Abstract
Invasive species distribution has caught global attention due to its detrimental effects on biodiversity. Species that have become invasive often come from climatic conditions similar to those found in other parts of the world. Species distribution modelling (SDM), also referred to as habitat suitability mapping, ecological niche modelling, or climate envelope modelling can be used to map potential sites of invasion probability. Some of the major SDM techniques that fall under this category are the Bioclim model, Domain model, and Maxent model. A more sophisticated set of R tools has made it simpler to estimate a species’ habitat range based on its geolocation. For SDMs to be successful, it must be possible to accurately describe the distribution of the species in question. Based on climate data and other environmental criteria such as elevation, surface water, soil moisture, and land use as well as other human-induced variables, SDMs attempt to map anticipated species distributions or habitat suitability. We describe here two major approaches of classical SDM and machine learning techniques for mapping invasion. Machine learning comprises algorithms that do not rely on rule-based programming; instead, it learns from the data. It is increasingly being used to build predictive habitat suitability maps using binary response data and environmental predictors. Various models that utilize machine learning include Generalized linear model (GLM), Support vector machines (SVM), Gradient boosting machine (GBM), k-nearest neighbor (kNN), and Random Forest (RF). This chapter will discuss various modelling techniques with practical examples along with model evaluation using R language and platform.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adhikari D, Tiwary R, Barik SK (2015) Modelling hotspots for invasive alien plants in India. PLoS One 10:e0134665
Barry S, Elith J (2006) Error and uncertainty in habitat models. J Appl Ecol 43:413–423
Bertelsmeier C, Luque GM, Courchamp F (2013) Increase in quantity and quality of suitable areas for invasive species as climate changes. Conserv Biol 27:1458–1467
Booth TH, Nix HA, Busby JR, Hutchinson MF (2014) BIOCLIM: the first species distribution modelling package, its early applications and relevance to most current MAXENT studies. Divers Distrib 20:1–9
Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32
Choudhury MR, Deb P, Singha H et al (2016) Predicting the probable distribution and threat of invasive Mimosa diplotricha Suavalle and Mikania micrantha Kunth in a protected tropical grassland. Ecol Eng 97:23–31
Cutler DR, Edwards TC Jr, Beard KH et al (2007) Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology 88:2783–2792
de Siqueira MF, Durigan G, de Marco JP, Peterson AT (2009) Something from nothing: using landscape similarity and ecological niche modeling to find rare plant species. J Nat Conserv 17:25–32
Early R, Bradley BA, Dukes JS et al (2016) Global threats from invasive alien species in the twenty-first century and national response capacities. Nat Commun 7:1–9
Elith J, Leathwick JR, Hastie T (2008) A working guide to boosted regression trees. J Anim Ecol 77:802–813
Elith J, Phillips SJ, Hastie T et al (2011) A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Divers Distrib 17:43–57
Evans JS, Cushman SA (2009) Gradient modeling of conifer species using random forests. Landsc Ecol 24:673–683
Friedman J (2001) Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann Stat 29:1189–1232
Guillera-Arroita G (2017) Modelling of species distributions, range dynamics and communities under imperfect detection: advances, challenges and opportunities. Ecography (Cop) 40:281–295
Guillera-Arroita G, Lahoz-Monfort JJ, Elith J et al (2015) Is my species distribution model fit for purpose? Matching data and models to applications. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 24:276–292
Guisan A, Edwards TC Jr, Hastie T (2002) Generalized linear and generalized additive models in studies of species distributions: setting the scene. Ecol Model 157:89–100
Guo Q, Kelly M, Graham CH (2005) Support vector machines for predicting distribution of sudden oak death in California. Ecol Model 182:75–90
Hollings T, Robinson A, van Andel M et al (2017) Species distribution models: a comparison of statistical approaches for livestock and disease epidemics. PLoS One 12:e0183626
Jongman E, Jongman SRRHG (1995) Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Cambridge university press
Karatzoglou A, Meyer D, Hornik K (2006) Support vector machines in R. J Stat Softw 15:1–28
Kumar M, Singh H, Padalia H (2020) Remote sensing for mapping invasive alien plants: opportunities and challenges. In: A handbook on invasive species. Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education, Dehradun, pp 16–31
Liu Y, Oduor AMO, Zhang Z et al (2017) Do invasive alien plants benefit more from global environmental change than native plants? Glob Chang Biol 23:3363–3370
Martin WK (1996) The current and potential distribution of the common myna Acridotheres tristis in Australia. Emu 96:166–173
Nicholls AO (1989) How to make biological surveys go further with generalised linear models. Biol Conserv 50:51–75
O’Donnell MS, Ignizio DA (2012) Bioclimatic predictors for supporting ecological applications in the conterminous United States. US Geol Surv Data Ser 691:4–9
Padalia H, Bahuguna U (2017) Spatial modelling of congruence of native biodiversity and potential hotspots of forest invasive species (FIS) in central Indian landscape. J Nat Conserv 36:29–37
Padalia H, Srivastava V, Kushwaha SPS (2014) Modeling potential invasion range of alien invasive species, Hyptis suaveolens (L.) Poit. in India: comparison of MaxEnt and GARP. Ecol Inform 22:36–43
Padalia H, Srivastava V, Kushwaha SPS (2015) How climate change might influence the potential distribution of weed, bushmint (Hyptis suaveolens)? Environ Monit Assess 187:1–14
Panda RM, Behera MD, Roy PS (2018) Assessing distributions of two invasive species of contrasting habits in future climate. J Environ Manag 213:478–488
Peterson AT (2006) Uses and requirements of ecological niche models and related distributional models. Biodivers Inform 3:59–72
Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model 190:231–259
Pulliam HR (2000) On the relationship between niche and distribution. Ecol Lett 3:349–361
Recknagel F (2001) Applications of machine learning to ecological modelling. Ecol Model 146:303–310
Richardson DM, Pyšek P (2008) Fifty years of invasion ecology – the legacy of Charles Elton. Divers Distrib 14:161–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00464.x
Shrestha UB, Shrestha BB (2019) Climate change amplifies plant invasion hotspots in Nepal. Divers Distrib 25:1599–1612
Srivastava V, Griess VC, Padalia H (2018) Mapping invasion potential using ensemble modelling. A case study on Yushania maling in the Darjeeling Himalayas. Ecol Model 385:35–44
Steinberg D, Colla P (2009) CART: classification and regression trees. top ten algorithms data Min 9:179
Stockwell D (1999) The GARP modelling system: problems and solutions to automated spatial prediction. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 13:143–158
Tiedeken EJ, Stout JC (2015) Insect-flower interaction network structure is resilient to a temporary pulse of floral resources from invasive Rhododendron ponticum. PLoS One 10:e0119733
Urban MC, Bocedi G, Hendry AP et al (2016) Improving the forecast for biodiversity under climate change. Science 80:353
Vapnik V (1998) The support vector method of function estimation. In: Nonlinear modeling. Springer, pp 55–85
Vilà M, Espinar JL, Hejda M et al (2011) Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecol Lett 14:702–708
Zurell D (2017) Integrating demography, dispersal and interspecific interactions into bird distribution models. J Avian Biol 48:1505–1516
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kala, A.K., Mukhopadhyay, S., Paygude, A. (2022). SmarteR Approach for the Mapping of Invasive Plant Species. In: Kumar, M., Dhyani, S., Kalra, N. (eds) Forest Dynamics and Conservation. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0071-6_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0071-6_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-0070-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-0071-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)