Abstract
Simulation models have proven efficient in understanding and analysing the different characteristics of joining by the electromagnetic forming process. This work performs a comparative study between two different non-coupled multi-step simulation models to predict the pull-out strength of a smooth-surfaced Cu-SS tube-to tube joint joined by electromagnetic crimping. The first simulation model is performed in two steps using LS-Dyna ™, whereas the second simulation is performed in two steps using Ansys Maxwell and Ansys explicit dynamics. The result indicates a 5% higher pull-out strength in the first simulation than the second simulation. Pull-out strength values and failure modes are further validated with experimental results.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Psyk V, Risch D, Kinsey B, Tekkaya A, Kleiner M (2011) Electromagnetic forming—a review. J Mater Process Technol 21:787–829
Kapil A, Sharma A (2015) Magnetic pulse welding: an efficient and environmentally friendly multi-material joining technique. J Cleaner Prod 100(1):35–58
Faes K, Waele WD, Müller M, Cramer H (2014) Design of electromagnetic pulse crimp torque joints. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on high sped forming ICHSF 2014, Daejon, Korea, pp 39–50
Kumar D, Kore SD, Nandy A (2021) Interference-fit joining of Cu-SS composite tubes by electromagnetic crimping for different surface profiles. Weld World. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-021-01081-8
Kumar D, Kore SD, Nandy A (2020) Finite element modeling of electromagnetic crimping of Cu-SS tube-to-tube joint along with simulation of destructive testing for strength prediction of the joint. ASME J Manuf Sci Eng 143(4):041004. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4048431
Kumar D, Kore SD, Nandy A (2021) Experimental investigation of Cu-SS electromagnetically assisted adhesive tube-to-tube joining: Its advantages over electromagnetic crimping. Int J Adhesion Adhesives 109:102908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.102908
Pawar SH, Ray D, Kore SD, Nandy A (2020) Electromagnetic forming and perforation of tubes: modeling, simulation and validation. ASME J Manuf Sci Eng 143. https://doi.org/10.1115/14049090
Kumar D, Pawar S, Kore SD, Nandy A (2020) Comparison of coupled and non-coupled finite element models for joining of Cu-SS tubes by electromagnetic forming. Procedia Manuf 47:673–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.208
Oliveira I (2013) Electromagnetic forming process: numerical modelling and analysis of process parameters. Departamento De Engenharia Mecânica
Haiping YU, Li C, Zhao Z, Li Z (2005) Effect of field shaper on magnetic pressure in electromagnetic forming. J Mater Process Technol 168:245–249
Pawar S, Kore SD (2019) Electromagnetic forming and perforation of Al tubes. J Mech Sci Technol 33:5999–6007
Kumar D, Kore SD, Nandy A (2021) Finite element modelling of electromagnetic crimping of copper-stainless steel tube-to-tube joint. In: Pandey K, Misra R, Patowari P, Dixit U (eds) Recent advances in mechanical engineering. Lecture notes in mechanical engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7711-6_11
Shafeeque ES, Kumar D, Kore SD, Nandy A (2021) Finite element modelling of electromagnetic crimping on threaded surface. AIP Conf Proc 2408:020001. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0072619
Maria C (2009) Technology of EHIS (stamping) applied to production of automotive parts. Saint-Petersburg State Polytechnical University, Department of Applied Mathematics, Saint Petersburg
Eric AS, Steven, JH (2008) The use of LS-DYNA® models to predict containment of disk burst fragments 10th international LS-DYNA® Users Conference, MI
ASTM International (2016) E8/E8M-16a standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. In: ASM international, West Conshohocken, PA
Kleiner M, Marré M, Beerwald C, Homberg W, Löhe D, Barreiro P, Schulze V (2006) Investigation of force-fit joints produced by electromagnetic tube compression. In: Annals of the German academic society for production engineering, WGP XIII, pp 227–230
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the SERB, DST, India, for supporting this research under Project (IMP/2019/000276) and for Research scholarship from MHRD, India.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kumar, D., Morajkar, C., Kore, S.D., Nandy, A. (2023). Comparison of Two Different Non-coupled Multi-Step Simulation Techniques for Strength Prediction of an Electromagnetically Crimped Cu-SS Tube-To-Tube Joint with Smooth Interface. In: Chakrabarti, A., Suwas, S., Arora, M. (eds) Industry 4.0 and Advanced Manufacturing. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0561-2_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0561-2_28
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-0560-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-0561-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)