Skip to main content

Laparoscopic Major Hepatectomy and Parenchymal-Sparing Anatomical Hepatectomy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The IASGO Textbook of Multi-Disciplinary Management of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Diseases

Abstract

Although laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has become recognized as the standard treatment worldwide, laparoscopic major hepatectomy (LMH) has yet to become widespread. LMH was first defined as resection of 3 or more segments or the difficult posterosuperior segments (4a, 7, 8) in 2008. Although the definition is still under debate and is not clearly defined, several studies reported that LMH was associated with less blood loss, shorter hospital stays and fewer complications compared with open surgery. According to a nationwide survey of Japanese National Clinical Database, advanced LLR increased from 3.3% of all resections in 2011 to 10.8% in 2017, with its mortality 3.6% in 2011, and 1.0% in 2017. The IWATE criteria can be used to predict the difficulty of LLR from preoperative variables and to appropriately select patients according to the surgeons’ skill level. The learning curve for LMH has been discussed, but conclusive number of cases for the mastery of LMH cannot be decided with variety of studies. Since laparoscopic parenchymal-sparing anatomical liver hepatectomy (Lap-PSAH = segmentectomies and sub-segmentectomies) shares some surgical techniques with LMH, it may help shorten the learning curve of LMH. In conclusion, LMH still remains technically demanding, but it has been gradually developed with the improvement of surgical techniques and the careful expansion of indications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Buell JF, Kaneko H, Han HS, et al. Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg. 2015;261(4):619–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dagher I, O’Rourke N, Geller DA, Cherqui D, Belli G, Gamblin TC, et al. Laparoscopic major hepatectomy: an evolution in standard of care. Ann Surg. 2009;250(5):856–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Reich H, McGlynn F, DeCaprio J, Budin R. Laparoscopic excision of benign liver lesions. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;78(5 Pt 2):956–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O’Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I, et al. The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville statement, 2008. Ann Surg. 2009;250(5):825–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ban D, Tanabe M, Ito H, Otsuka Y, Nitta H, Abe Y, et al. A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014;21(10):745–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wakabayashi G. What has changed after the Morioka consensus conference 2014 on laparoscopic liver resection? Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2016;5(4):281–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Han HS, Kaneko H, Buell JF. Laparoscopic hepatectomy is theoretically better than open hepatectomy: preparing for the 2nd international consensus conference on laparoscopic liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014;21(10):723–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ban D, Tanabe M, Kumamaru H, Nitta H, Otsuka Y, Miyata H, et al. Safe dissemination of laparoscopic liver resection in 27, 146 cases between 2011 and 2017 from the National Clinical Database of Japan. Ann Surg. 2020;274(6):1043–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Strasberg SM. Nomenclature of hepatic anatomy and resections: a review of the Brisbane 2000 system. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Surg. 2005;12(5):351–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Di Fabio F, Samim M, Di Gioia P, Godeseth R, Pearce NW, Abu HM. Laparoscopic major hepatectomies: clinical outcomes and classification. World J Surg. 2014;38(12):3169–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Reddy SK, Barbas AS, Turley RS, Steel JL, Tsung A, Marsh JW, et al. A standard definition of major hepatectomy: resection of four or more liver segments. HPB (Oxford). 2011;13(7):494–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheek SM, Sucandy I, Tsung A, Marsh JW, Geller DA. Evidence supporting laparoscopic major hepatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2016;23(5):257–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brown KM, Geller DA. What is the learning curve for laparoscopic major hepatectomy? J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20(5):1065–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Takahara T, Wakabayashi G, Konno H, Gotoh M, Yamaue H, Yanaga K, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic major hepatectomy with propensity score matched open cases from the National Clinical Database in Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2016;23(11):721–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen K, Pan Y, Hu GY, Maher H, Zheng XY, Yan JF. Laparoscopic versus open major hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2018;28(5):267–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang ZY, Chen QL, Sun LL, He SP, Luo XF, Huang LS, et al. Laparoscopic versus open major liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative cohort studies. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):1047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Makuuchi M, Hasegawa H, Yamazaki S. Ultrasonically guided subsegmentectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1985;161(4):346–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Takasaki K, Kobayashi S, Tanaka S, Saito A, Yamamoto M, Hanyu F. Highly anatomically systematized hepatic resection with Glissonean sheath code transection at the hepatic hilus. Int Surg. 1990;75(2):73–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hasegawa K, Kokudo N, Imamura H, Matsuyama Y, Aoki T, Minagawa M, et al. Prognostic impact of anatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2005;242(2):252–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhao H, Chen C, Gu S, Yan X, Jia W, Mao L, et al. Anatomical versus non-anatomical resection for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma without macroscopic vascular invasion: a propensity score matching analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;32(4):870–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cho JY, Han HS, Choi Y, Yoon YS, Kim S, Choi JK, et al. Association of remnant liver ischemia with early recurrence and poor survival after liver resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(4):386–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Berardi G, Igarashi K, Li CJ, Ozaki T, Mishima K, Nakajima K, et al. Parenchymal sparing anatomical liver resections with full laparoscopic approach: description of technique and short-term results. Ann Surg. 2019;273(4):785–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Takasaki K. Glissonean pedicle transection method for hepatic resection: a new concept of liver segmentation. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Surg. 1998;5(3):286–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hüscher CG, Lirici MM, Chiodini S. Laparoscopic liver resections. Semin Laparosc Surg. 1998;5(3):204–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sugioka A, Kato Y, Tanahashi Y. Systematic extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle isolation for anatomical liver resection based on Laennec's capsule: proposal of a novel comprehensive surgical anatomy of the liver. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2017;24(1):17–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement

The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Go Wakabayashi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mishima, K., Wakabayashi, G., Igarashi, K., Ozaki, T. (2022). Laparoscopic Major Hepatectomy and Parenchymal-Sparing Anatomical Hepatectomy. In: Makuuchi, M., et al. The IASGO Textbook of Multi-Disciplinary Management of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Diseases. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0063-1_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0063-1_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-0062-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-0063-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics