Skip to main content

SmarteR Approach for the Mapping of Invasive Plant Species

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Forest Dynamics and Conservation

Abstract

Invasive species distribution has caught global attention due to its detrimental effects on biodiversity. Species that have become invasive often come from climatic conditions similar to those found in other parts of the world. Species distribution modelling (SDM), also referred to as habitat suitability mapping, ecological niche modelling, or climate envelope modelling can be used to map potential sites of invasion probability. Some of the major SDM techniques that fall under this category are the Bioclim model, Domain model, and Maxent model. A more sophisticated set of R tools has made it simpler to estimate a species’ habitat range based on its geolocation. For SDMs to be successful, it must be possible to accurately describe the distribution of the species in question. Based on climate data and other environmental criteria such as elevation, surface water, soil moisture, and land use as well as other human-induced variables, SDMs attempt to map anticipated species distributions or habitat suitability. We describe here two major approaches of classical SDM and machine learning techniques for mapping invasion. Machine learning comprises algorithms that do not rely on rule-based programming; instead, it learns from the data. It is increasingly being used to build predictive habitat suitability maps using binary response data and environmental predictors. Various models that utilize machine learning include Generalized linear model (GLM), Support vector machines (SVM), Gradient boosting machine (GBM), k-nearest neighbor (kNN), and Random Forest (RF). This chapter will discuss various modelling techniques with practical examples along with model evaluation using R language and platform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://poldham.github.io/abs/gbif.html

  2. 2.

    https://www.inaturalist.org/

  3. 3.

    https://srtm.csi.cgiar.org/srtmdata/

  4. 4.

    http://www.diva-gis.org/Data

  5. 5.

    http://www.esa-landcover-cci.org/

  6. 6.

    https://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu

  7. 7.

    https://www.worldclim.org

References

  • Adhikari D, Tiwary R, Barik SK (2015) Modelling hotspots for invasive alien plants in India. PLoS One 10:e0134665

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barry S, Elith J (2006) Error and uncertainty in habitat models. J Appl Ecol 43:413–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertelsmeier C, Luque GM, Courchamp F (2013) Increase in quantity and quality of suitable areas for invasive species as climate changes. Conserv Biol 27:1458–1467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Booth TH, Nix HA, Busby JR, Hutchinson MF (2014) BIOCLIM: the first species distribution modelling package, its early applications and relevance to most current MAXENT studies. Divers Distrib 20:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhury MR, Deb P, Singha H et al (2016) Predicting the probable distribution and threat of invasive Mimosa diplotricha Suavalle and Mikania micrantha Kunth in a protected tropical grassland. Ecol Eng 97:23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutler DR, Edwards TC Jr, Beard KH et al (2007) Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology 88:2783–2792

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Siqueira MF, Durigan G, de Marco JP, Peterson AT (2009) Something from nothing: using landscape similarity and ecological niche modeling to find rare plant species. J Nat Conserv 17:25–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Early R, Bradley BA, Dukes JS et al (2016) Global threats from invasive alien species in the twenty-first century and national response capacities. Nat Commun 7:1–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elith J, Leathwick JR, Hastie T (2008) A working guide to boosted regression trees. J Anim Ecol 77:802–813

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elith J, Phillips SJ, Hastie T et al (2011) A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Divers Distrib 17:43–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans JS, Cushman SA (2009) Gradient modeling of conifer species using random forests. Landsc Ecol 24:673–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman J (2001) Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann Stat 29:1189–1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillera-Arroita G (2017) Modelling of species distributions, range dynamics and communities under imperfect detection: advances, challenges and opportunities. Ecography (Cop) 40:281–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillera-Arroita G, Lahoz-Monfort JJ, Elith J et al (2015) Is my species distribution model fit for purpose? Matching data and models to applications. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 24:276–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guisan A, Edwards TC Jr, Hastie T (2002) Generalized linear and generalized additive models in studies of species distributions: setting the scene. Ecol Model 157:89–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo Q, Kelly M, Graham CH (2005) Support vector machines for predicting distribution of sudden oak death in California. Ecol Model 182:75–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollings T, Robinson A, van Andel M et al (2017) Species distribution models: a comparison of statistical approaches for livestock and disease epidemics. PLoS One 12:e0183626

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jongman E, Jongman SRRHG (1995) Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Cambridge university press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Karatzoglou A, Meyer D, Hornik K (2006) Support vector machines in R. J Stat Softw 15:1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar M, Singh H, Padalia H (2020) Remote sensing for mapping invasive alien plants: opportunities and challenges. In: A handbook on invasive species. Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education, Dehradun, pp 16–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Oduor AMO, Zhang Z et al (2017) Do invasive alien plants benefit more from global environmental change than native plants? Glob Chang Biol 23:3363–3370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin WK (1996) The current and potential distribution of the common myna Acridotheres tristis in Australia. Emu 96:166–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls AO (1989) How to make biological surveys go further with generalised linear models. Biol Conserv 50:51–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell MS, Ignizio DA (2012) Bioclimatic predictors for supporting ecological applications in the conterminous United States. US Geol Surv Data Ser 691:4–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Padalia H, Bahuguna U (2017) Spatial modelling of congruence of native biodiversity and potential hotspots of forest invasive species (FIS) in central Indian landscape. J Nat Conserv 36:29–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padalia H, Srivastava V, Kushwaha SPS (2014) Modeling potential invasion range of alien invasive species, Hyptis suaveolens (L.) Poit. in India: comparison of MaxEnt and GARP. Ecol Inform 22:36–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padalia H, Srivastava V, Kushwaha SPS (2015) How climate change might influence the potential distribution of weed, bushmint (Hyptis suaveolens)? Environ Monit Assess 187:1–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Panda RM, Behera MD, Roy PS (2018) Assessing distributions of two invasive species of contrasting habits in future climate. J Environ Manag 213:478–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson AT (2006) Uses and requirements of ecological niche models and related distributional models. Biodivers Inform 3:59–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model 190:231–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam HR (2000) On the relationship between niche and distribution. Ecol Lett 3:349–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Recknagel F (2001) Applications of machine learning to ecological modelling. Ecol Model 146:303–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM, Pyšek P (2008) Fifty years of invasion ecology – the legacy of Charles Elton. Divers Distrib 14:161–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00464.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha UB, Shrestha BB (2019) Climate change amplifies plant invasion hotspots in Nepal. Divers Distrib 25:1599–1612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava V, Griess VC, Padalia H (2018) Mapping invasion potential using ensemble modelling. A case study on Yushania maling in the Darjeeling Himalayas. Ecol Model 385:35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg D, Colla P (2009) CART: classification and regression trees. top ten algorithms data Min 9:179

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockwell D (1999) The GARP modelling system: problems and solutions to automated spatial prediction. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 13:143–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiedeken EJ, Stout JC (2015) Insect-flower interaction network structure is resilient to a temporary pulse of floral resources from invasive Rhododendron ponticum. PLoS One 10:e0119733

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Urban MC, Bocedi G, Hendry AP et al (2016) Improving the forecast for biodiversity under climate change. Science 80:353

    Google Scholar 

  • Vapnik V (1998) The support vector method of function estimation. In: Nonlinear modeling. Springer, pp 55–85

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • VilĂ  M, Espinar JL, Hejda M et al (2011) Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecol Lett 14:702–708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zurell D (2017) Integrating demography, dispersal and interspecific interactions into bird distribution models. J Avian Biol 48:1505–1516

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kala, A.K., Mukhopadhyay, S., Paygude, A. (2022). SmarteR Approach for the Mapping of Invasive Plant Species. In: Kumar, M., Dhyani, S., Kalra, N. (eds) Forest Dynamics and Conservation. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0071-6_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics