Skip to main content

Robot-Assisted Thoracic Surgery in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Techniques in Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery

Abstract

Lobectomy is the standard treatment for early non-small cell lung cancer. Various surgical techniques for lobectomy have been developed, and minimally invasive thoracic surgery, such as video-assisted thoracic surgery or robot-assisted thoracic surgery, has been considered as an alternative to conventional open thoracotomy. Recently, Robotic lobectomy is becoming increasingly popular since the first case series was published in 2002. Several studies have reported that robotic lobectomy has comparable oncologic and perioperative outcomes to those of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy and open lobectomy. However, robotic lobectomy remains a challenge for surgeons because of the steep learning curve, reduced tactile sensation, difficulty in port placement, and challenges in cooperation between the surgeon and assistant. Many studies have reported on robotic lobectomy, but few have presented surgical techniques for robotic lobectomy. In this article, the surgical techniques and optimal performance of robotic lobectomy are described in detail for all five types of lobectomy for surgeons beginning with robotic lobectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Yang CF, Sun Z, Speicher PJ, et al. Use and outcomes of minimally invasive lobectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer in the National Cancer Data Base. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101:1037–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Emmert A, Straube C, Buentzel J, Roever C. Robotic versus thoracoscopic lung resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96:e7633.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. O’Sullivan KE, Kreaden US, Hebert AE, Eaton D, Redmond KC. A systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus open and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery approaches for lobectomy. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019;28:526–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Linsky P, Wei B. Robotic lobectomy. J Visc Surg. 2017;3:132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kneuertz PJ, D’Souza DM, Richardson M, Abdel-Rasoul M, Moffatt-Bruce SD, Merritt RE. Long-term oncologic outcomes after robotic lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer versus video-assisted thoracoscopic and open thoracotomy approach. Clin Lung Cancer. 2020;21:214–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Roviaro G, Rebuffat C, Varoli F, Vergani C, Mariani C, Maciocco M. Videoendoscopic pulmonary lobectomy for cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1992;2:244–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Berfield KS, Farjah F, Mulligan MS. Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;107:603–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McKenna RJ Jr. Lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery with mediastinal node sampling for lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;107:879–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Landreneau RJ, Mack MJ, Hazelrigg SR, et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery: basic technical concepts and intercostal approach strategies. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992;54:800–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin J. Robotic lobectomy: revolution or evolution? J Thorac Dis. 2017;9:2876–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Park BJ, Flores RM, Rusch VW. Robotic assistance for video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy: technique and initial results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131:54–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ricciardi S, Cardillo G, Zirafa CC, Davini F, Melfi F. Robotic lobectomies: when and why? J Visc Surg. 2017;3:112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Melfi FM, Menconi GF, Mariani AM, Angeletti CA. Early experience with robotic technology for thoracoscopic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;21:864–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zirafa CC, Romano G, Key TH, Davini F, Melfi F. The evolution of robotic thoracic surgery. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;8:210–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Galetta D, Casiraghi M, Pardolesi A, Borri A, Spaggiari L. New stapling devices in robotic surgery. J Visc Surg. 2017;3:45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Farivar AS, Cerfolio RJ, Vallieres E, et al. Comparing robotic lung resection with thoracotomy and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery cases entered into the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Innovations (Phila). 2014;9:10–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kent M, Wang T, Whyte R, Curran T, Flores R, Gangadharan S. Open, video-assisted thoracic surgery, and robotic lobectomy: review of a national database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97:236–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Veronesi G, Galetta D, Maisonneuve P, et al. Four-arm robotic lobectomy for the treatment of early-stage lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;140:19–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Adams RD, Bolton WD, Stephenson JE, Henry G, Robbins ET, Sommers E. Initial multicenter community robotic lobectomy experience: comparisons to a national database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97:1893–900.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bao F, Zhang C, Yang Y, He Z, Wang L, Hu J. Comparison of robotic and video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer: a propensity-matched analysis. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8:1798–803.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang HX. Long-term survival of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients who underwent robotic procedure: a propensity score-matched study. Chin J Cancer. 2016;35:66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Qiu T, Zhao Y, Xuan Y, Jiao W. Robotic-assisted double-sleeve lobectomy. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9:E21–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Wilson JL, Louie BE, Cerfolio RJ, et al. The prevalence of nodal upstaging during robotic lung resection in early stage non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97:1901–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Casiraghi M, Spaggiari L. Robotic lobectomy has the greatest benefit in patients with marginal pulmonary function. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11(Suppl 3):S322–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Veronesi G, Novellis P, Difrancesco O, Dylewski M. Robotic assisted lobectomy for locally advanced lung cancer. J Visc Surg. 2017;3:78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wei B, Cerfolio RJ. Robotic lobectomy and segmentectomy: technical details and results. Surg Clin N Am. 2017;97:771–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Melfi FM, Mussi A. Robotically assisted lobectomy: learning curve and complications. Thorac Surg Clin. 2008;18:289–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gharagozloo F, Margolis M, Tempesta B, Strother E, Najam F. Robot-assisted lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer: report of 100 consecutive cases. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:380–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Arnold BN, Thomas DC, Bhatnagar V, et al. Defining the learning curve in robot-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. Surgery. 2019;165:450–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Song G, Sun X, Miao S, et al. Learning curve for robot-assisted lobectomy of lung cancer. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11:2431–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Jang HJ, Lee HS, Park SY, Zo JI. Comparison of the early robot-assisted lobectomy experience to video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for lung cancer: a single-institution case series matching study. Innovations (Phila). 2011;6:305–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pearlstein DP. Robotic lobectomy utilizing the robotic stapler. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102:e591–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pardolesi A, Bertolaccini L, Brandolini J, Solli P, Novellis P, Veronesi G. Four arms robotic-assisted pulmonary resection-left upper lobectomy: how to do it. J Visc Surg. 2018;4:109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Skylizard L, Minnich DJ. Initial consecutive experience of completely portal robotic pulmonary resection with 4 arms. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;142:740–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyun Koo Kim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lee, J.H., Han, K.N., Kim, H.K. (2022). Robot-Assisted Thoracic Surgery in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. In: Kim, K., Haam, S., Kim, H.K. (eds) Techniques in Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2472-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2472-9_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-2471-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-2472-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics