Skip to main content

Lessons Learned from UNLV’s Solar Decathlon 2017 Competition Experience—Design and Construction of a Modular House

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conference 2021 (CSCE 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 247))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 696 Accesses

Abstract

Many modular projects experience accidents and problems in practice, as there are many unique issues and challenges compared to conventional “stick-built” structures. In 2017, the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV) team designed, constructed, and transported a sustainable housing prototype for the U.S. Department of Energy’s Solar Decathlon competition. The competition requires students to build an efficient and innovative building powered by renewable energy. The project experienced several problems associated with its unique modular design. This paper presents the results of a qualitative case study to identify difficulties and generate recommendations for future modular projects. The authors collected data from key project participants using a survey comprised of specific questions. Results showed that the most critical problem throughout the project’s execution was communication among project participants and the managing organization. The main technical issues identified during construction were associated with the adequate performance of the integrated trailer chassis hitches. During the competition phase, the critical problem was the time crunch experienced due to delays caused by the chassis difficulties. Key suggested recommendations for future projects are: (1) integrating a general contractor for project organization to keep everything running smoothly; and (2) consistent and frequent communication throughout the design phase among all design and construction teams. These findings provide valuable information for future student modular project teams for designing, constructing, and transporting modular housing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akagi K, Murayama K, Yoshida M, Kawahata J (2002) Modularization technology in power plant construction. In: Proceedings of ICONE10 10th international conference on nuclear engineering Arlington, VA, Apr 14–18, pp 21–27

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bertram N, Fuchs S, Mischke J, Palter R, Strube G, Woetzel J (2019) Modular construction: from projects to products. McKinsey & Company: Capital Projects & Infrastructure, pp 1–34

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bhatla A, Pradhan B, Choi J (2016) Identifying wastes in construction process and implementing the last planner system in India. J Constr Eng Project Manage 6(1):34–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boafo FE, Kim JH, Kim JT (2016) Performance of modular prefabricated architecture: case study-based review and future pathways. Sustainability (Switzerland) 8(6):1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8060558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Choi JO, Chen XB, Kim TW (2017) Opportunities and challenges of modular methods in dense urban environment. Int J Constr Manag. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2017.1382093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Choi JO, O’Connor JT, Kim TW (2016) Recipes for cost and schedule successes in industrial modular projects: qualitative comparative analysis. J Constr Eng Manag 142(10):04016055. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Court PF, Pasquire CL, Gibb GF, Bower D (2009) Modular assembly with postponement to improve health, safety, and productivity in construction. Pract Period Struct Des Constr 14(2):81–89. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1084-0680(2009)14:2(81)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Deemer GR (1996) Modularization reduces cost and unexpected delays. Hydrocarbon Process (Int ed.) 75(10):143–151

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fagerlund WR (2001) Decision framework for prefabrication, pre-assembly and modularization in industrial construction. The University of Texas at Austin, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ghannad P, Lee Y-C, Choi JO (2020) Feasibility and implications of the modular construction approach for rapid post-disaster recovery. Int J Industrialized Constr 1(1):64–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoover S, Snyder J, Cowles E (2018) New day, new mindset: rethinking offsite construction. FMI owner survey

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hu X, Chong HY, Wang X, London K (2019) Understanding stakeholders in offsite manufacturing: a literature review. J Constr Eng Manag 145(8):03119003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang Y, Zhao D, Wang D, Xing Y (2019) Sustainable performance of buildings through modular prefabrication in the construction phase: a comparative study. Sustainability (Switzerland) 11(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205658

  14. Kamali M, Hewage K (2017) Development of performance criteria for sustainability evaluation of modular versus conventional construction methods. J Clean Prod 142:3592–3606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kamali M, Hewage K, Sadiq R (2019) Conventional versus modular construction methods: a comparative cradle-to-gate LCA for residential buildings. Energy Build 204:109479

    Google Scholar 

  16. KPMG (2016) Smart construction: how offsite manufacturing can transform our industry

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lawson RM, Ogden RG, Bergin R (2012) Application of modular construction in high-rise buildings. J Archit Eng 18(2):148–154. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)ae.1943-5568.0000057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li L, Sui S (2015) Comprehensive benefits evaluation of sandwich exterior wall panel. In: Sustainable buildings and structures: proceedings of the 1st international conference on sustainable buildings and structures. Suzhou, PR China, Oct 29–Nov 1, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  19. McGraw Hill Construction (2011) Prefabrication and modularization: increasing productivity in the construction industry. McGraw-Hill Construction. Smart Market Report, Bedford (MA)

    Google Scholar 

  20. O’Connor JT, O’Brien WJ, Choi JO (2015) Standardization strategy for modular industrial plants. J Constr Eng Manag 141(9):4015026. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. O’Connor JT, O’Brien WJ, Choi JO (2016) Industrial project execution planning: modularization versus stick-built. Pract Period Struct Des Constr 21(1):04015014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)sc.1943-5576.0000270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. US Dept of Energy (2021) About Solar Decathlon. https://www.solardecathlon.gov/about.html. Accessed 2 Mar 2021

  23. Wong PSP, Zwar C, Gharaie E (2017) Examining the drivers and states of organizational change for greater use of prefabrication in construction projects. J Constr Eng Manag 143(7):04017020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wuni IY, Shen GQ (2020) Barriers to the adoption of modular integrated construction: systematic review and meta-analysis, integrated conceptual framework, and strategies. J Cleaner Prod 249:119347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119347

  25. Zhai X, Reed R, Mills A (2014) Embracing offsite innovation in construction in China to enhance a sustainable built environment in urban housing. Int J Constr Manag 14(3):123–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2014.922727

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express their gratitude to the interviewees who donated their time to this study. The authors also thank UNLV’s Solar Decathlon 2017 team members for their excellent work and success in their competition.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seungtaek Lee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Solar Decathlon Survey

Please answer the following questions to the best of your ability, the information provided from these surveys will be compiled for a paper regarding best practices and lessons learned from the 2017 Solar Decathlon competition.

Name:

Project Role:

1. What were some of the major problems experienced during the construction phase through the competition phase? Please explain in some detail.

2. What solutions were used for the problems mentioned above? Please explain in some detail.

3. In hindsight, could any of the solutions be improved for the future, if so, how? Also, on that note, which problems could have been avoided and how? Please explain in some detail.

4. With the knowledge and experience you have now, would you be willing to participate in the next Solar Decathlon or comparable international events? Why or why not? Please explain in some detail.

5. Should UNLV compete, what advice would you give to the students participating in the 2020 Solar Decathlon competition?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Canadian Society for Civil Engineering

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Prestia, J., Choi, J.O., Lee, S., James, D. (2023). Lessons Learned from UNLV’s Solar Decathlon 2017 Competition Experience—Design and Construction of a Modular House. In: Walbridge, S., et al. Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conference 2021. CSCE 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 247. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0968-9_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0968-9_45

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-0967-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-0968-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics