Skip to main content

Multiple Values of Ecosystem Services and Human Well-Being

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sundarbans and its Ecosystem Services

Abstract

This chapter attempts to explore multiple values of ecosystem services and their contribution towards human well-being. It scrutinises the well-being of both humans and nature in terms of interdependence on one another. It categorises the Ecosystem Services (ES), their significance and examines the way ES contributes to human well-being. It also delves into the nuances of building a transformative pathway for human–nature relationships. Additionally, this chapter depicts the current state of the Ecosystem Services (ES) from the TRU’s perspective along with the drivers of change in the forest. It examines the factors negatively and positively affecting the ecosystem’s balance, and thus well-being of the forest and its people. The chapter demonstrates that both human and nature are dependent on each other and form a human–nature sociality in the ecosystem through which they coexist, therefore promoting human–nature sociality is the key to ensure virtuous cycle in the ecosystem and harmonious relations between human and nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alkire, S. (2002). Dimensions of human development. World Development, 30(2), 181–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banzhaf, S., & Boyd, J. (2007). What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecological Economics, 63(2–3), 616–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, J. (1997). Which species? What kind of diversity? Which ecosystem function? Some problems in studies of relations between biodiversity and ecosystem function. Applied Soil Ecology, 10, 191–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., D’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farberk, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P., & van den Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily, G. (1997). Nature’s services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily, G. C., Alexander, S., Ehrlich, P. R., Goulder, L., Lubchenco, J., Matson, P. A., Mooney, H. A., Postel, S., Schneider, S. H., Tilman, D., & Woodwell, G. M. (1997). Ecosystem service: Benefits supplied to human societies by natural ecosystems. Issues in Ecology, 1(2), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Groot, R. S., Wilson, M. A., & Boumans, R. M. J. (2002). A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 41, 393–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz, S., Fargione, J., Chapin, F. S. III, & Tilman, D. (2006). Biodiversity loss threatens human well-being. PLoS Biol, 4(8), e277. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040277

  • Díaz, S., Demissew, S., Carabias, J., Joly, C., Lonsdale, M., Ash, N., et al. (2015). The IPBES conceptual framework—Connecting nature and people. Elsevier, 14, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Jiménez, D., Berghöfer, U., Berghöfer, A., Heubach, K., Kosmus, M., & Bertrab-Tamm, A. V. (2018). Beyond measurements: Multiple values of nature and their diverse conceptualization. Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), Bonn, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, D. M., Wainger, L. A., Bartoldus, C. C., & Wakeley, J. S. (2000). Expanding wetland assessment procedures: Linking indices of wetland function with services and values. Wetland Research Program, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konoshima, T., Konishi, T., Takasaki, M., Yamazoe, K., & Tokuda, H. (2001). Anti-tumor-promoting activity of the Diterpene from Excoecaria agallocha. Biological &/and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 24(12), 1440–1442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layke, C., Mapendembe, A., Brown, C., Walpole, M., & Winn, J. (2012). Indicators from the global and sub-global millennium ecosystem assessments: An analysis and next steps. Ecological Indicators, 17, 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005a). Ecosystems and human well-being: Current state and trends. Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005b). Ecosystems and human well-being: A framework for assessment. Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay, A., Payo, A., Chanda, A., Ghosh, T., Chowdhury, S. M., & Hazra, S. (2018). Dynamics of the Sundarbans mangroves in Bangladesh under climate change. In R. Nicholls, C. Hutton, W. Adger, S. Hanson, M. Rahman, & M. Salehin (Eds.), Ecosystem services for well-being in deltas. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nandy, G. J. (2001). Relation between rate of photosynthesis and leaf temperature during summer at specific PAR values. ~, air temp. Plant Biol, 44(s4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Titumir, R. A. M., Afrin, T., & Islam, M. S. (2020). Traditional knowledge, institutions and human sociality in sustainable use and conservation of biodiversity of the Sundarbans of Bangladesh. In O. Saito, S. M. Subramanian, H. Hashimoto, & K. Takeuchi (Eds.), Managing socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes for sustainable communities in Asia: Mapping and navigating stakeholders, policy and action (pp. 67–92). Science for Sustainable Societies. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1133-2_5

  • Titumir, R. A. M., & Paran, M. S. (2022a). Human-nature cooperation for well-being: Community understanding on one health approach in the COVID-19 era in the Sundarbans. In M. Nishi, S. M. Subramanian, H. Gupta (Eds.), Biodiversity-health-sustainability nexus in socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes (SEPLS). Springer Nature, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titumir, R. A. M., & Paran, M. S. (2022b). Ecosystem services and well-being in the Sundarbans of Bangladesh: A multiple evidence base trajectory. In R. Dasgupta, S. Hashimoto, & O. Saito (Eds.), Assessing, mapping and modelling of mangrove ecosystem services. Springer Sustainability Science Book Series (Forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Titumir, R. A. M., & Paran, M. S. (2022c). Human-nature relationship for post 2020 biodiversity framework: An exploration into traditional knowledge, customary sustainable use and community-based innovation in the Sundarbans. In R. A. M. Titumir (Ed.), Fifty years of nation building: Political economy of Bangladesh’s development. Centennial Book Series Project of University of Dhaka. Department of Development Studies, University of Dhaka (Forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Titumir, R. A. M., Paran, M. S., & Pasha, M. W. (2019). The Sundarbans is our mind: An exploration into multiple values of nature in conversation with traditional resource users. In UNU-IAS & IGES (Eds.), Understanding the multiple values associated with sustainable use in socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes (SEPLS) (Vol. 5, pp. 97–117). Satoyama Initiative Thematic Review. United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unnayan Onneshan. (2020). Biodiversity, climate change and traditional resource users in the Sundarbans: An exploration through public participation geographic information system (PPGIS) (Unpublished Research Report). Unnayan Onneshan, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Oudenhoven, A. P. E., Petz, K., Alkemade, R., Hein, L., & de Groot, R. S. (2012). Framework for systematic indicator selection to assess effects of land management on ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators, 21, 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.01.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vo, T., Kuenzer, C., Minh, V., Moder, F., & Oppelt, N. (2012). Review of valuation methods for mangrove ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators, 23, 431–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, K. J. (2007). Classification of ecosystem services: Problems and solutions. Biological Conservation, 139(3–4), 235–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Many insights of the chapter are drawn from ‘Ecosystem services and well-being in the Sundarbans of Bangladesh: A multiple evidence base trajectory’, to be published by Springer Nature, Singapore in Assessing, mapping and modelling of mangrove ecosystem services, eds. R. Dasgupta, S. Hashimoto & O. Saito, Springer Sustainability Science Book Series.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rashed Al Mahmud Titumir .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Titumir, R.A.M., Paran, M.S., Pasha, M.W. (2022). Multiple Values of Ecosystem Services and Human Well-Being. In: Titumir, R.A.M. (eds) Sundarbans and its Ecosystem Services. Sustainable Development Goals Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3000-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics