Skip to main content

Feasibility Verification of Multimodal Wearable Sensing System for Holistic Health Monitoring of Construction Workers

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conference 2021 (CSCE 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 239))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The unstructured nature of the labor-intensive construction industry negatively affects the health of workers. These challenges require a robust health monitoring approach to accurately monitor workers’ overall health status. Recent advancements in wearable technologies and physiological sensing have provided ample opportunities towards an objective and continuous in-field measurement of workers’ physical and mental status. However, these solutions have mostly focused on a particular health condition. There is a lack of holistic health monitoring to understand the impacts of the construction environment on workers’ health conditions (i.e., physical fatigue, mental stress, and exposure to heat stress). In this regard, the present study investigates the feasibility of a multimodal wearable sensing system to comprehensively monitor construction workers’ overall health status during their ongoing work. To this end, five able-bodied workers were prompted to perform specific construction activities (e.g., roofing, loading/unloading) with light and medium physical intensity while exposed to varying levels of heat stress (i.e., caution level, and danger level). During each task, three biosignals, namely photoplethysmography (PPG), electrodermal activity (EDA), and skin temperature (ST), and were collected from the workers through wearable biosensors. To assess their overall health status, various metrics were extracted from PPG (heart rate, heart rate variability), EDA (electrodermal level), and ST (mean skin temperature). Results of correlation analysis elucidated strong correlation between the extracted physiological metrics with respect to workers’ physical fatigue, mental stress, and heat stress exposure. The findings demonstrated the feasibility of a multimodal sensing system for the holistic health monitoring of construction workers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Acharya P, Boggess B, Zhang K (2018) Assessing heat stress and health among construction workers in a changing climate: a review. Int J Environ Res Public Health, MDPI AG 15(2)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Achten J, Jeukendrup AE (2003) Heart rate monitoring: applications and limitations. Sports Med

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ahn CR, Lee SH, Sun C, Jebelli H, Yang K, Choi B (2019) Wearable sensing technology applications in construction safety and health. J Constr Eng Manag Amer Soc Civil Eng (ASCE) 145(11)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Al-Bouwarthan M, Quinn MM, Kriebel D, Wegman DH (2019) Assessment of heat stress exposure among construction workers in the hot desert climate of Saudi Arabia. Ann Work Exposures Health Oxford Univ Press 63(5):505–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Allen J (2007) Photoplethysmography and its application in clinical physiological measurement. Physiol Measur

    Google Scholar 

  6. Aryal A, Ghahramani A, Becerik-Gerber B (2017) Monitoring fatigue in construction workers using physiological measurements. Autom Constr

    Google Scholar 

  7. Benedek M, Kaernbach C (2010) A continuous measure of phasic electrodermal activity. J Neurosci Methods 190(1):80–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bonauto D, Anderson R, Rauser E, Burke B (2007) Occupational heat illness in Washington State, 1995–2005. Am J Ind Med 50(12):940–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Borg GAV (1954) Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Plast Reconstr Surg 14(5):377–381

    Google Scholar 

  10. Boucsein W, Fowles DC, Grimnes S, Ben-Shakhar G, Roth WT, Dawson ME, Filion DL (2012) Publication recommendations for electrodermal measurements. Soc Psychiphysiol Res Ad hoc Comm Electrod Measur

    Google Scholar 

  11. Braithwaite JJ, Derrick D, Watson G, Jones R, Rowe M (2013) A guide for analysing electrodermal activity (EDA) & skin conductance responses (SCRs) for psychological experiments.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bureau of Labour (2018) National census of fatal occupational injuries summary

    Google Scholar 

  13. Choi B, Jebelli H, Lee S (2019a) Feasibility analysis of electrodermal activity (EDA) acquired from wearable sensors to assess construction workers’ perceived risk. Saf Sci Elsevier B.V. 115:110–120

    Google Scholar 

  14. Choi B, Jebelli H, Lee SH (2019b) Feasibility analysis of electrodermal activity (EDA) acquired from wearable sensors to assess construction workers’ perceived risk. Saf Sci, 115:110–120. Elsevier B.V.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Choi B, Lee G, Jebelli H, Lee S (2019c) Assessing workers perceived risk during construction task using a wristband-type Biosensor

    Google Scholar 

  16. Choi J-H, Loftness V (2012) Investigation of human body skin temperatures as a bio-signal to indicate overall thermal sensations

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cranston WI (1989) Thermoregulation and the skin, 213–221

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gatti UC, Schneider S, Migliaccio GC (2014) Physiological condition monitoring of construction workers. Autom Constr Elsevier 44:227–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. González-Muñoz EL, Gutiérrez-Martínez RE (2007) Contribution of mental workload to job stress in industrial workers. Work IOS Press 28(4):355–361

    Google Scholar 

  20. Guo H, Yu Y, Skitmore M (2017) Visualization technology-based construction safety management: a review. Autom Constr Elsevier B.V. 73:135–144

    Google Scholar 

  21. Habibi P, Dehghan H, Rezaei S, Maghsoudi K (2014) Physiological and perceptual heat strain responses in Iranian Veiled women under laboratory thermal Conditions. Iranian J Health Saf Environ

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hinze J, Godfrey R (2003) An evaluation of Safety performance measures for construction projects. J Constr Res World Scient Pub Co Pte Lt 04(01):5–15

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hwang S, Lee SH (2017) Wristband-type wearable health devices to measure construction workers’ physical demands. Autom Constr 83:330–340. Elsevier B.V.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hwang S, Seo JO, Jebelli H, Lee SH (2016) Feasibility analysis of heart rate monitoring of construction workers using a photoplethysmography (PPG) sensor embedded in a wristband-type activity tracker. Autom Const, 71(Part 2):372–381. Elsevier B.V.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jebelli H, Choi B, Kim H, Lee S (2018a) Feasibility study of a wristband-type wearable sensor to understand construction workers’ physical and mental status. Constr Res Congress 2018 Amer Soc Civil Eng (ASCE), 367–377

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jebelli H, Choi B, Lee S (2019a) Application of wearable biosensors to construction sites. II: assessing workers’ physical demand. J Constr Eng Manag Amer Soc Civil Eng (ASCE) 145(12):04019080

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jebelli H, Hwang S, Lee SH (2018b) EEG-based workers’ stress recognition at construction sites. Autom Const 93:315–324. Elsevier B.V.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jebelli H, Khalili MM, Lee S (2019b) Mobile EEG-based workers’ stress recognition by applying deep neural network. Adv Inform Comput Civil Constr Eng, Springer International Publishing, pp 173–180

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jebelli H, Lee S (2019) Feasibility of wearable electromyography (EMG) to assess construction workers’ muscle fatigue. Adv Inform Comput Civil Constr Eng, Springer International Publishing, pp 181–187

    Google Scholar 

  30. Johnstone JA, Ford PA, Hughes G, Watson T, Garrett AT (2012) BioharnessTM multivariable monitoring device. Part I: Validity. J Sports Sci Med 11(3):400–408

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kelsey M, Palumbo RV, Urbaneja A, Akcakaya M, Huang J, Kleckner IR, Barrett LF, Quigley KS, Sejdic E, Goodwin MS (2017) Artifact detection in electrodermal activity using sparse recovery. Compress Sens VI: From Diverse Modalities Big Data Analyt 10211:102110D

    Google Scholar 

  32. Laitinen H, Marjamäki M, Päivärinta K (1999) The validity of the TR safety observation method on building construction. Acci Anal Prevent Elsevier Ltd 31(5):463–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Langdon RR, Sawang S (2018) Construction workers’ well-being: what leads to depression, anxiety, and stress? J Const Eng Manag. Amer Soc Civil Eng (ASCE) 144(2):04017100

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lee G, Choi B, Jebelli H, Ahn CR, Lee S (2019) Reference signal-based method to remove respiration noise in electrodermal activity (EDA) collected from the field. Amer Soc Civil Eng (ASCE), 17–25

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ojha A, Shakerian S, Habibnezhad M, Jebelli H, LeeS. Fardhosseini MS (2020) Feasibility of using physiological signals from a wearable biosensor to monitor dehydration of construction workers. Periodica Polytechnica Budapest University of Technology and Economics, pp 20–28

    Google Scholar 

  36. Petersen JS, Zwerling C (1998) Comparison of health outcomes among older construction and blue-collar employees in the United States. Amer J Industr Med Am J Ind Med 34(3):280–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Poh M-Z, Swenson NC, Picard RW (2010) A wearable sensor for unobtrusive, long-term assessment of electrodermal activity. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 57(5):1243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sveikauskas L, Rowe S, Mildenberger JD, Price J, Young A (2018) Measuring productivity growth in construction. Monthly Labor Rev US Bureau Labor Stat 2018(1):1–34

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sweeney KT, Ward TE, McLoone SF (2012) Artifact removal in physiological signals-practices and possibilities. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 16(3):488–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Jebelli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Canadian Society for Civil Engineering

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ojha, A., Shakerian, S., Habibnezhad, M., Jebelli, H. (2023). Feasibility Verification of Multimodal Wearable Sensing System for Holistic Health Monitoring of Construction Workers. In: Walbridge, S., et al. Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conference 2021 . CSCE 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 239. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0503-2_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0503-2_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-0502-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-0503-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics