Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of the Improved Control of Three-Phase Two-Level and Multi-level Inverters with Sinusoidal (SPWM) and Space Vector (SVPWM) Control for Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Systems (PV)

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of Seventh International Congress on Information and Communication Technology

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 448))

  • 470 Accesses

Abstract

This article is a proposal toward improved control of the three-phase two-level and multi-level photovoltaic inverter with two new control methods, by the sinusoidal (SPWM) and space vector (SVPWM) control for a nonlinear load. The contribution of this study concerns the strategies of control of the active and reactive power injected by this inverter in the grid in order to improve the losses of harmonics current in the grid. The main objective of this method is to respond to the problems encountered with the photovoltaic inverter to effectively filter the harmonics of the current. After comparing the results of the two systems, our findings suggest that the current THDi of the interlaced (multi-level) inverter is lower than that obtained with the two-level inverter, provide higher-quality waveforms, reducing current and losses caused by high-frequency harmonics. The simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of these propose techniques in this work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lamreoua A, Benslimane A, Messaoudi A, Aziz A, El Ouariachi M (2018) Comparison of the different commands direct and indirect of a single-phase in-verter for Photovoltaic’. In: ICEERE international conference on electronic engineering and renewable energy, Laboratory of Electrical Engineering and Maintenance (LEEM), BP:473 Higher School of Technology, University of Mohammed I, Oujda, Morocco, April (2018), pp 576–586

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wei J, Bai D, Yang L (2015) Polymer photovoltaic cells with rhenium oxide as anode interlayer. PLoS One 10:e0133725. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133725 PMID: 26226439 2 (Public Library of Science)

  3. Trinh Q-N, Lee H-H (2014) An enhanced grid current compensator for grid-connected distributed generation under nonlinear loads and grid voltage distortions. IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  4. Timbus A, Liserre M, Teodorescu R, Rodriguez P, Blaabjerg F (2009) Evaluation of current controllers for distributed power generation systems. Power Electron IEEE Trans IEEE 24:654–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xu G, Moulema P, Ge L, Song H, Yu W (2016) A unified framework for secured energy resource management in smart grid. Smart Grid 73–96 (CRC Press)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Golovanov N, Lazaroiu GC, Roscia M, Zaninelli D (2013) Power quality assessment in small scale renewable energy sources supplying distribution systems. Energies 6:634–645 (Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sultani JF (2013) Modelling, design and implementation of D-Q in single-phase grid connected inverters for photovoltaic systems used in domestic dwellings. Faculty of Technology De Montfort University Leicester, UK

    Google Scholar 

  8. Noman AM, Addoweesh KE, Alabduljabbar AA, Alolah AI (2019) Cascaded H-bridge MLI and three-phase cascaded VSI topologies for grid-connected photovoltaic systems with distributed MPPT. Int J Photoenergy 2019. Article ID 7642919, 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7642919

  9. Naderipour A, Guerrero JM (2017) An improved synchronous reference frame cur-rent control strategy for a photovoltaic grid-connected inverter under unbalanced and nonlinear load conditions. PLOS ONE. 10.1371 journal pone 0164856 Feb 13, 2017

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bengourina MR (2017) Direct power control of a grid connected photovoltaic system, associated with an active power filter. Revue des Energies Renouvelables 20(1):99–109

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lamreoua A, Benslimane A, Bouchnaif J, El Ouariachi M (2021) An improved sinusoidal (PWM) and vector (SVPWM) current control for a three-phase photovoltaic inverter connected to a non-linear load. In: Proceedings of ICEERE 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6259-4_51.Print ISBN: 978-981-15-6258-7. Online ISBN: 978-981-15-6259-4n

  12. RaoVadlamudi SV (2016) Decoupled DQ-PLL with Positive Sequence Voltage Normali-zation for Wind Turbine LVRT Control; 25–27 Oct 2016, Sands Expo and Convention Centre, Marina Bay Sands, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bengourina MR (2017) Direct power control of a grid connected photovoltaic system,associated with an active power filter. Revue des Energies Renouvelables 20:99–109

    Google Scholar 

  14. Purushotham M (2019) Reinforced droop for active current sharing in parallel NPC inverter for Islanded AC microgrid application. MDPI energies, 11 Aug 2019

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mahamat C, Petit M, Costa F (2018) Analyse et commandes des convertisseurs multi-niveaux pour un générateur photovoltaïque connecté au réseau électrique. Energie électrique. Université Paris Saclay (COmUE), 2018. Français. ffNNT: 2018SACLN024

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wu T-F, Chang C-H, Lin L-C, Yu G-R, Chang Y-R (2014) A D-Σ digital control for three-phase inverter to achieve active and reactive power injection. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 61(8):3879–3890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Naderipour A, Guerrero JM (2017) An improved synchronous reference frame current control strategy for a photovoltaic grid-connected inverter under unbalanced and nonlinear load conditions. PLOS ONE. 10.1371 journal pone 0164856 February 13, 2017

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jain P, Deshmukh SP (2020) Design of three-phase five-level cascaded H bridge inverter with boost converter. Int J Electron Pages 478–498

    Google Scholar 

  19. RaoVadlamudi SV (2016) Decoupled DQ-PLL with positive sequence voltage normali-zation for wind turbine LVRT control. Sands Expo and Convention Centre, Marina Bay Sands, Singapore 25–27 Oct 2016

    Google Scholar 

  20. Purushotham M (2019) Reinforced droop for active current sharing in parallel NPC inverter for Islanded AC microgrid application. MDPI energies 11 Aug 201

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hasan MM, Abu-Siada A, Islam MR (2016) Design and implementation of a novel three-phase cascaded half-bridge inverter. IET Power Electron. ISSN 1755-4535

    Google Scholar 

  22. S. M. I. M. M. L.-C. L. a. C.-W. H. Wu TF (2017) An improved resonant frequency based systematic LCL filter design method for grid-connected inverter. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2017.2682004

  23. Babaei E, Alilu S, Laali S (2014) A new general topology for cascaded multilevel inverters with reduced number of components based on developed H-bridge. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 61(8):3932–3939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Houssem Chaouali HO (2017) Improving the control strategy of a standalone photovoltaic pumping system by fuzzy logic technique. (IJACSA) Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl 8(3)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Electrical Engineering and Maintenance (LEEM), BP: 473 Higher School of Technology, University of Mohammed I, Oujda, Morocco

    Abdelhak Lamreoua, Jamal Bouchnaif & Mostafa El Ouariachi

  2. Laboratory Renewable Energy, Embedded System and Information Processing, National School of Applied Sciences, University of Mohammed I, Oujda, Morocco

    Anas Benslimane & Mostafa El Ouariachi

Authors
  1. Abdelhak Lamreoua
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anas Benslimane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jamal Bouchnaif
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mostafa El Ouariachi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Middlesex University, London, UK

    Xin-She Yang

  2. The University of Reading, Reading, UK

    Simon Sherratt

  3. JIS University, Kolkata, India

    Nilanjan Dey

  4. Global Knowledge Research Foundation, Ahmedabad, India

    Amit Joshi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lamreoua, A., Benslimane, A., Bouchnaif, J., Ouariachi, M.E. (2023). Comparison of the Improved Control of Three-Phase Two-Level and Multi-level Inverters with Sinusoidal (SPWM) and Space Vector (SVPWM) Control for Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Systems (PV). In: Yang, XS., Sherratt, S., Dey, N., Joshi, A. (eds) Proceedings of Seventh International Congress on Information and Communication Technology. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 448. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1610-6_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1610-6_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-1609-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-1610-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation