Abstract
The advent of Blockchain started when a mysterious person or organization with an alias Satoshi Nakamoto published a white paper named “Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System.” This paper introduced a digital currency with no middlemen and no central authority. This meant, no transaction taxes, secure transactions, and a uniform currency. Hence, started the expedition of Blockchain Technology. Blockchain Technology needs consensus algorithms to insert a valid block of data to the Blockchain and maintain its state. Due to the rapid developments in Blockchain Technology and it’s adaptation to a plethora of wide areas (games, digital art, medical records, etc.), a study of consensus algorithms is essential to help researchers and developers to adapt a consensus algorithm according to their needs (proof of resource or majority voting).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
S. Masseport, B. Darties, R. Giroudeau, J. Lartigau, Proof of experience: empowering proof of work protocol with miner previous work, in 2020 2nd Conference on Blockchain Research & Applications for Innovative Networks and Services (BRAINS) (IEEE, 2020), pp. 57–58
K. Zheng, S. Zhang, X. Ma, Difficulty prediction for proof-of-work based blockchains, in 2020 IEEE 21st international Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC) (IEEE, 2020), pp. 1–5
R. Nakahara, H. Inaba, Proposal of fair proof-of-work system based on rating of user’s computing power, in 2018 IEEE 7th Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE) (IEEE, 2018), pp. 746–748
N. Gavrilovic, V. Ciric, Design and evaluation of proof of work based anti-spam solution, in 2020 Zooming Innovation in Consumer Technologies Conference (ZINC) (IEEE, 2020), pp. 286–289
S.S. Hazari, Q.H. Mahmoud, A parallel proof of work to improve transaction speed and scalability in blockchain systems, in 2019 IEEE 9th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC) (IEEE, 2019), pp. 0916–0921
P.R. Yogesh, Backtracking tool root-tracker to identify true source of cyber crime. Proc. Comput. Sci. 171, 1120–1128 (2020)
Z. Feng, Q. Luo, Evaluating memory-hard proof-of-work algorithms on three processors. Proc. VLDB Endow. 13(6), 898–991 (2020)
H. Alsabah, A. Capponi, Pitfalls of bitcoin’s proof-of-work: R&D arms race and mining centralization. Available at SSRN 3273982 (2020)
E.U.A. Seyitoglu, A.A. Yavuz, T. Hoang, Proof-of-useful-randomness: mitigating the energy waste in blockchain proof-of-work (2021)
S.R. Niya et al., Adaptation of proof-of-stake-based blockchains for IoT data streams, in 2019 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency (ICBC) (IEEE, 2019)
G. Pattewar, N. Mahamuni, H. Nikam, O. Loka, R. Patil, Management of IoT devices security using blockchain—a review, in Sentimental Analysis and Deep Learning, pp. 735–743 (2022)
N. Nair, A.K. Dalal, A. Chhabra, N. Giri, Edu-coin: a proof of stake implementation of a decentralized skill validation application, in 2019 International Conference on Nascent Technologies in Engineering (ICNTE) (IEEE, 2019), pp. 1–4
D. Tosh et al., CloudPoS: a proof-of-stake consensus design for blockchain integrated cloud, in 2018 IEEE 11th International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD) (IEEE, 2018)
S. Leonardos, D. Reijsbergen, G. Piliouras, Weighted voting on the blockchain: improving consensus in proof of stake protocols. Int. J. Network Manage. 30(5), e2093 (2020)
P. Gaži, A. Kiayias, A. Russell, Stake-bleeding attacks on proof-of-stake blockchains, in 2018 Crypto Valley Conference on Blockchain Technology (CVCBT) (IEEE, 2018)
S. Deore, R. Bachche, A. Bichave, R. Patil, Review on applications of blockchain for electronic health records systems, in International Conference on Image Processing and Capsule Networks (Springer, Cham, 2021), pp. 609–616
A. Pal, K. Kant, DC-PoET: proof-of-elapsed-time consensus with distributed coordination for blockchain networks, in 2021 IFIP Networking Conference (IFIP Networking) (IEEE, 2021), pp. 1–9
L. Chen, L. Xu, N. Shah, Z. Gao, Y. Lu, W. Shi, On security analysis of proof-of-elapsed-time (PoET), in International Symposium on Stabilization, Safety, and Security of Distributed Systems (Springer, Cham, 2018), pp. 282–297
R.Y. Patil, M.A. Ranjanikar, A new network forensic investigation process model, in Mobile Computing and Sustainable Informatics (Springer, Singapore, 2022), pp. 139–146
F. Zhang, I. Eyal, R. Escriva, A. Juels, R. Van Renesse, {REM}: resource-efficient mining for blockchains, in 26th {USENIX} Security Symposium ({USENIX} Security 17), pp. 1427–1444 (2017)
A. Corso, Performance analysis of proof-of-elapsed-time (PoET) consensus in the sawtooth blockchain framework, Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, 2019
B. Ampel, M. Patton, H. Chen, Performance modeling of hyperledger sawtooth blockchain, in 2019 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI) (IEEE, 2019), pp. 59–61
V. Costan, S. Devadas, Intel SGX explained. IACR Cryptol. ePrint Arch. 2016(86), 1–118 (2016)
C. Saraf, S. Sabadra, Blockchain platforms: a compendium, in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Innovative Research and Development (ICIRD) (IEEE, 2018), pp. 1–6
G.T. Nguyen, K. Kim, A survey about consensus algorithms used in blockchain. J. Inf. Process. Syst. 14(1), 101–128 (2018)
X. Zheng, W. Feng, Research on practical byzantine fault tolerant consensus algorithm based on blockchain. J. Phys: Conf. Ser. 1802, 032022 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1802/3/032022
W. Li, C. Feng, L. Zhang, H. Xu, B. Cao, M.A. Imran, A scalable multi-layer PBFT consensus for blockchain. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 32(5), 1146–1160 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPDS.2020.3042392
K. Lei, Q. Zhang, L. Xu, Z. Qi, Reputation-based byzantine fault-tolerance for consortium blockchain 604–611 (2018)
J. Seo, D. Ko, S. Kim, S. Park, A coordination technique for improving scalability of byzantine fault-tolerant consensus. Appl. Sci. 10(21), 7609 (2020)
Y.-A. Min, The modification of pBFT algorithm to increase network operations efficiency in private blockchains. Appl. Sci. 11, 6313 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/app111463131
G. Golan Gueta et al., SBFT: a scalable and decentralized trust infrastructure, in 2019 49th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN), pp. 568–580 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/DSN.2019.00063
H. Samy, A. Tammam, A. Fahmy, B. Hasan, Enhancing the performance of the blockchain consensus algorithm using multithreading technology. Ain Shams Eng. J. (2021)
D. Mingxiao, M. Xiaofeng, Z. Zhe, W. Xiangwei, C. Qijun, A review on consensus algorithm of blockchain, in 2017 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), pp. 2567–2572 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC.2017.8123011
M. Krstić, L. Krstić, Hyperledger frameworks with a special focus on hyperledger fabric. Vojnotehnicki glasnik 68, 639–663 (2020). https://doi.org/10.5937/vojtehg68-26206
R.Y. Patil, S.R. Devane, Network forensic investigation protocol to identify true origin of cyber crime. J. King Saud Univ. Comput. Inf. Sci. (2019)
D. Sivaganesan, Performance estimation of sustainable smart farming with blockchain technology. IRO J. Sustain. Wirel. Syst. 3(2), 97–106 (2021)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Borse, M., Shendkar, P., Undre, Y., Mahadik, A., Patil, R.Y. (2022). A Review of Blockchain Consensus Algorithm. In: Jacob, I.J., Kolandapalayam Shanmugam, S., Bestak, R. (eds) Expert Clouds and Applications. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 444. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2500-9_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2500-9_31
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-2499-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-2500-9
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)