Skip to main content

Mechanical Behavior of Geotextile and Geogrids on Soil Stabilization: A Review

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Advances in Mechanical Engineering

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Abstract

Geosynthetic is a versatile innovation that revolutionized the construction industry. Soils like silty sands and clay make it furthermore difficult to be used for construction purposes. For these types of soils to be used as a foundation material or as a subgrade material, it needs to be stabilized either physically or chemically. The process, however, not economically feasible in most cases. A sustainable alternative is by reinforcing poor soils with geosynthetic materials. This paper is a study about how the planar forms of geosynthetics—geotextiles and geogrids—interact with the soil system and results in increased bearing capacity with minimum settlements. It is observed that by the inclusion of geosynthetic layers, the settlement was found to be reduced by 20% in almost all cases which shows the effectiveness of the reinforcement. It is also noted that an increased number of geosynthetic layers, up to 2, increases the bearing capacity and remains constant with further addition. Due to their interlocking properties, geogrids prove to be a better reinforcing material than geotextiles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

D 10 :

Effective particle size of soil

D 50 :

Mean size of soil particles.

C u :

Coefficient of uniformity

C c :

Coefficient of curvature

D :

Depth of footing

B :

Width of footing

N :

Number of reinforcement layers c-cohesion

ɸ :

Angle of internal friction

q u :

Ultimate bearing capacity of soil

BCR:

Bearing capacity ratio

U :

Depth of the first layer of reinforcement from the bottom of the footing

b :

Width of the reinforcement layer

γ :

Bulk density of soil

γ dmin :

Minimum dry density of soil

γ dmax :

Maximum dry density of soil

MD:

Tensile strength in machine direction

XMD:

Tensile strength in the cross-machine direction

References

  1. Vidal H (1969) The principle of reinforced earth. Geotech Spec Publ 118(II):1331–1346

    Google Scholar 

  2. Haeri SM, Noorzad R, Oskoorouchi AM (2000) Effect of geotextile reinforcement on the mechanical behavior of sand. Geotext Geomembranes 18(6):385–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-1144(00)00005-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rashidian V, Naeini SA, Mirzakhanlari M (2018) Laboratory testing and numerical modelling on bearing capacity of geotextile-reinforced granular soils. Int J Geotech Eng 12(3):241–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2016.1269042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen J (2020) Geotext Geomembranes. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2020.10.011

  5. Tavakoli Mehrjardi G, Khazaei M (2017) Scale effect on the behaviour of geogrid-reinforced soil under repeated loads. Geotext Geomembranes 45(6):603–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.08.002

  6. Tavangar Y, Shooshpasha I (2016) Experimental and numerical study of bearing capacity and effect of specimen size on uniform sand with medium density, reinforced with nonwoven geotextile. Arab J Sci Eng 41(10):4127–4137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-016-2101-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gamal AM, Belal AM, Elsoud SA (2013) Numerical modeling of geogrid reinforced soil bed under strip footings using finite element analysis. Int J Civ Environ Eng 10(1):1200–1207 [Online]. Available: dai.waset.org/1307-6892/40815

    Google Scholar 

  8. Şadoğlu E (2015) Numerical analysis of centrally and eccentrically loaded strip footing on geotextile-reinforced sand. Geosynth Int 22(3):225–234. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.15.00007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kazi M, Shukla SK, Habibi D (2015) An improved method to increase the load-bearing capacity of strip footing resting on geotextile-reinforced sand bed. Indian Geotech J 45(1):98–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-014-0111-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Naeini SA, Gholampoor N (2014) Cyclic behaviour of dry silty sand reinforced with a geotextile. Geotext Geomembranes 42(6):611–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2014.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Abu-Farsakh M, Chen Q, Sharma R (2013) An experimental evaluation of the behavior of footings on geosynthetic-reinforced sand. Soils Found 53(2):335–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2013.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sharma R, Chen Q, Abu-Farsakh M, Yoon S (2009) Analytical modeling of geogrid reinforced soil foundation. Geotext Geomembranes 27(1):63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. El Sawwaf M, Nazir AK (2010) Behavior of repeatedly loaded rectangular footings resting on reinforced sand. Alexandria Eng J 49(4):349–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2010.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Basudhar PK, Dixit PM, Gharpure A, Deb K (2008) Finite element analysis of geotextile-reinforced sand-bed subjected to strip loading. Geotext Geomembranes 26(1):91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2007.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Athanasopoulos GA (1993) Effect of particle size on the mechanical behaviour of sand-geotextile composites. Geotext Geomembranes 12(3):255–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-1144(93)90029-N

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kazi M, Shukla SK, Habibi D (2015) Effect of submergence on settlement and bearing capacity of surface strip footing on geotextile-reinforced sand bed. Int J Geosynth Gr Eng 1(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-014-0006-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kazi M, Shukla SK, Habibi D (2016) Behaviour of an embedded footing on geotextile-reinforced sand. Proc Inst Civ Eng Gr Improv 169(2):120–133. https://doi.org/10.1680/grim.14.00022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Aria S, Kumar Shukla S, Mohyeddin A (2019) Numerical investigation of wraparound geotextile reinforcement technique for strengthening foundation soil. Int J Geomech 19(4):04019003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0001361

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Anusha Raj .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sinha, P., Anusha Raj, K., Kumar, S., Singh, D. (2023). Mechanical Behavior of Geotextile and Geogrids on Soil Stabilization: A Review. In: Manik, G., Kalia, S., Verma, O.P., Sharma, T.K. (eds) Recent Advances in Mechanical Engineering. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2188-9_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2188-9_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-2187-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-2188-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics