Abstract
Buildings play a significant role toward meeting ambitious energy and emissions reduction targets by improving energy efficiency and enhancing indoor environmental quality (IEQ). Studies have indicated that good IEQ can enhance occupants' health, wellbeing, and productivity. Occupant feedback surveys are beneficial for gathering end-user perceptions and determining occupant requirements for efficient building operations and management. Identifying gaps in building performance provides opportunities to ensure that occupant IEQ needs are better addressed during the operations phase. This paper presents the results of occupant feedback surveys administered at an educational institution in the US. The 435 survey responses were analyzed to draw out the key findings in relation to the IEQ, occupant behavior, and occupant satisfaction. From the survey responses relating to temperature preferences, 65.5% of the participants indicated that they preferred temperatures between 20 °C (68 °F) and 21.67 °C (71 °F) in the winter. Overall, 48.1% were moderately dissatisfied, dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied with the thermal conditions in their office. The source of discomfort for most occupants was the inability to control the temperature since the thermostat was inaccessible or controlled by others. Occupant mean satisfaction with other IEQ parameters (i.e., lighting, air quality, and noise) are discussed. This paper also elucidates the critical factors from the occupant feedback surveys pertaining to IEQ in their work environments. It provides recommendations to improve IEQ and occupant satisfaction during the operations phase. Effective communication between the end-user and the building operations and maintenance department can potentially improve occupant satisfaction and lower energy consumption.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abraham Y, Zhao Z, Anumba C, Asadi S (2017) Implementation of a preference monitoring application for office building occupants. In: Lean and computing in construction congress, Heraklion, Greece
Abraham Y (2018) Integrating occupant values and preferences with building systems in conditioned environments. Ph.D., Pennsylvania State University
Abraham YS, Anumba CJ, Asadi S (2017) Data sensing approaches to monitoring building energy use and occupant behavior. In: Computing in civil engineering 2017, pp 239–247
ASHRAE/ANSI (2013) ASHRAE/ANSI Standard 55-2013 Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Atlanta, GA
Bland JM, Altman DG (1997) Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ 314(7080):572
Brick JM, Kalton G (1996) Handling missing data in survey research. Stat Methods Med Res 5(3):215–238
Delgoshaei P, Heidarinejad M, Xu K, Wentz JR, Delgoshaei P, Srebric J (2017) Impacts of building operational schedules and occupants on the lighting energy consumption patterns of an office space
Fisk WJ, Black D, Brunner G (2012) Changing ventilation rates in US offices: implications for health, work performance, energy, and associated economics. Build Environ 47:368–372
Fisk W, Seppanen O (2007) Providing better indoor environmental quality brings economic benefits
Gilani S, O’Brien W (2018) A preliminary study of occupants’ use of manual lighting controls in private offices: a case study. Energy Build 159:572–586
Heydarian A, Pantazis E, Carneiro JP, Gerber D, Becerik-Gerber B (2016) Lights, building, action: impact of default lighting settings on occupant behaviour. J Environ Psychol 48:212–223
Hong T, Lin H-W (2013) Occupant behavior: impact on energy use of private offices. Lawrence Berkeley National Lab (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
Hong T, Taylor-Lange SC, D’Oca S, Yan D, Corgnati SP (2016) Advances in research and applications of energy-related occupant behavior in buildings. Energy Build 116:694–702
Hong T, Yan D, D’Oca S, Chen C-F (2017) Ten questions concerning occupant behavior in buildings: the big picture. Build Environ 114:518–530
Huizenga C, Abbaszadeh S, Zagreus L, Arens EA (2006) Air quality and thermal comfort in office buildings: results of a large indoor environmental quality survey. Proc Healthy Build 2006(3):393–397
Kavulya G, Becerik-Gerber B (2012) Understanding the influence of occupant behavior on energy consumption patterns in commercial buildings. In: Computing in civil engineering, pp 569–576
Leaman A, Bordass B (2001) Assessing building performance in use 4: the probe occupant surveys and their implications. Build Res Inf 29(2):129–143
Li P, Froese TM, Brager G (2018) Post-occupancy evaluation: state-of-the-art analysis and state-of-the-practice review. Build Environ 133:187–202
MacNaughton P, Pegues J, Satish U, Santanam S, Spengler J, Allen J (2015) Economic, environmental and health implications of enhanced ventilation in office buildings. Int J Environ Res Public Health 12(11):14709–14722
Meir IA, Garb Y, Jiao D, Cicelsky A (2009) Post-occupancy evaluation: an inevitable step toward sustainability. Adv Build Energy Res 3(1):189–219
Newsham G, Birt B, Arsenault C, Thompson L, Veitch J, Mancini S, Galasiu A, Gover B, Macdonald I, Burns G (2012) Do green buildings outperform conventional buildings. In: Indoor environment and energy performance in North American offices
Riley M, Kokkarinen N, Pitt M (2010) Assessing post occupancy evaluation in higher education facilities. J Facilities Manage
Tham KW (2016) Indoor air quality and its effects on humans—a review of challenges and developments in the last 30 years. Energy Build 130:637–650
Yu Z, Fung BCM, Haghighat F, Yoshino H, Morofsky E (2011) A systematic procedure to study the influence of occupant behavior on building energy consumption. Energy Build 43(6):1409–1417
Zagreus L, Huizenga C, Arens E, Lehrer D (2004) Listening to the occupants: a web-based indoor environmental quality survey. Indoor Air 14(Suppl 8):65–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2004.00301.x
Zhang Y, Bai X, Mills FP, Pezzey JCV (2018) Rethinking the role of occupant behavior in building energy performance: a review. Energy Build 172:279–294
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Rochester Institute of Technology Office of Sponsored Research for the seed funding that supported this work. The authors would also like to thank the study participants and individuals that provided feedback on the survey questionnaire.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Canadian Society for Civil Engineering
About this paper
Cite this paper
Abraham, Y., Spaan, M. (2023). Evaluating Occupant Feedback on Indoor Environmental Quality in Educational Environments. In: Walbridge, S., et al. Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conference 2021. CSCE 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 247. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0968-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0968-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-0967-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-0968-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)