Abstract
When reliability requirements at the stage of developing complex technical systems are set, the total number of individual and complex reliability indicators set in accordance with regulatory documents is within 5–7 units. This is done provided that they are recoverable, and also for them the requirements for durability and preservation are determined. All this determines the complexity of the procedure for their verification, confirmation and evaluation. That’s why the formation of a common (integral) indicator of reliability, which can characterize the basic multitude of reliability indicators of complex technical system is very actual problem. Compliance of individual indicators with the requirements specified in the terms of reference must be performed. An approach to the formation of integral reliability indicators for the developed technical system alternatives is proposed. It is based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) developed by Thomas L. Saaty and widely used in addressing various multicriteria problems. Using an integral indicator to determine the level of reliability allows getting a formalized result, expressed through the vectors of global priority corresponding value, which makes it possible to get a quantitative assessment of the superiority for one of the technical system alternatives.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Auhadeev, A., Litvinenko, R., Fandeev. Research of reliability of urban electric transport system, V.: E3S Web Conf. 124(05078) (2019)
Georgievskaya, E. Metodicheskie printsipy otsenki nadezhnosti oborudovaniya na rannikh stadiyakh proektirovaniya: Novoe v Rossiiskoi elektroenergetike 11, 25–26 (2018)
Litvinenko, R., Aukhadeev, A., Zalyalov, R.. Podkhod k issledovaniyu nadezhnosti elektrotransportnoi sistemy goroda, kak slozhnoi tekhnicheskoi sistemy: Mir transporta I tekhnologicheskikh mashin 3(58), 108–114 (2017)
Pavlov, P., Litvinenko, R., Mubarachin, M. A technique for selecting a rational variant of a multifunctional aircraft system: Russ. Aeronaut. 51(2), 198–201 (2008)
Li, J., Yang, Y., Saaty, T. Cultural ranking of countries using the analytic hierarchy process methodology: Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 1074, 949–963 (2020)
Saaty, T. The analytic hierarchy and analytic network processes for the measurement of intangible criteria and for decision-making: Int. Ser. Oper. Res. Manag. Sci. 233, 363–419 (2016)
Saaty, T. Relative Measurement and its Generalization in Decision Making: Why Pairwise Comparisons are Central in Mathematics for the Measurement of Intangible Factors - The Analytic Hierarchy: RACSAM 102(2), 251–318 (2008)
Bykova, T. Metod analiza ierarkhii, kak instrument resheniya prakticheskikh zadach mnogokriterial'noi optimizatsii: Matematicheskoe modelirovanie, komp’yuternyi i naturnyi eksperiment v estestvennykh naukakh 1, 48–62 (2019)
Grivachev, A., Avdeev, V., Varganov, V. Modifitsirovannyi metod analiza ierarkhii dlya otsenki nazemnykh robototekhnicheskikh kompleksov: Ekstremal’naya robototekhnika 1, 409–416 (2018)
Voronkov, I. Vektor global'nykh prioritetov metoda analiza ierarkhii kak otnositel'nyi pokazatel' urovnya nadezhnosti potentsial'nykh uchastnikov investitsionno-stroitel'nykh proektov: Vestnik BGTU im. V.G. Shukhova 11, 137–145 (2018)
Saaty, T. Seven is the magic number in nature: Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. 160(4), 335–360 (2016)
Saati, T. Ob izmerenii neosyazaemogo. Podkhod k otnositel'nym izmereniyam na osnove glavnogo sobstvennogo vektora matritsy parnykh sravnenii: Cloud Sci. 1(2), 5–39 (2015)
Slavnov, K. Osobennosti modifikatsii metoda analiza ierarkhii T.Saati dlya otsenki sistem kontrolya konfidentsial'noi informatsii: Okhrana, bezopasnost’, svyaz’ 1–2, 119–125 (2017)
Finogenko, I., D’yakovich, M. Metod analiza ierarkhii i postroenie integral'nykh pokazatelei slozhnykh system: Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta, Seriya: estestvennye i tekhnicheskie nauki 1–6(22), 1335–1340 (2017)
Dolinina, O. Metod generatsii testov dlya otladki baz znanii ekspertnykh system: Programmnaya inzheneriya 5, 40–47 (2011)
Pyatakovich, V., Vasilenko, A. Teoreticheskie polozheniya sinteza obuchayushchei vyborki neiro-ekspertnoi sistemy klassifikatsii morskikh tekhnicheskikh ob"ektov: Tekhnicheskie nauki: problemi i resheniya, 10–19 (2017)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Litvinenko, R., Auhadeev, A., Khusnutdinov, A., Antipanova, I., Kisneeva, L. (2022). An Approach to Determining the Integrated Reliability of Technical Systems at the Development Stage. In: Irina, A., Zunino, P. (eds) Proceedings of the International Symposium on Sustainable Energy and Power Engineering 2021. SUSE 2021. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9376-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9376-2_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-9375-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-9376-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)