Skip to main content

Evaluating Occupant Feedback on Indoor Environmental Quality in Educational Environments

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conference 2021 (CSCE 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 247))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 718 Accesses

Abstract

Buildings play a significant role toward meeting ambitious energy and emissions reduction targets by improving energy efficiency and enhancing indoor environmental quality (IEQ). Studies have indicated that good IEQ can enhance occupants' health, wellbeing, and productivity. Occupant feedback surveys are beneficial for gathering end-user perceptions and determining occupant requirements for efficient building operations and management. Identifying gaps in building performance provides opportunities to ensure that occupant IEQ needs are better addressed during the operations phase. This paper presents the results of occupant feedback surveys administered at an educational institution in the US. The 435 survey responses were analyzed to draw out the key findings in relation to the IEQ, occupant behavior, and occupant satisfaction. From the survey responses relating to temperature preferences, 65.5% of the participants indicated that they preferred temperatures between 20 °C (68 °F) and 21.67 °C (71 °F) in the winter. Overall, 48.1% were moderately dissatisfied, dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied with the thermal conditions in their office. The source of discomfort for most occupants was the inability to control the temperature since the thermostat was inaccessible or controlled by others. Occupant mean satisfaction with other IEQ parameters (i.e., lighting, air quality, and noise) are discussed. This paper also elucidates the critical factors from the occupant feedback surveys pertaining to IEQ in their work environments. It provides recommendations to improve IEQ and occupant satisfaction during the operations phase. Effective communication between the end-user and the building operations and maintenance department can potentially improve occupant satisfaction and lower energy consumption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abraham Y, Zhao Z, Anumba C, Asadi S (2017) Implementation of a preference monitoring application for office building occupants. In: Lean and computing in construction congress, Heraklion, Greece

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abraham Y (2018) Integrating occupant values and preferences with building systems in conditioned environments. Ph.D., Pennsylvania State University

    Google Scholar 

  3. Abraham YS, Anumba CJ, Asadi S (2017) Data sensing approaches to monitoring building energy use and occupant behavior. In: Computing in civil engineering 2017, pp 239–247

    Google Scholar 

  4. ASHRAE/ANSI (2013) ASHRAE/ANSI Standard 55-2013 Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Atlanta, GA

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bland JM, Altman DG (1997) Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ 314(7080):572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brick JM, Kalton G (1996) Handling missing data in survey research. Stat Methods Med Res 5(3):215–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Delgoshaei P, Heidarinejad M, Xu K, Wentz JR, Delgoshaei P, Srebric J (2017) Impacts of building operational schedules and occupants on the lighting energy consumption patterns of an office space

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fisk WJ, Black D, Brunner G (2012) Changing ventilation rates in US offices: implications for health, work performance, energy, and associated economics. Build Environ 47:368–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fisk W, Seppanen O (2007) Providing better indoor environmental quality brings economic benefits

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gilani S, O’Brien W (2018) A preliminary study of occupants’ use of manual lighting controls in private offices: a case study. Energy Build 159:572–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Heydarian A, Pantazis E, Carneiro JP, Gerber D, Becerik-Gerber B (2016) Lights, building, action: impact of default lighting settings on occupant behaviour. J Environ Psychol 48:212–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hong T, Lin H-W (2013) Occupant behavior: impact on energy use of private offices. Lawrence Berkeley National Lab (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hong T, Taylor-Lange SC, D’Oca S, Yan D, Corgnati SP (2016) Advances in research and applications of energy-related occupant behavior in buildings. Energy Build 116:694–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hong T, Yan D, D’Oca S, Chen C-F (2017) Ten questions concerning occupant behavior in buildings: the big picture. Build Environ 114:518–530

    Google Scholar 

  15. Huizenga C, Abbaszadeh S, Zagreus L, Arens EA (2006) Air quality and thermal comfort in office buildings: results of a large indoor environmental quality survey. Proc Healthy Build 2006(3):393–397

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kavulya G, Becerik-Gerber B (2012) Understanding the influence of occupant behavior on energy consumption patterns in commercial buildings. In: Computing in civil engineering, pp 569–576

    Google Scholar 

  17. Leaman A, Bordass B (2001) Assessing building performance in use 4: the probe occupant surveys and their implications. Build Res Inf 29(2):129–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li P, Froese TM, Brager G (2018) Post-occupancy evaluation: state-of-the-art analysis and state-of-the-practice review. Build Environ 133:187–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. MacNaughton P, Pegues J, Satish U, Santanam S, Spengler J, Allen J (2015) Economic, environmental and health implications of enhanced ventilation in office buildings. Int J Environ Res Public Health 12(11):14709–14722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Meir IA, Garb Y, Jiao D, Cicelsky A (2009) Post-occupancy evaluation: an inevitable step toward sustainability. Adv Build Energy Res 3(1):189–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Newsham G, Birt B, Arsenault C, Thompson L, Veitch J, Mancini S, Galasiu A, Gover B, Macdonald I, Burns G (2012) Do green buildings outperform conventional buildings. In: Indoor environment and energy performance in North American offices

    Google Scholar 

  22. Riley M, Kokkarinen N, Pitt M (2010) Assessing post occupancy evaluation in higher education facilities. J Facilities Manage

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tham KW (2016) Indoor air quality and its effects on humans—a review of challenges and developments in the last 30 years. Energy Build 130:637–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yu Z, Fung BCM, Haghighat F, Yoshino H, Morofsky E (2011) A systematic procedure to study the influence of occupant behavior on building energy consumption. Energy Build 43(6):1409–1417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zagreus L, Huizenga C, Arens E, Lehrer D (2004) Listening to the occupants: a web-based indoor environmental quality survey. Indoor Air 14(Suppl 8):65–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2004.00301.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang Y, Bai X, Mills FP, Pezzey JCV (2018) Rethinking the role of occupant behavior in building energy performance: a review. Energy Build 172:279–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Rochester Institute of Technology Office of Sponsored Research for the seed funding that supported this work. The authors would also like to thank the study participants and individuals that provided feedback on the survey questionnaire.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. Abraham .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Canadian Society for Civil Engineering

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Abraham, Y., Spaan, M. (2023). Evaluating Occupant Feedback on Indoor Environmental Quality in Educational Environments. In: Walbridge, S., et al. Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conference 2021. CSCE 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 247. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0968-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0968-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-0967-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-0968-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics