Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analyzing the Causes of Conflicts and Disputes in Modular Construction Projects

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conference 2021 (CSCE 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 251))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 758 Accesses

Abstract

Conflicts, claims, and disputes cause cost and schedule overruns in construction projects. Previous research studies have considered contractual risks as one of the main factors affecting the performance of modular construction projects. In fact, modularization requires unique contractual agreements that foster the successful implementation of such construction method. This paper identifies the causes of disputes in modular construction projects. To this end, a multi-step interrelated research methodology was used. First, the authors collected and analyzed 15 actual national case studies reflecting disputes in modular construction projects. Second, social network analysis was conducted where frequency analysis and centrality measures were used to identify the top causes of disputes as well as understand the dispute causation network in modular construction projects. The results showed that the common causes of disputes in modular projects include: (1) delays in work progress, (2) lack of team spirit, and (3) lack of communication. The analysis of the dispute causation network identified the lack of collaborative environment and adequate communication among the project stakeholders as primary contractual risks in modular projects. Ultimately, this paper adds to the body of knowledge by helping practitioners in better understanding the contractual risks that should be addressed to minimize disputes in modular construction projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. El-adaway IH, Ali GG, Abotaleb IS, Barber HM Jr (2020) Studying the relationship between stock prices of publicly traded US construction companies and gross domestic product: preliminary step toward construction–economy nexus. J Constr Eng Manage 146(1):04019087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barbosa F, Woetzel J, Mischke J, Ribeirinho MJ, Sridhar M, Parsons M, Brown S (2017) Reinventing construction: a route to higher productivity. McKinsey Global Institute, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  3. Duncheva T, Bradley FF (2019) Multifaceted productivity comparison of off-site timber manufacturing strategies in Mainland Europe and the United Kingdom. J Constr Eng Manage 145(8):04019043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Abdul Nabi M, Ali G, El-adaway IH, Garza LA, Tichy S, Girse J (2021) Contractual guidelines for substantial completion under national design-build standard forms of contract. J Leg Aff Disput Resolut Eng Constr 13(1):04520043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Assaad R, Elsayegh A, Ali G, Abdul Nabi M, El-adaway IH (2020) Back-to-back relationship under standard subcontract agreements: comparative study. J Leg Aff Disput Resolut Eng Constr 12(3):04520020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jaillon L, Poon CS (2009) The evolution of prefabricated residential building systems in Hong Kong: a review of the public and the private sector. Autom Constr 18(3):239–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Enshassi MS, Walbridge S, West JS, Haas CT (2019) Integrated risk management framework for tolerance-based mitigation strategy decision support in modular construction projects. J Manag Eng 35(4):05019004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. O’Connor JT, O’Brien WJ, Choi JO (2015) Standardization strategy for modular industrial plants. J Constr Eng Manag 141(9):04015026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nadim W, Goulding JS (2011) Offsite production: a model for building down barriers: a European construction industry perspective. Eng Constr Archit Manag 18(1):82–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Arashpour M, Abbasi B, Arashpour M, Hosseini MR, Yang R (2017) Integrated management of on-site, coordination and off-site uncertainty: theorizing risk analysis within a hybrid project setting. Int J Project Manage 35(4):647–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Haas CT, O’Connor JT, Tucker RL, Eickmann JA, Fagerlund WR (2000) Prefabrication and preassembly trends and effects on the construction workforce. Center for Construction Industry Studies, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX

    Google Scholar 

  12. Swistun M (2018) Offsite construction—why it is important for the survival of your firm.” https://www.bdcnetwork.com/blog/offsite-construction-why-it%E2%80%99s-important-survival-your-firm. Accessed 14 Feb 2002

  13. Assaad R, El-adaway IH, Hastak M, Needy KL (2020) Commercial and legal considerations of offsite construction projects and their hybrid transactions. J Constr Eng Manag 146(12):05020019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Global Modular Construction Market Research Report (2017) Forecast to 2023: market scenario. https://www.reportbuyer.com/product/5376942/global-modular-construction-market-research-report-forecast-to-2023.html. Accessed 14 Feb 2021

  15. Research and Markets (2020) Modular construction market—growth, trends, and forecast (2020–2025). https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/4515000/modular-construction-market-growth-trendsand?utm_source=dynamic&utm_medium=GNOM&utm_code=4j24t6&utm_campaign=1336234+-+Modular+Construction+Market++Global+Forecast+to+2024%3a+Relocatable+Modular+Construction+-+A+Huge+Market+Potential&utm_exec=chdo54gnomd. Accessed 08 Dec 2020

  16. Blismas NG, Pendlebury M, Gibb A, Pasquire C (2005) Constraints to the use of off-site production on construction projects. Archit Eng Des Manage 1(3):153–162

    Google Scholar 

  17. Goodier C, Gibb A (2005) Barriers and opportunities for offsite in the UK. In: ICONDA (International Construction Database). International Council for Building Research, Studies and Documentation (CIB), Delft, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cakmak PI, Cakmak E (2013) An analysis of causes of disputes in the construction industry using analytical hierarchy process (AHP). AEI 2013: Building Solutions for Architectural Engineering, 94–102

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lee CY, Chong HY, Liao PC, Wang X (2017) Critical review of social network analysis applications in complex project management. J Manag Eng 34(2):04017061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Abdul Nabi M, El-adaway IH (2020) Modular construction: determining decision-making factors and future research needs. J Manag Eng 36(6):04020085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Aljassmi H, Han S, Davis S (2014) Project pathogens network: new approach to analyzing construction-defects-generation mechanisms. J Constr Eng Manage. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000774,04013028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Eteifa SO, El-Adaway IH (2018) Using social network analysis to model the interaction between root causes of fatalities in the construction industry. J Manag Eng 34(1):04017045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Isaac S, Bock T, Stoliar Y (2016) A methodology for the optimal modularization of building design. Autom Constr 65:116–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Arashpour M, Wakefield R, Blismas N, Minas J (2015) Optimization of process integration and multi-skilled resource utilization in off-site construction. Autom Constr 50:72–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yunus R, Yang J (2012) Critical sustainability factors in industrialised building systems. Constr Innov 12(4):447–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wong PS, Zwar C, Gharaie E (2017) Examining the drivers and states of organizational change for greater use of prefabrication in construction projects. J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143(7):04017020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jaillon L, Poon CS (2010) Design issues of using prefabrication in Hong Kong building construction. Constr Manag Econ 28(10):1025–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. O’Connor JT, O’Brien WJ, Choi JO (2014) Critical success factors and enablers for optimum and maximum industrial modularization. J Constr Eng Manag 140(6):04014012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hamzeh F, Abdul Ghani O, Saleh Bacha MB, Abbas Y (2017) Modular concrete construction: the differing perspectives of designers, manufacturers, and contractors in Lebanon. Eng Constr Archit Manag 24(6):935–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Choi JO, O’Connor JT, Kwak YH, Shrestha BK (2019) Modularization business case analysis model for industrial projects. J Manag Eng 35(3):04019004

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, USA

    M. Abdul Nabi & I. H. El-adaway

Authors
  1. M. Abdul Nabi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. I. H. El-adaway
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. H. El-adaway .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada

    Scott Walbridge

  2. Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Mazdak Nik-Bakht

  3. University of Regina, Regina, SK, Canada

    Kelvin Tsun Wai Ng

  4. Matrix Solutions Inc., Edmonton, AB, Canada

    Manas Shome

  5. University of British Columbia – Okanagan Campus, Kelowna, BC, Canada

    M. Shahria Alam

  6. University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada

    Ashraf el Damatty

  7. University of British Columbia – Okanagan Campus, Kelowna, BC, Canada

    Gordon Lovegrove

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Canadian Society for Civil Engineering

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Abdul Nabi, M., El-adaway, I.H. (2023). Analyzing the Causes of Conflicts and Disputes in Modular Construction Projects. In: Walbridge, S., et al. Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conference 2021 . CSCE 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 251. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1029-6_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1029-6_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-1028-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-1029-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation