Skip to main content

Seismic Induced Pounding of Structures and Its Mitigation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Theory and Practice in Earthquake Engineering and Technology

Part of the book series: Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering ((SPRTRCIENG))

Abstract

Limited availability of land resources and increasing population have led to closely spaced buildings in cities, in which the stipulated separation distance is most often not available between the buildings. When subjected to an external excitation, such as from wind or earthquake, the differences in the dynamic characteristics of these adjacent buildings cause phase differences in their responses, leading to chances of structural collision or pounding. Pounding between closely spaced buildings under earthquake excitation has been identified as a serious hazard, due to falling of building material, as well as a major cause of structural damage, that may range from minor, affecting non-structural components only, to heavy. There have been reports of significant pounding damage during several past earthquakes in not only buildings but between decks and abutments and at expansion joints of bridges as well. There is, thus, a necessity of mitigating the effects of pounding at the design stage, or in existing structures, through construction details or by the installation of vibration control devices. In this chapter, first, the various situations in which structural pounding can arise under seismic excitation are presented, followed by the types of pounding, such as one-sided pounding and two-sided pounding. A summary of the pounding damage that has been reported in past earthquakes is provided. The different pounding models developed by researchers are examined, and the effects of varying dynamic properties and separation distance on pounding are studied. Codal specifications on the minimum separation distance are highlighted and a discussion is made on the various mitigation strategies for seismic pounding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Khatiawada et al (2011) Development of pounding model for adjacent structures in earthquakes. In: Proceedings of the ninth pacific conference on earthquake engineering building an earthquake–resilient society, Auckland, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kumar P, Kumar C (2015) Seismic pounding of the adjacent buildings with different heights. IJERST 2015

    Google Scholar 

  3. Asian Disaster Management News, vol 10, no 1, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pantelides CP, Ma X (1998) Linear and non-linear pounding of structural systems. Comput Struct 66:79–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Karamadi AB, Tograsi R (2017) Analysis of seismic pounding between adjacent buildings. IRJET 2017

    Google Scholar 

  6. Anagnostopoulos SA (1987) Pounding of building in series during earth-quakes. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 16:443–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Huba et al (2012) Study on partial collapse of a five story reinforced concrete building during the 2010 Chile earthquake. 15 WCEE LISBOA 2012

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pantelides CP, Ma X (1998) Linear and nonlinear pounding of structural systems. Comput Struct 66:79–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. National Academy of Sciences, the Great Alaska Earthquake of 1964. Engineering, NAS Publication 1606, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bertero VV, Collins RG (1973) Investigation of the failures of the Olive View stair towers during the San Fernando earthquake and their implications on seismic design

    Google Scholar 

  11. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Managua, Nicaragua Earthquake of December 23, 1972. Report EP-12, Oakland, CA, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tezcan SS, Yerlici V, Durgunoglu HT (1978) A reconnaissance report for the Romanian earthquake of 4 March 1977

    Google Scholar 

  13. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Thessaloniki, Greece earthquake of June 20, 1978. Reconnaissance Report, Report EP-32, Oakland, CA, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  14. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, The Central Greece earthquakes of February-March 1981. Reconnaissance and Engineering Report, Report JP- 05, Oak-land, CA, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jankowski R (2009) Non-linear FEM analysis of earthquake-induced pounding between the main building and the stairway tower of the Olive View Hospital. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bertero VV (1987) Observations on structural pounding. In: Proceedings of international conference on Mexico earthquakes

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kasai K, Maison BF (1997) Building pounding damage during the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. Eng Struct 19(3):195–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kawashima K, Shoji G (2000) Effect of restrainers to mitigate pounding between adjacent decks subjected to a strong ground motion. In: Proceedings on 12th world conference on earthquake engineering

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jankowski R, Mahmoud S (2015) Earthquake-induced structural pounding

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chung LL, Jean WY, Yeh YK, Hwang SJ, Tsai KC (2007) Seismic upgrading of compulsory school buildings in Taiwan. In: Proceedings on 2nd international conference on urban disaster reduction

    Google Scholar 

  21. Global risk Miyamoto, Reconnaissance Report on 2007 Niigata Chuetsu-Oki Japan Earthquake

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jain SK et.al (2001) A field report on structural and geotechnical damages sustained during the 26 January 2001 M7.9 Bhuj Earthquake in Western India

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rai DC, Murty CVR (2005) Engineering lessons not learnt from 2002 Diglipur earthquake-a review after 2004 Sumatra earthquake. Curr Sci 89(10):1681–1689

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kaushik HB, Dasgupta K, Sahoo DR, Kharel G (2006) Performance of structures during the Sikkim earthquake of 14 February 06. Curr Sci 91(4):449–455

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rai DC, Murty CVR (2002) Reconnaissance report North Andaman (Diglipur) Earthquake of 14 September 2002

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jankowski R, Wilde K, Fujino Y (1998) Pounding of superstructure segments in isolated elevated bridge during earthquakes

    Google Scholar 

  27. Davis RO (1992) Pounding of buildings modeled by an impact oscillator. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 21:253–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chau KT, Wei XX (2001) Pounding of structures modelled as non-linear impacts of two oscillators. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 30:633–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chau KT, Wei XX, Guo X, Shen CY (2003) Experimental and theoretical simulations of seismic poundings between two adjacent structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 32:537–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jankowski R (2005) Non-linear viscoelastic modelling of earthquake-induced structural pounding. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 34:595–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ye K, Li L, Zhu H (2008) A note on the hertz contact model with non-linear damping for pounding simulation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn

    Google Scholar 

  32. Muthukumar S, DesRoches R (2006) A hertz contact model with nonlinear damping for pounding simulation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 35:811–828

    Google Scholar 

  33. Papadrakakis M, Mouzakis HP (1994) Earthquake simulator testing of pounding between adjacent buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 24:811–834

    Google Scholar 

  34. Anagnostopoulos SA, Spiliopoulos KV (1992) An investigation of earthquake induced pounding between adjacent buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 21:289–302

    Google Scholar 

  35. Goltabar AM, Kami RS, Ebadi A (2008) Study of impact between adjacent structures during of earthquake and their effective parameters. Am J Eng Appl Sci 210–218

    Google Scholar 

  36. Abdel-Mooty M, Al-Atrpy H, Ghouneim M (2009) Modeling and analysis of factors affecting seismic pounding of adjacent multi-story buildings. In: Earthquake resistant engineering structures VII, p 127

    Google Scholar 

  37. Westermo BD (1989) The dynamics of inter-structural connection to prevent pounding. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 18:687–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Raheem A, Hayashikawa T (2013) Mitigation measures for expansion joint effects on seismic performance of bridge structures. In: Asia pacific conference

    Google Scholar 

  39. Cheng X, Jing W, Qi L, Gong L (2019) Pounding dynamic responses and mitigation measures of sliding base-isolated concrete rectangular liquid storage structures, KSCE J Civil Eng 23(7):3146–3161

    Google Scholar 

  40. Dutta NK, Ghosh AD (2021) Vibration control of seismically excited adjacent buildings prone to pounding by use of friction dampers. In: Advances in structural vibration, lecture notes in mechanical engineering, select proceedings of ICOVP 2017, Springer

    Google Scholar 

  41. Das M, Ghosh (Dey) A (2016) Mitigation of structural pounding by the tuned mass damper. In: Proceedings SEC–2016 (Structural Engineering Convention) CSIR-SERC Chennai, India

    Google Scholar 

  42. Chenna R, Ramancharla PK (2012) Study of impact between adjacent buildings: comparison of CODAL provision. 15 WCCE, LISBOA

    Google Scholar 

  43. Uniform Building Code (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  44. NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings FEMA:273–1997

    Google Scholar 

  45. NZS 4203:1992 New Zealand standard code of practice for general structural design and design loadings for buildings

    Google Scholar 

  46. International Building Code (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  47. ASCE:7–2010 Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures

    Google Scholar 

  48. IS-1893-Part 1- 2016 Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures, General Provisions and Buildings

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aparna (Dey) Ghosh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Indian Society of Earthquake Technology

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

(Dey) Ghosh, A., Kumar, A. (2023). Seismic Induced Pounding of Structures and Its Mitigation. In: Sitharam, T.G., Kolathayar, S., Jakka, R.S., Matsagar, V. (eds) Theory and Practice in Earthquake Engineering and Technology. Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2324-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2324-1_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-2323-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-2324-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics