Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Consideration of Organization Model Based on Dynamic Equilibrium Theory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Systems Research II

Part of the book series: Translational Systems Sciences ((TSS,volume 27))

  • 153 Accesses

Abstract

The external environment of firms is constantly changing. To adapt to change, they are required to continue to change their internal environment. In this chapter, the author considers the coordination mechanisms existing in constitutive elements of business organizations, applying the concept of Dynamic Equilibrium Theory in the field of life science.

Inflexible mechanisms will not affect a short-term business performance, whereas will endanger a firm’s existence in the long term. To avoid such a risk, sophistication of coordination mechanisms should be highly required. This chapter also discusses measures to advance coordination mechanisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Escher, M. C. (1989) Escher on Escher: Exploring the infinite (Japanese-language, I. Sakane (1994), Trans., Asahi Shimbun Publications Inc).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuoka, S. (2007). Dynamic equilibrium. Kirakusha Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuoka, S. (2009). Between organic matters and inorganic matters. Kodansha Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuoka, S. (2011). Dynamic equilibrium 2. Kirakusha Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuoka, S. (2017). Dynamic equilibrium 3. Kirakusha Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallier, J. H. (1986). Logic for computer science: Foundations of automatic theorem proving. Harper & Row Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galliers, R. D. (1991). Choosing appropriate information systems research approaches. In H.-E. Nissen et al. (Eds.), Information systems research (pp. 327–345). North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galliers, R. D., & Land, F. F. (1987). Choosing appropriate information systems research methodologies. Communications of the ACM, 30(11), 900–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, N., & Troitzsch, K. (2005). Simulation for the social scientist (2nd ed.). Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, V., et al. (2005). Pattern-oriented modeling of agent-based complex systems: Lessons from ecology. Science, 310(11), 987–991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Forth generation evaluation. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, S., & Ives, B. (1982). MIS research strategies. Information & Management, 5, 339–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschheim, R., et al. (1995). Information systems development and data modeling. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y. (2011). A challenge and possibility on the theory of dynamic capability (Departmental Bulletin Paper, Vol. 3, pp. 29–42). Waseda University Graduate School of Commerce.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kueppers, G., & Lenhard, J. (2005). Validation of simulation: Patterns in the social and natural sciences. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 8(4), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, A. M. (2007). Simulation modeling and analysis (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A. S. (1991). Architecture as a reference discipline for MIS. In H.-E. Nissen et al. (Eds.), Information systems research (pp. 573–592). North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesarovic, M. D., & Takahara, Y. (1989). Abstract systems theory (Lecture notes in control and information sciences). Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J., & Stowell, F. (Eds.). (1997). Information systems: An emerging discipline? McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morone, P., & Taylor, R. (2010). Knowledge diffusion and innovation: Modelling complex entrepreneurial behaviours. Edward Elgar Publication Ltd.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, S. (2008). Alternative approaches to the empirical validation of agent-based models. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 11(1), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, T. H., & Finger, J. M. (1967). Verification of computer simulation model. Management Science, 14(2), B92–B101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes, N., Shrader-Frechette, K., & Belitz, K. (1994). Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences. Science, 263(4), 641–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otsuki, H. (2010). Organizational transformation and dynamism of organizational routines. The Waseda Commercial Review, 425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Railsback, S. F., & Grimm, V. (2019). Agent-based and individual-based modeling: A practical introduction, second edition. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richiardi, M., et al. (2006). A common protocol for agent-based social simulation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 9(1), 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargent, R. G. (2011). Verification and validation of simulation models. In S. Jain et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2011 Winter Simulation Conference (pp. 183–198). IEEE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shiba, N. (2019). The validity of agent-based models (in Japanese). In The 10th Conference of Transdisciplinary Federation of Science and Technology, F-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperschneider, V., & Antoniou, G. (1991). Logic: A foundation for computer science. Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, J., & Tesfatsion, L. (2007). Dynamic testing of wholesale power market designs: An open-source agent-based framework. Computational Economics, 30, 291–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takahara, Y., & Liu, Y. (2006). Foundations and applications of MIS: A model theory approach. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi, S., & Takahara, Y. (1995). Logical approach to systems theory (Lecture notes in control and information science). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and micro foundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1319–1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2012). Dynamic capabilities: Routines versus entrepreneurial action. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 1395–1401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2014). A dynamic capabilities-based entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 45, 8–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D. R., & Wetherbe, J. C. (1984). MIS research: A profile of leading journal and universities. Data Base, 16(3), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werker, C., & Brenner, T. (2014). Empirical calibration of simulation models. Papers on economic and evolution no. 0410. Max Planck Institute for Research into Economic Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windrum, P., Fagiolo, G., & Moneta, A. (2007). Empirical validation of agent-based models: Alternatives and prospects. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 10(2), 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeigler, B. P., Praehofer, H., & Kim, T. G. (2000). Theory of modeling and simulation (2nd ed.). Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Shizuoka University, Shizuoka, Shizuoka, Japan

    Hirolkazu Tanaka

Authors
  1. Hirolkazu Tanaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hirolkazu Tanaka .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business Management, Bandung Institute of Technology, Kawasaki, Japan

    Kyoichi Kijima

  2. School of Management, Tokyo University of Science, Tokyo, Japan

    Junichi Iijima

  3. School of Management, Tokyo University of Science, Tokyo, Japan

    Ryo Sato

  4. Faculty of Commerce and Economics, Chiba University of Commerce, Tokyo, Japan

    Hiroshi Deguchi

  5. Yokohama, Japan

    Bumpei Nakano

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tanaka, H. (2022). Consideration of Organization Model Based on Dynamic Equilibrium Theory. In: Kijima, K., Iijima, J., Sato, R., Deguchi, H., Nakano, B. (eds) Systems Research II. Translational Systems Sciences, vol 27. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9941-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation