Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sugar Beet Production Under Changing Climate: Opportunities and Challenges

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sugar Beet Cultivation, Management and Processing

  • 1037 Accesses

Abstract

Sugar has formed an essential part of human diets for a long time and is an important raw material for the food, beverage and pharmaceutical industries. It is a common name for sucrose and can be extracted from two field crops—sugar beet and sugar cane. Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris ssp. vulgaris) is mainly grown in countries with temperate climates while sugar cane (Saccharum officinarum L.) is cultivated primarily in tropical and subtropical countries. It was demonstrated that sugar beet yield has kept increasing since 1926, but sugar concentration (on fresh weight basis) has not changed much. In the meantime, the improved potential sugar beet yields in the varieties included in the variety trials have been rapidly translated into commercially delivered yields by sugar beet farmers. This can be seen in the increase of farmer-delivered sugar beet yields in parallel with the increase of sugar beet yields in the variety trials. The warming temperature and increasing concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere due to climate change have benefitted the sugar beet crop in recent decades and will probably create opportunities to further boost sugar crop productivity in the future. However, social and environmental demands to adapt sugar beet production to both less input-intensive and less pesticide-dependent cropping systems to mitigate climate change and to maintain biodiversity friendly environments require sugar beet farmers to balance the trade-offs between maximising the sugar yield and increasing the use efficiencies of inputs such as fertilisers, fungicides, pesticides, herbicides and fuels. Sugar beet breeders and other stakeholders need to breed climate-smart cultivars resistant to diseases and find other effective non-chemical solutions to the reduced availability and/or removal of reliable pesticides in the face of more new pathogens emerging under climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ABF:

Associated British Foods plc

AY:

Attainable yields

BChV:

Beet chlorosis virus

BMYV:

Beet mild yellowing virus

BYV:

Beet yellows virus

CV%:

Coefficient of variation

FY:

Farmers’ yields

GCM:

Global climate model

GHG:

Greenhouse gas

PY:

Potential yield

PYwl:

Water-limited potential sugar beet yields

RCPs:

Representative concentration pathways

References

  • Bastin JF, Clark E, Elliott T, Hart S, van den Hoogen J, Hordijki I et al (2019) Understanding climate change from a global analysis of city analogues. PLoS One 14(7):e0217592. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217592

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bosemark NO (2006) Chapter 4- Genetics and breeding. In: Draycott P (ed) Sugar Beet. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 50–88

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chaloner TM, Gurr SJ, Bebber DP (2021) Plant pathogen infection risk tracks global crop yields under climate change. Nat Clim Chang 11:710–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiurugwi T, Holmes HF, Qi A, Chia TYP, Hedden P, Mutasa-Gottgens ES (2013) Development of new quantitative physiological and molecular breeding parameters based on the sugar-beet vernalization intensity model. J Agric Sci 151:492–505

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deihimfard R, Rahimi-Moghaddamb S, Goudrian J, Damghani AM, Noori O, Nazari S (2021) Can optimizing the transplant of sugar beet by age and date enhance water productivity in arid and semi-arid climates? Field Crop Res 271:108266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewar AM, Qi A (2021) The virus yellows epidemic in sugar beet in the UK in 2020 and the adverse effect of the EU ban on neonicotinoids on sugar beet production. Outlooks Pest Manag 32:53–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Draycott AP (2006) Sugar beet. Blackwell, Oxford, pp. xxi+474

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ewert F, Rounsevell MDA, Reginster I, Metzger MJ, Leemans R (2005) Future scenarios of European agricultural land use: I. Estimating changes in crop productivity. Agric Ecosyst Environ 107:101–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory PJ, Marshall B (2012) Attribution of climate change: a methodology to estimate the potential contribution to increases in potato yield in Scotland since 1960. Glob Chang Biol 18:1372–1388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield JL, Boote KJ, Kimball BA, Ziska LH, Izaurralde RC, Ort D, Thomson AM, Wolfe D (2011) Climate impacts on agriculture: implications for crop production. Agron J 103:351–370. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2010.0303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann CM (2019) Importance of canopy closure and dry matter partitioning for yield formation of sugar beet varieties. Field Crop Res 236:75–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann CM, Kenter C (2018) Yield potential of sugar beet – have we hit the ceiling? Front Plant Sci 9:289. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00289

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann CM, Kluge-Severin S (2010) Light absorption and radiation us efficiency of autumn and spring sown sugar beets. Field Crop Res 119:238–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2010.07.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann CM, Kluge-Severin S (2011) Growth analysis of autumn and spring sown sugar beet. Eur J Agron 34:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2010.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann CM, Huijbregts T, van Swaaij N, Jansen R (2009) Impact of different environments in Europe on yield and quality of sugar beet genotypes. Eur J Agron 30:17–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann CM, Koch H-J, Märländer B (2020) Sugar beet. In: Sadras VO, Calderini D (eds) Crop physiology. Case histories for major crops. Elsevier Inc, San Diego, pp 635–674

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossain R, Menzel W, Lachmann C, Varrelmann M (2021) New insights into virus yellows distribution in Europe and effects of beet yellows virus, beet mild yellowing virus, and beet chlorosis virus on sugar beet yield following field inoculation. Plant Pathol 70:584–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPPC Secretariat (2021) Scientific review of the impact of climate change on plant pests – a global challenge to prevent and mitigate plant pest risks in agriculture, forestry and ecosystems. FAO on behalf of the IPPC Secretariat, Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb4769en

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jaggard KW, Qi A (2006) Chapter 7-Agronomy. In: Draycott P (ed) Sugar Beet. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 134–168

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jaggard KW, Werker AR (1999) An evaluation of the potential benefits and cost of autumn-sown sugar beet in NW Europe. J Agric Sci 132:91–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaggard KW, Dewar AM, Pidgeon JD (1998) The relative effects of drought stress and virus yellows on the yield of sugar beet in the UK, 1980-95. J Agric Sci 130:337–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaggard KW, Qi A, Semenov MA (2007) The impact of climate change on sugarbeet yield in the UK: 1976-2004. J Agric Sci 145:367–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaggard KW, Qi A, Ober ES (2009) Capture and use of solar radiation, water and nitrogen by sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). J Exp Bot 60:1919–1925

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jaggard KW, Qi A, Ober ES (2010) Possible changes to arable crop yields by 2050. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 365:2835–2851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaggard KW, Qi A, Milford GFJ, Clark CJA, Ober ES, Walters C, Burks E (2011) Determining the optimal population density of sugar beet crops in England. Int Sugar J 113:12–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaggard KW, Koch H-J, Arroyo Sanz JM, Cattanach A, Duval R, Eigner H, Legrand G, Olsson R, Qi A, Thomsen JN, Van Swaaij N, Minerva N (2012) The yield gap in some sugar beet producing countries. Int Sugar J 114:496–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis J, Qi A (2014) Developing and using the AB sugar BeetGro model. Br Sugar Beet Rev 82:45–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeger M, Beresford R, Bock C, Brown N, Fox A, Newton A, Vicent A, Xu X, Yuen J (2021) Global challenges facing plant pathology: multidisciplinary approaches to meet the food security and environmental challenges in the mid-twenty-first century. CABI Agric Biosci 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43170-021-00042-x

  • Jones PD, Lister DH, Jaggard KW, Pidgeon JD (2003) Future climate change impact on the productivity of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) in Europe. Climate Change 58:93–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juroszek P, Racca P, Link S, Farhumand J, Kleinhenz B (2020) Overview on the review articles published during the past 30 years relating to the potential climate change effects on plant pathogens and crop disease risks. Plant Pathol 69:179–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremer P, SchlĂĽter J, Racca P, Fuchs HJ, Lang C (2016) Possible impact of climate change on the occurrence and the epidemic development of Cercospora leaf spot disease (Cercospora beticola sacc.) in sugar beets for Rhineland-Palatinate and the southern part of Hesse. Climate Change 137:481–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1697-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobell DB, Gourdji SM (2012) The influence of climate change on global crop productivity. Plant Physiol 160:1686–1697

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Loel J, Kenter C, Märländer B, Hoffmann CM (2014) Assessment of breeding progress in sugar beet by testing old and new varieties under greenhouse and field conditions. Eur J Agron 52:146–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manderscheid R, Pacholski A, Weigel H-J (2010) Effect of free air carbon dioxide enrichment combined with two nitrogen levels on growth, yield and yield quality of sugar beet: evidence for a sink limitation of beet growth under elevated CO2. Eur J Agron 32:228–239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McKersie B (2015) Planning for food security in a changing climate. J Exp Bot 66:3435–3450. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru547

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milford GFJ (2006) Chapter 3- Plant structure and crop physiology. In: Draycott P (ed) Sugar Beet. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 30–49

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson R (2020) International plant pathology- past and future contributions to global food security. Phytopathology 110:245–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Newbery F, Qi A, Fitt BDL (2016) Modelling impacts of climate change on arable crop diseases; progress, challenges and applications. Curr Opin Plant Biol 32:101–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • NOAA (2021) NOAA National Center for Environmental information, Climate at a Glance: Global Time Series, published July 2021. https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag. Accessed 14 Jul 2021

  • Oerke E-C (2006) Crop losses to pests. J Agric Sci 144:31–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okom S, Russell A, Chaudhary AJ, Scrimshawa MD, Francis RA (2017) Impacts of projected precipitation changes on sugar beet yield in eastern England. Meteorol Appl 24:52–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pidgeon JD, Werker AR, Jaggard KW, Richter GM, Lister DH, Jones PD (2001) Climatic impact on the productivity of sugar beet in Europe, 1961–1995. Agric For Meteorol 109:27–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pin PA, Benlloch R, Bonnet D, Wremerth-Weich E, Kraft T, Gielen J, Nilsson O (2010) An antagonistic pair of FT homologs mediates the control of flowering time in sugar beet. Science 330:1397–1400

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Qi A, Fitt BDL (2014) Can crop disease control cope with climate change? Outlooks Pest Manag 25:364–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi A, Jaggard KW (2008) Assessing the impact of future climate changes on the UK sugar beet production. In: Aspects of applied biology 88: effects of climate changes on plants: implications for agriculture. Association of Applied Biologists (AAB), Wellesbourne, Warwick, pp 153–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi A, Jaggard KW (2012) Sugar beet yield in England under an extreme climate change scenario. In: In Proceedings of the 73rd IIRB Congress, Brussels, pp. 73–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi A, May M (2013) How the sugar beet crop grew in 2012. Br Sugar Beet Rev 81:3–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi A, Dewar AM, Harrington R (2004) Decision making in controlling virus yellows of sugar beet in the UK. Pest Manag Sci 60:727–732

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Qi A, Kenter C, Hoffmann C, Jaggard KW (2005) The Broom’s barn sugar beet growth model and its adaptation to soils with varied available water content. Eur J Agron 23:108–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi A, Pettitt I, May M (2010) Assessing the cost-effectiveness of inputs. Br Sugar Beet Rev 78(4):17–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi A, Eric ES, Jaggard KW (2012) Benchmarking sugar beet yields and the growers’ performance. Br Sugar Beet Rev 80:3–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi A, Eric ES, Jaggard KW (2013) Updating the BBRO/Broom’s barn sugar beet growth model. Br Sugar Beet Rev 81:29–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi A, Holland RA, Taylor G, Richter GM (2018) Grassland futures in Great Britain – productivity assessment and scenarios for land use change opportunities. Sci Total Environ 634:1108–1118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Racca P, Kakau J, Kleinhenz B, Kuhn C (2015) Impact of climate change on the phenological development of winter wheat, sugar beet and winter oilseed rape in Lower Saxony, Germany. J Plant Dis Prot 122:16–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redman G (2021) John Nix pocketbook for farm management 2022, 52nd edn. Melton Mowbray: Agro Business Consultants, Leicestershire, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter GM, Jaggard KW, Mitchell RAC (2001) Modelling radiation interception and radiation use efficiency for sugar beet under variable climatic stress. Agric For Meteorol 109:13–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter G, Qi A, Semenov M, Jaggard KW (2006) Variability of UK sugar beet yields under climate change and soil use adaptation needs. Soil Use Manag 22:39–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig C, Iglesias A, Yang XB, Epstein PR, Chivian E (2001) Climate change and extreme weather events. Implications for food production, plant disease, and pests. Global Change Hum Health 2:90–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders DGO (2021) Will yield gains be lost to disease? Nat Clim Chang 11:648–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savary S, Willocquet L, Pethybridge SJ, Esker P, McRoberts N, Nelson A (2019) The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops. Nat Ecol Evol 3:430–439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scott RK, Jaggard KW (2000) Impact of weather, agronomy and breeding on yields of sugarbeet in the UK since 1970. J Agric Sci 134:341–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semenov MA, Stratonovitch P (2010) Use of multi-model ensembles from global climate models for assessment of climate change impacts. Clim Res 41:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semenov MA, Stratonovitch P (2015) Adapting wheat ideotypes for climate change: accounting for uncertainties in CMIP5 climate projections. Clim Res 65:123–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva JV, Tenreiro TR, Spätjens L, Anten NPR, van Ittersum MK, Reidsma P (2020) Can big data explain yield variability and water productivity in intensive cropping systems? Field Crop Res 255:107828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan H, Böttcher U, Sieling K, Kage H (2020) Yield potential of non-bolting winter sugar beet in Germany. Eur J Agron 115:126035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens M, Liu HY, Lemaire O (2006) Chapter 11- Virus diseases. In: Draycott P (ed) Sugar Beet. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 256–278

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sugar Industry (2021) Emergency authorisations to use neonicotinoids moved westwards. Sugar Ind 146(4)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel J, Kenter C, Holst C, Märländer B (2018) New generation of resistant sugar beet varieties for advanced integrated Management of Cercospora Leaf Spot in Central Europe. Front Plant Sci 9:222. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00222

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Werker AR, Jaggard KW (1997) Modelling asymmetrical growth curves that rise and then fall: applications to foliage dynamics of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Ann Bot 79:657–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werker AR, Jaggard KW (1998) Dependence of sugar beet yield on light interception and evapotranspiration. Agric For Meteorol 89:229–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werker AR, Jaggard KW, Allison MF (1998) Modelling partitioning between structure and storage in sugar beet: effects of drought and soil nitrogen. Plant Soil 207:97–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu X, Han B, Song B, Yang J (2020) Effect of extending seedling-raising period on yield of transplanting sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) in black soil area of Northeast China. Sugar Tech 22(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-020-00862-7

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks are due to Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, UK, for granting access to the meteorological data from the Broom’s Barn weather station, Suffolk, UK, to Dr. Mikhail A. Semenov at Rothamsted Research for help of future climate change scenario information and generating the climate change scenarios using his LARS-Weather Generator, to British Sugar of Associated British Foods plc for the virus yellows survey and sugar yield data each year, to Dr. Alan Dewar at Dewar Crop Protection Ltd. for sharing information on the rise and fall of neonicotinoids pesticide use on sugar beet, to Mr. Patrick Jarvis for sharing ideas developing sugar beet management tools, and Mr. Tyler Grove, general agronomist and Ms. Kathy Wang, senior agriculture information analyst in American Crystal Sugar Company, Fargo, USA, for providing the sugar yield and sugar concentration data. Last, but not least, I thank Professor Keith Jaggard at Jaggard Consultancy, Sugar Beet Agronomy Research, Prof. Dr. Christa Hoffmann, Department of Physiology, Institute of Sugar Beet Research, Göttingen, Germany, for giving critical comments and improving this Chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Agriculture, Food and Environmental Management Research, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK

    Aiming Qi

Authors
  1. Aiming Qi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aiming Qi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. ICAR-Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow, India

    Varucha Misra

  2. ICAR-Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow, India

    Santeshwari Srivastava

  3. ICAR-Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow, India

    Ashutosh Kumar Mall

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Qi, A. (2022). Sugar Beet Production Under Changing Climate: Opportunities and Challenges. In: Misra, V., Srivastava, S., Mall, A.K. (eds) Sugar Beet Cultivation, Management and Processing. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2730-0_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation