Skip to main content

Deepfake Images, Videos Generation, and Detection Techniques Using Deep Learning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Machine Intelligence and Smart Systems

Part of the book series: Algorithms for Intelligent Systems ((AIS))

Abstract

Deep learning is utilized as a deepfake detection and creation method. Deepfake produces fake videos and images, which are difficult to distinguish between authentic images or videos. A free software learning platform has allowed the development of credible faceswaps in videos in recent months, which leaves only a small residue of manipulation in so-called deepfake videos. GANs create deepfakes with two computer models coming out. One is trained on the dataset, and the other aims to explain deepfakes faults. Forger produces fakes until another model does not identify forgery. Deepfakes create fake news that can contribute to financial and social fraud, videos, photographs, and terrorism. Religions, organizations, citizens and societies, environment, protection and democracy are increasingly being influenced. These realistic fake videos cause political distress, challenging someone, or fake terrorist activities are easily conceived. When deep videos and photographs expand in social media, people disregard the facts. This analysis discussed available datasets, deepfake development, deepfake issues, and fake video detection techniques, including fake video detection using GANs. Besides this, deep learning techniques for deepfake detection detailing are provided in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Oord A, Dieleman S, Zen H, Simonyan K, Vinyals O, Graves A, Kalchbrenner N, Senior A, Kavukcuoglu K (2016) WaveNet: a generative model for raw audio

    Google Scholar 

  2. BBC Bitesize (2019) Deepfakes: What are they and why would I make one? Available: https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/articles/zfkwcqt

  3. Stamm MC, Liu KJR (2010) Forensic detection of image manipulation using statistical intrinsic fingerprints. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 5(3):492–506. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2010.2053202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Galbally J, Marcel S, Fierrez J (2014) Biometric anti-spoofing methods: a survey in face recognition. IEEE Access 2:1530–1552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Karras T et al (2019) A style-based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks. In: 2019 IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), pp 4401–4410 (A.C.)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Popescu, Farid H (2005) Exposing digital forgeries in color filter array interpolated images. IEEE Trans Signal Process 53(10):3948–3959

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lin Z, He J, Tang X, Tang C-K (2009) Fast, automatic and fine-grained tampered JPEG image detection via DCT coefficient analysis. Pattern Recogn 42(11):2492–2501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rossler A, Cozzolino D, Verdoliva L, Riess C, Thies J, Nießner M (2019) FaceForensics++: learning to detect manipulated facial images. In: Proceedings of IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision

    Google Scholar 

  9. Partadiredja R, Entrena Serrano C, Ljubenkov D (2020) AI or human: the socio-ethical implications of AI-generated media content. 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wong CRQ (2016) Facebook removes bogus accounts that used AI to create fake profile pictures. https://www.cnet.com/news/facebookremoved-fake-accounts-that-used-ai-to-create-fake-profile-pictures/

  11. Mak T (2018) Can you believe your ears? With new ‘Fake News’ tech, not necessarily. https://www.npr.org/2018/04/04/599126774/can-you-believeyour-own-ears-with-new-fake\-news-tech-not-necessarily

  12. BBC News (2019) Deepfake videos could ‘Spark’ violent social unrest. https//www.bbc.com/news/technology-48621452sw

    Google Scholar 

  13. Choi Y, Choi M, Kim M, Ha J, Kim S, Choo J (2018) StarGAN: unified generative adversarial networks for multi-domain image to-image translation. In: Proceedings of IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Google Scholar 

  14. Santha A (2020) Deepfakes generation using LSTM based generative adversarial networks. Thesis. Rochester Institute of Technology. Accessed from https://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses/10447

  15. Marwan Albahar JA (2019) Deepfakes threats and countermeasures systematic review, JTAIT 97(22):3242–3250

    Google Scholar 

  16. Muluye W (2020) Deep learning algorithms and frameworks for deepfake image and video detection: a review. Int J Eng Comput Sci 9(10):25199–25207

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang Y, Zheng L, Thing V (2017) Automated face swapping and its detection. In: IEEE 2nd international conference on signal and image processing (ICSIP), pp 15–19

    Google Scholar 

  18. Liu M-Y, Breuel T, Kautz J (2017) Unsupervised image-to-image translation networks. In: Proceedings of the 31st international conference on neural information processing systems (NIPS’17). Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY, USA, pp 700–708

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhu J, Park T, Isola P, Efros AA (2017) Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks. In: 2017 IEEE international conference on computer vision (ICCV), pp 2242–2251. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV

  20. Popescu A, Farid H (2005) Exposing digital forgeries by detecting traces of re-sampling. IEEE Trans Signal Process 53:758–767. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2004.839932

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Prasad S, Ramakrishnan KR (2006) On resampling detection and its application to detect image tampering. In: IEEE international conference on multimedia and expo, pp 1325–1328. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICME.2006.262783

  22. Thies J, Zollhöfer M, Stamminger M, Theobalt C, Nießner M (2016). 2018. Face2Face: real-time face capture and reenactment of RGB videos. Commun ACM 62:96–104

    Google Scholar 

  23. Antipov G, Baccouche M, Dugelay J-L (2017) Face aging with conditional generative adversarial networks. arXiv:1702.01983

  24. Lample G et al (2017) Fader networks: manipulating images by sliding attributes. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, pp 5967–5976

    Google Scholar 

  25. Karras T, Aila T, Laine S, Lehtinen J (2017) The progressive growing of GANs for improved quality, stability, and variation. arXiv:1710.10196

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Singh, R., Shrivastava, S., Jatain, A., Bajaj, S.B. (2022). Deepfake Images, Videos Generation, and Detection Techniques Using Deep Learning. In: Agrawal, S., Gupta, K.K., Chan, J.H., Agrawal, J., Gupta, M. (eds) Machine Intelligence and Smart Systems. Algorithms for Intelligent Systems. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9650-3_39

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics