed students who did not start using the program until first grade, indicating that beginning educational technology programs as early as possible makes a lasting impact on students’ literacy skills. Overall, technology may be a beneficial addition to the traditional classroom setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lonigan, C.J., Shanahan, T.: Executive summary developing early literacy: Report of the national early literacy panel: A scientific synthesis of early literacy development and implications for intervention (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bakken, L., Brown, N., Downing, B.: Early childhood education: the long-term benefits. J. Res. Child. Educ. 31(2), 255–269 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Quirk, M., Schwanenflugel, P.J., Webb, M.Y.: A short-term longitudinal study of the relationship between motivation to read and reading fluency skill in second grade. J. Lit. Res. 41(2), 196–227 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Al Otaiba, S., Kim, Y.S., Wanzek, J., Petscher, Y., Wagner, R.K.: Long-term effects of first-grade multitier intervention. J. Res. Educ. Effect. 7(3), 250–267 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Northrop, L.: Breaking the cycle: cumulative disadvantage in literacy. Read. Res. Q. 52(4), 391–396 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brownell, M.D., et al.: Long-term benefits of full-day kindergarten: a longitudinal population-based study. Early Child Dev. Care 185(2), 291–316 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Boser, U.: Why educational research needs more development. Center for American Progress (2019). https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/education-k-12/news/2019/07/29/472816/education-research-needs-development. Accessed 21 July 2019

  8. Aud, S., et al.: The condition of education. NCES 2012-045. National Center for Education Statistics (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Delgado, A.J., Wardlow, L., McKnight, K., O’Malley, K.: Educational technology: a review of the integration, resources, and effectiveness of technology in K-12 classrooms. J. Inf. Technol. Educ. 14, 397–416 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. McEwan, P.J.: Improving learning in primary schools of developing countries: a meta-analysis of randomized experiments. Rev. Educ. Res. 85(3), 353–394 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Connor, C.M., Morrison, F.J., Fishman, B., Crowe, E.C., Al Otaiba, S., Schatschneider, C.: A longitudinal cluster-randomized controlled study on the accumulating effects of individualized literacy instruction on students’ reading from first through third grade. Psychol. Sci. 24(8), 1408–1419 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Suhr, K. A., Hernandez, D. A., Grimes, D., Warschauer, M.: Laptops and fourth grade literacy: Assisting the jump over the fourth-grade slump. J. Technol. Learn. Assess. 9(5) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bebell, D., Pedulla, J.: A quantitative investigation into the impacts of 1:1 iPads on early learner’s ELA and math achievement. J. Inform. Technol. Educ.: Innov. Pract. 14(1), 191–215 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Foster, M.E., Anthony, J.L., Clements, D.H., Sarama, J., Williams, J.M.: Improving mathematics learning of kindergarten students through computer-assisted instruction. J. Res. Math. Educ. 47(3), 206–232 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schechter, R., Macaruso, P., Kazakoff, E.R., Brooke, E.: Exploration of a blended learning approach to reading instruction for low SES students in early elementary grades. Comput. Sch. 32(3–4), 183–200 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Henrie, C.R., Halverson, L.R., Graham, C.R.: Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: a review. Comput. Educ. 90, 36–53 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chapman, J.W., Tunmer, W.E., Prochnow, J.E.: Early reading-related skills and performance, reading self-concept, and the development of academic self-concept: a longitudinal study. J. Educ. Psychol. 92(4), 703–708 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Robinson, K.: The effect of technology integration on high school students’ literacy achievement. Teach. English Technol. 16(3), 3–16 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Suggate, S.P.: A meta-analysis of the long-term effects of phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, and reading comprehension interventions. J. Learn. Disabil. 49(1), 77–96 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rimm-Kaufman, S.E., et al.: Efficacy of the responsive classroom approach: results from a 3-year, longitudinal randomized controlled trial. Am. Educ. Res. J. 51(3), 567–603 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. van Dijk, W., Lane, H., Gage, N.A: The relation between implementation fidelity and students’ reading outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. Dissertation, Florida State University (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Abbott, R.D., Berninger, V.W., Fayol, M.: Longitudinal relationships of levels of language in writing and between writing and reading in grades 1 to 7. J. Educ. Psychol. 102(2), 281–298 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haya Shamir .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Shamir, H., Yoder, E., Pocklington, D., Feehan, K., Ortiz-Wood, C. (2022). Long-Term and Early Effects of Computer-Assisted Instruction in Early Childhood. In: Uskov, V.L., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds) Smart Education and e-Learning - Smart Pedagogy. SEEL-22 2022. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 305. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3112-3_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics