Skip to main content

EEG-Based Evaluation of Classifying Attention States Between Single and Dual Tasks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
IRC-SET 2021

Abstract

Everyone in their daily lives, occasionally, needs to juggle more than one task simultaneously. Although performing these tasks sequentially, one at a time, would result in optimal task performance, it is inevitable to multitask. Under such multitasking scenarios, a mixture of different attention paradigms is required to achieve the best performance outcome. Earlier studies have mainly focused on investigating their subjects’ cognitive performance under dual tasks or single tasks separately. Not much research had been conducted comparing single tasks and dual tasks based on attention detection using electroencephalography (EEG). We designed an EEG experiment consisting three common cognitive tasks with single-tasking and dual-tasking paradigms to classify the attention levels of subjects. We collected data from twenty-five adolescents after seeking ethical approval and receiving parental consent. We used six bandpower features with machine learning and statistical analysis to evaluate attention detection performance among different task pairs. From our analysis, though there were less statistically significant differences between the mean p-value (p = 0.21) of accuracy between single tasks and dual tasks, it was also found that there was only 2% accuracy improvement obtained in dual tasks compared with respective single tasks in the subject-independent cross-validation of attention classification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Silsupadol, P., et al. (2009). Effects of single-task versus dual-task training on balance performance in older adults: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 90(3), 381–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2008.09.559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yap, J. Y., & Lim, S. W. H. (2013). Media multitasking predicts unitary versus splitting visual focal attention. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(7), 889–902. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.835315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lin, L., Cockerham, D., Chang, Z., & Natividad, G. (2015). Task speed and accuracy decrease when multitasking. Technology, Knowledge and Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lenartowicz, A., & Loo, S. K. (2014). Use of EEG to diagnose ADHD. Current Psychiatry Reports, 16, 498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-014-0498-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ahani, A., et al. (2014). Quantitative change of EEG and respiration signals during mindfulness meditation. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehab., 11(1), 87. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Niedermayer, E., & da Silva, F. L. (2005). Electroencephalography: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications, and Related Fields. 5th. Wolters Kluwer, [Google Scholar] A classical and comprehensive text, covering both basic and clinical aspects of EEG.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wai, A. A. P., Dou, M., & Guan, C. (2020). Generalizability of EEG-based mental attention modeling with multiple cognitive tasks. In: 42nd IEEE EMBC, pp. 2959–2962. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC44109.2020.9176346.

  8. Lim, C. G., et al. (2019). A randomized controlled trial of a brain-computer interface based attention training program for ADHD. PLoS ONE, 14(5), e0216225. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Adler, R., & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2014). The effects of task difficulty and multitasking on performance. Interacting With Computers, 27(4), 430–439. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwu005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. McDermott, T. J., et al. (2017). Spatiotemporal oscillatory dynamics of visual selective attention during a flanker task. NeuroImage, 156, 277–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jung, C. M., Ronda, J. M., Czeisler, C. A., & Wright, K. P., Jr. (2011). Comparison of sustained attention assessed by auditory and visual psychomotor vigilance tasks prior to and during sleep deprivation. Journal of Sleep Research, 20(2), 348–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2869.2010.00877.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lotte F. (2014) A tutorial on EEG signal-processing techniques for mental-state recognition in brain–Computer interfaces. In: Miranda, E., Castet, J. (eds) Guide to brain-computer music interfacing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6584-2_7

  13. Lotte, F., et al. (2018). A Review of Classification Algorithms for EEG-based Brain-Computer Interfaces: A 10-year Update. Journal of Neural Engineering, 15(3), 55. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/aab2f2ff.ffhal-01846433f

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chang, C. C., & Lin, C. J. (2011). LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. ACM Transaction Intelligent System Technology, 2(3), 27. https://doi.org/10.1145/1961189.1961199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Love, J. et al. (2019). JASP: Graphical statistical software for common statistical designs. Journal of Statistical Software, 88(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v088.i02

  16. JASP Team (2020). JASP (Version 0.14.1) [Computer software].

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gopher, D., Armony, L., & Greenspan, Y. (2000). Switching tasks and attention policies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 308–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hillel, I., Gazit, E., Nieuwboer, A., Avanzino, L., Rochester, L., & Cereatti, A. et al (2019). Is every-day walking in older adults more analogous to dual-task walking or to usual walking? Elucidating the gaps between gait performance in the lab and during 24/7 monitoring. European Review of Aging and Physical Activity, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s11556-019-0214-5p

  19. Meyer, D., & Kieras, D., (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychological Review, 104(4), 749–791.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Neural basis for brain responses to TV commercials: a high-resolution EEG study. IEEE Transactions in Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 16(6), 522–531.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wang Yuting .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Yuting, W., Yixuan, W., Ern, P.F.S., Wai, A.A.P. (2022). EEG-Based Evaluation of Classifying Attention States Between Single and Dual Tasks. In: Guo, H., Ren, H., Wang, V., Chekole, E.G., Lakshmanan, U. (eds) IRC-SET 2021. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9869-9_28

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics