Skip to main content

Discernment of Unsolicited Internet Spamdexing Using Graph Theory

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Inventive Systems and Control

Abstract

With the advent of technology, spamming of web pages which is a methodology by which the imposter pages get a higher rank than the true or genuine pages in the search engine’s results to have become prevalent. It poses a gigantic issue for search engines, making it essential for search engines to be able to catch hold and identify spam web pages during crawling. One of the ways in which this issue can be visualized is by considering the underlying web graph structure and the directed URL links(edges) between different spam and true web hosts(nodes), as well as the content attributes of each of the web pages. This graph structure on being fed to an inductive graph neural network model for training purposes will enforce the model to efficiently categorize the new, previously unseen web hosts as web spam or genuine. A GraphSAGE model was developed for carrying out node classification that would leverage the web content attribute data to create node embeddings for the entirely new, unseen web host nodes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fetterly D (2007) Adversarial information retrieval: the manipulation of web content. ACM Computing Reviews

    Google Scholar 

  2. Liu B (2007) Web data mining: exploring hyperlinks, contents, and usage data. Springer Science & Business Media

    Google Scholar 

  3. Convey E (1996) Porn sneaks way back on web. The Boston Herald 28

    Google Scholar 

  4. Henzinger MR, Motwani R, Silverstein C (2002) Challenges in web search engines. ACM SIGIR Forum 36(2). ACM, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  5. Silverstein C et al (1999) Analysis of a very large web search engine query log. ACM Sigir Forum 33(1). ACM, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  6. Joachims T et al (2017) Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback. ACM SIGIR Forum 51(1). ACM, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jia Z et al (2012) Research on web spam detection based on support vector machine. In: 2012 international conference on communication systems and network technologies. IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  8. Najork M (2009) Web spam detection. Encycl Database Syst 1:3520–3523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Prieto VM et al (2012) Analysis and detection of web spam by means of web content. In: Information retrieval facility conference. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  10. Amitay E et al (2003) The connectivity sonar: detecting site functionality by structural patterns. In: Proceedings of the fourteenth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia

    Google Scholar 

  11. Karimpour J, Noroozi AA, Alizadeh S (2012) Web spam detection by learning from small labeled samples. Int J Comput Appl 50(21)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ntoulas A et al (2006) Detecting spam web pages through content analysis. In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on world wide web

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tian Y, Weiss GM, Ma Q (2007) A semi-supervised approach for web spam detection using combinatorial feature-fusion. In: Proceedings of the graph labelling workshop and web spam challenge at the European conference on machine learning and principles and practice of knowledge discovery

    Google Scholar 

  14. Becchetti L et al (2006) Link-based characterization and detection of web spam. AIRWeb

    Google Scholar 

  15. Arnon R, Apichat T, Bundit M (2011) Spam host detection using ant colony optimization. IT convergence and services. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 13–21

    Google Scholar 

  16. Silva RM, Yamakami A, Almeida TA (2012) An analysis of machine learning methods for spam host detection. In: 2012 11th international conference on machine learning and applications, vol 2. IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  17. Castillo C et al (2007) Know your neighbors: web spam detection using the web topology. In: Proceedings of the 30th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dai N, Davison BD, Qi X (2009) Looking into the past to better classify web spam. In: Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on adversarial information retrieval on the web

    Google Scholar 

  19. Page L et al (1999) The PageRank citation ranking: bringing order to the web. Stanford InfoLab

    Google Scholar 

  20. Xiao L, Wu X, Wang G (2019) Social network analysis based on graph SAGE. In: 2019 12th international symposium on computational intelligence and design (ISCID), vol 2. IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  21. “Web Spam Collections”. http://chato.cl/webspam/datasets/ Crawled by the Laboratory of Web Algorithmics, University of Milan, http://law.di.unimi.it/. URLs retrieved 05 2007

  22. Hamilton WL, Ying R, Leskovec J (2017) Inductive representation learning on large graphs. In: Proceedings of the 31st international conference on neural information processing systems

    Google Scholar 

  23. Özçelik R (2019) An intuitive explanation of graphsage. http://towardsdatascience.com/an-intuitive-explanation-of-graphsage-6df9437ee64f

  24. Kingma DP, Ba J (2017) Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. arXiv:1412.6980

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Apeksha Kulkarni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kulkarni, A., Solani, D., Sanghavi, P., Kunchapu, A., Vijayalakshmi, M., Nair, S. (2022). Discernment of Unsolicited Internet Spamdexing Using Graph Theory. In: Suma, V., Baig, Z., Kolandapalayam Shanmugam, S., Lorenz, P. (eds) Inventive Systems and Control. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 436. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1012-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics