Abstract
This paper presents preliminary findings of a study of the flexural ductility of beams reinforced with ASTM A615 Grades 60 and 100, A706 Grades 60 and 80, or A1035 Grade 100 longitudinal steel bars. Moment–curvature relationships were generated for beams with reinforcement ratios varying between 0.3 and 1.5% with concrete compressive strengths between 30 and 90 MPa. Curvature ductility factors were computed. Regression analysis techniques were used to assess whether the ductility corresponding to a given mechanical reinforcement ratio were significantly different for the different steel grades. It is concluded that the curvature ductility factor is, in all cases investigated, essentially proportional to the inverse of the mechanical reinforcement ratio. The ductility factors for ASTM A615 Grade 100 reinforcement are markedly less than those for the other grades, suggesting that a more stringent target reliability index should be used to calibrate the resistance factor for ASTM A615 Grade 100 reinforcement.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ASTM (2020a) Standard specification for deformed and plain carbon-steel bars for concrete reinforcement (ASTM A615/A615M). American society for testing and materials (ASTM) International, West Conshohocken, PA
ASTM (2020b) Standard specification for deformed and plain, low-carbon, chromium steel bars for concrete reinforcement (ASTM A1035/A1035M). American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) International, West Conshohocken, PA
ASTM (2016) Standard specification for deformed and plain low-alloy steel bars for concrete reinforcement (ASTM A706/A706M). American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) International, West Conshohocken, PA
Carreira DJ, Chu KH (1985) Stress-strain relationship for plain concrete in compression. J Am Concrete Inst 82(6):797–804
Cohn M Z, Ghosh SK (1972) Flexural ductility of reinforced concrete sections. Publications, International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, Zurich. 32-II:89–108
CSA (2019) Design of concrete structures. Canadian Standards Association, Toronto, ON
Mander TJ, Matamoros AB (2019) Constitutive modeling and overstrength factors for reinforcing steel. ACI Struct J 116(3):219–232
Thorenfeldt E, Tomaszewicz, Jensen JJ (1987) Mechanical properties of high-strength concrete and application in design. In Proceedings of the symposium “utilization of high-strength concrete”. Stavanger, Norway. Tapir, Trondheim, pp 149–159
Van Weerdhuizen M, Bartlett FM (2020) Deflection at incipient failure as a warning-of-failure metric. ACI Struct J 117(4):233–241
Wee TH, Chin MS, Mansur MA (1996) Stress strain relationship of high strength concrete in compression. J Mater Civ Eng 8(2):70–76
Yosefani A (2018) Flexural strength, ductility, and serviceability of beams that contain high-strength steel reinforcement and high-grade concrete. Doctoral Thesis, Portland State University. Retrieved from https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds/4402/. 01 Mar 2021
Acknowledgements
Financial support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Canadian Society for Civil Engineering
About this paper
Cite this paper
Akbar, S., Bartlett, F.M., Youssef, A.M. (2023). Flexural Ductility of Concrete Beams Reinforced with High Strength Steel. In: Walbridge, S., et al. Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conference 2021 . CSCE 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 248. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1004-3_51
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1004-3_51
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-1003-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-1004-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)