Skip to main content

Image Classification Based on Inception-v3 and a Mixture of Handcrafted Features

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Distributed Computing and Optimization Techniques

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 903))

Abstract

Annotating, retrieving and classifying images in an ever increasing large image datasets with semantic information is still an exigent task. Image pre-processing plays a vital role in partitioning an image into small meaningful regions and extracting features from these regions can be used to stimulate the learning models for better and accurate image classification. Deeplabv3+ framework based on dilated convolution is used to separate out the semantic regions and Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG) technique is applied to these regions and computed the distribution of gradients as features. A comparative analysis and examination of various Machine Learning classifiers using edge based, semantically segmented features are compared against the state-of-the-art deep learning techniques. The proposed deep learning based Inception-v3 architecture enables dynamic object recognition with factorized convolution and parameter reduction. The proposed model outperforms hand crafted ML classifiers, shows a significant performance improvement on much diverse dataset like Caltech-256 in comparison with Caltech 101.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mahantesh K, Shubha Rao A (2019) Content based image retrieval - inspired by computer vision & deep learning techniques. In: 2019 4th international conference on electrical, electronics, communication, computer technologies and optimization techniques (ICEECCOT), pp 371–377. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEECCOT46775.2019.9114610

  2. Ray S (2019) A quick review of machine learning algorithms. In: 2019 international conference on machine learning, big data, cloud and parallel computing (COMITCon), pp 35–39. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMITCon.2019.8862451

  3. Obulesu O, Mahendra M, ThrilokReddy M (2018) Machine learning techniques and tools: a survey. In: 2018 international conference on inventive research in computing applications (ICIRCA), pp 605–611. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIRCA.2018.8597302

  4. Shrestha A, Mahmood A (2019) Review of deep learning algorithms and architectures. IEEE Access 7:53040–53065. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2912200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chowdhury S, Schoen MP (2020) Research paper classification using supervised machine learning techniques. In: 2020 intermountain engineering, technology and computing (IETC), pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/IETC47856.2020.9249211

  6. Tamilselvi P, Kumar KA (2017) Unsupervised machine learning for clustering the infected leaves based on the leaf-colours. In: 2017 third international conference on science technology engineering & management (ICONSTEM), pp 106–110. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICONSTEM.2017.8261265

  7. Le Nguyen MH, Gomes HM, Bifet A (2019) Semi-supervised learning over streaming data using MOA. In: 2019 IEEE international conference on big data (Big Data), pp 553–562. https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData47090.2019.9006217

  8. Locatello F, Bauer S, Lucic M, Raetsch G, Gelly S, Schölkopf B, Bachem O (2019) Challenging common assumptions in the unsupervised learning of disentangled representations. In: Proceedings of the 36th international conference on machine learning. PMLR, vol 97, pp 4114–4124

    Google Scholar 

  9. Frankle J, Carbin M (2019) The lottery ticket hypothesis: finding sparse, trainable neural networks. In: International conference on learning representations

    Google Scholar 

  10. Metz L, Maheswaranathan N, Cheung B, Sohl-Dickstein J (2018) Meta-learning update rules for unsupervised representation learning. CoRR

    Google Scholar 

  11. Taher KA, Mohammed Yasin Jisan B, Rahman MM (2019) Network intrusion detection using supervised machine learning technique with feature selection. In: 2019 international conference on robotics, electrical and signal processing techniques (ICREST), pp 643–646. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICREST.2019.8644161

  12. Liu L, Jiang H, He P, Chen W, Liu X, Gao J, Han J (2019) On the variance of the adaptive learning rate and beyond. CoRR

    Google Scholar 

  13. Korkmaz SA, Akçiçek A, Bínol H, Korkmaz MF (2017) Recognition of the stomach cancer images with probabilistic HOG feature vector histograms by using HOG features. In: 2017 IEEE 15th international symposium on intelligent systems and informatics (SISY), pp 000339–000342. https://doi.org/10.1109/SISY.2017.8080578

  14. Weixing L, Haijun S, Feng P, Qi G, Bin Q (2015) A fast pedestrian detection via modified HOG feature. In: 2015 34th Chinese control conference (CCC), pp 3870–3873. https://doi.org/10.1109/ChiCC.2015.7260236

  15. Nguyen N, Bui D, Tran X (2019) A novel hardware architecture for human detection using HOG-SVM co-optimization. In: 2019 IEEE Asia Pacific conference on circuits and systems (APCCAS), pp 33–36. https://doi.org/10.1109/APCCAS47518.2019.8953123

  16. Park W, Kim D, Suryanto CL, Roh TM, Ko S (2012) Fast human detection using selective block-based HOG-LBP. In: 2012 19th IEEE international conference on image processing, pp 601–604. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2012.6466931

  17. Shyla NSJ, Emmanuel WRS (2021) Automated classification of glaucoma using DWT and HOG features with extreme learning machine. In: Third international conference on intelligent communication technologies and virtual mobile networks (ICICV), pp 725–730. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICV50876.2021.9388376

  18. Wang X, Xu P, Yu Z, Li F (2020) Image object extraction based on semantic segmentation and label loss. IEEE Access 8:109325–109334. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2999942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Li X, Ma H, Luo X (2020) Weaklier supervised semantic segmentation with only one image level annotation per category. IEEE Trans Image Process 29:128–141. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2019.2930874

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Pan X, Li L, Yang D, He Y, Liu Z, Yang H (2019) An accurate nuclei segmentation algorithm in pathological image based on deep semantic network. IEEE Access 7:110674–110686. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2934486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xie C et al (2021) Image style transfer algorithm based on semantic segmentation. IEEE Access 9:54518–54529. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3054969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim M, Park B, Chi S (2020) Accelerator-aware fast spatial feature network for real-time semantic segmentation. IEEE Access 8:226524–226537. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3045147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang L, Zhou W, Li J, Li J, Lou X (2020) Histogram of oriented gradients feature extraction without normalization. In: IEEE Asia Pacific conference on circuits and systems (APCCAS), pp 252–255. https://doi.org/10.1109/APCCAS50809.2020.9301715

  24. Libiao J, Wenchao Z, Changyu L, Zheng W (2021) Semantic segmentation based on DeeplabV3+ with multiple fusions of low-level features. In: IEEE 5th advanced information technology. Electronic and automation control conference (IAEAC), pp 1957–1963. https://doi.org/10.1109/IAEAC50856.2021.9390753

  25. Rao AS, Mahantesh K (2021) Learning semantic features for classifying very large image datasets using convolution neural network. SN Comput. Sci. 2:187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-021-00589-6

  26. Bamne B, Shrivastava N, Parashar L, Singh U (2020) Transfer learning-based object detection by using convolutional neural networks. In: International conference on electronics and sustainable communication systems (ICESC), pp 328–332. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICESC48915.2020.9156060

  27. Wu X, Liu R, Yang H, Chen Z (2020) An xception based convolutional neural network for scene image classification with transfer learning. In: 2020 2nd international conference on information technology and computer application (ITCA), pp 262–267. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITCA52113.2020.00063.

  28. Berg TL, Berg AC, Malik J (2005) Shape matching and object recognition using low distortion correspondence. In: IEEE CVPR, vol 1, pp 26–33

    Google Scholar 

  29. Grauman K, Darell (2006) Pyramid match kernels: discriminative classification with sets of image features. Technical report MIT-CSAIL-TR-2006-020

    Google Scholar 

  30. Maire M, Malik J, Zhang H, Berg AC (2006) SVM-KNN: discriminative nearest neighbor classification for visual category recognition. In: IEEE-CVPR, vol 2, pp 2126–2136

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mc Cann S, Lowe DG (2012) Local naive bayes nearest neighbor for image classification. In: IEEE-CVPR, pp 3650–3656

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mutch J, Lowe DG (2006) Multiclass object recognition with sparse, localized features. In: IEEE CVPR, vol 1, pp 11–18

    Google Scholar 

  33. González G, Türetken E, Benmansour F, Rigamonti R, Lepetit V (2014) On the relevance of sparsity for image classification. Comput Vis Image Underst 125:115127

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mahantesh K, Aradhya VNM, Niranjan SK (2014) An impact of complex hybrid color space in image segmentation. In: Recent advances in intelligent informatics. Advances in intelligent systems and computing, vol 235. Springer, pp 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01778-58

  35. Liu Y-J-D, Wang Y-X (2012) Learning dictionary on manifolds for image classification. Pattern Recogn 46:1879–1890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Vieira AW, Campos MF, Oliveira GL, Nascimento ER (2012) Sparse spatial coding: a novel approach for efficient and accurate object recognition. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), pp 2592–2598

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang Y, Zheng Y, Liu B, Wang Y (2012) Discriminant sparse coding for image classification. In: Proceedings of the 37th international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing, pp 2193–2196

    Google Scholar 

  38. Holub A, Griffin G, Perona P (2007) Caltech 256 object category dataset. Technical report, California Institute of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  39. Banerji CLS, Sinha A (2013) New image descriptors based on color, texture, shape, and wavelets for object and scene image classification. Neurocomputing 117:173–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Shubha Rao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Shubha Rao, A., Mahantesh, K. (2022). Image Classification Based on Inception-v3 and a Mixture of Handcrafted Features. In: Majhi, S., Prado, R.P.d., Dasanapura Nanjundaiah, C. (eds) Distributed Computing and Optimization Techniques. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 903. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2281-7_49

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2281-7_49

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-2280-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-2281-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics