Skip to main content

Assessment of the Conditioning Factor for Flash Flood Susceptibility Potential Based on Bivariate Statistical Approach in the Wonoboyo Watershed in East Java, Indonesia

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Rehabilitation and Maintenance in Civil Engineering (ICRMCE 2021)

Abstract

Flash floods that occur suddenly, which cause damage to the weirs or embankments, immediately threaten human life. Identifying the causes of a flash flood is very important to reduce its negative impact. This paper examines changes in flash flood disasters in the Wonoboyo watershed based on estimates of flash flood hazard, land-use changes, and rainfall depth distribution patterns. The method of predicting susceptibility to flash flood hazards is based on various environmental factors that are integrated with GIS. Three bivariate statistics consisting of the Statistical Index (SI), Frequency Ratio (FR), and Predictor Rate (FP-PR) model are applied to select the best Flash Susceptibility Index (FFHSI) model. Changes in land use are then explored based on the conditioning factor for a flash flood. In the final stage, the estimation of areal rainfall uses Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW) to describe the position of rain and flash flood events. The best statistical bivariate statistical approach for the FFHSI is FR. Assessment of environmental factors using the FFHSI shows that 21% of the catchment area has moderate to high until very high vulnerability levels. Changes in land cover significantly affect flash floods, especially changes from forest to agricultural land or settlements. The distribution pattern and intensity of rainfall are closely related to the location of the flash flood. This study results can guide future flood mitigation measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Elkhrachy I (2015) Flash flood hazard mapping using satellite images and GIS tools: a case study of Najran City, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Egypt J Remote Sens Sp Sci 18(2):261–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2015.06.007

  2. Hapuarachchi HAP, Wang QJ, Pagano TC (2011) A review of advances in flash flood forecasting. Hydrol Process 25(18):2771–2784. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8040

  3. Antarafoto (2008) Banjir Desa Wonoboyo, antarafoto

    Google Scholar 

  4. BPBD (2016) BPBD Jatim Bantu Korban Banjir dan Tanah Longsor di’, BPBD. https://web.bpbd.jatimprov.go.id/2016/02/01/bpbd-jatim-bantu-korban-banjir-dan-tanah-longsor-di-bondowoso/. Accessed Feb 27 2021

  5. Beritaekspress (2017) Akibat Banjir, Akses ke Desa Wonoboyo Jatim Lumpuh, beritaekspres

    Google Scholar 

  6. Terbitannews (2020) Akibat Hujan Deras, Banjir dan Longsor Terjadi di Desa Leprak Bondowoso, Terbitannews

    Google Scholar 

  7. Faktualnews (2018) 3 Kecamatan di Bondowoso Diterjang Banjir Bandang, faktualnews. https://faktualnews.co/2018/01/28/3-kecamatan-bondowoso-diterjang-banjir-bandang/60730/. Accessed 27 Feb 2021

  8. Gaume E, Borga M (2008) Post-flood field investigations in upland catchments after major flash floods: proposal of a methodology and illustrations. J Flood Risk Manag 1(4):175–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-318x.2008.00023.x

  9. Cao C, Xu P, Wang Y, Chen J, Zheng L, Niu C (2016) Flash flood hazard susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio and statistical index methods in coalmine subsidence areas. Sustainability 8(9) (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090948

  10. Pradhan (2009) Flood susceptible mapping and risk area delineation using logistic regression, GIS and remote sensing. J Spat Hydrol 9(2):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jodar-Abellan A, Valdes-Abellan J, Pla C, Gomariz-Castillo F (2019) Impact of land use changes on flash flood prediction using a sub-daily SWAT model in five Mediterranean ungauged watersheds (SE Spain). Sci Total Environ 657:1578–1591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.034

  12. Costache R, Hong H, Pham (2020) QB (711) Comparative assessment of the flash-flood potential within small mountain catchments using bivariate statistics and their novel hybrid integration with machine learning models. Sci Total Environ 711:134514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134514

  13. Bui DT, Tsangaratos P, Ngo PTT, Pham TD, Pham BT (2019) Flash flood susceptibility modeling using an optimized fuzzy rule based feature selection technique and tree based ensemble methods. Sci Total Environ 668:1038–1054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.422

  14. Popa MC et al (2020) Spatial assessment of flash-flood vulnerability in the Moldova river catchment (N Romania) using the FFPI. J Flood Risk Manag 2019:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12624

  15. Khosravi K et al (2018) A comparative assessment of decision trees algorithms for flash flood susceptibility modeling at Haraz watershed, Northern Iran. Sci Total Environ 627:744–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lappas I, Kallioras A (2019) Flood susceptibility assessment through GIS-based multi-criteria approach and analytical hierarchy process (AHP ) in a River Basin in Central Greece, IRJET, pp 738–751

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stefanidis S, Stathis D (2013) Assessment of flood hazard based on natural and anthropogenic factors using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Nat Hazards 68(2):569–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0639-5

  18. Kazakis N, Kougias I, Patsialis T (2015) Assessment of flood hazard areas at a regional scale using an index-based approach and analytical hierarchy process: application in Rhodope-Evros region, Greece. Sci Total Environ 538:555–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Costache R (2019) Flash-flood potential assessment in the upper and middle sector of Prahova river catchment (Romania). A comparative approach between four hybrid models. Sci Total Environ 659:1115–1134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.397

  20. Khosravi K, Nohani E, Maroufinia E, Pourghasemi HR (2016) A GIS-based flood susceptibility assessment and its mapping in Iran: a comparison between frequency ratio and weights-of-evidence bivariate statistical models with multi-criteria decision-making technique. Nat Hazards 83(2):947–987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2357-2

  21. Khosravi K, Pourghasemi HR (2016) Flash flood susceptibility analysis and its mapping using different bivariate models in Iran: a comparison between Shannon’s entropy, statistical index, and weighting factor models. Environ Monit Assess. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5665-9

  22. Costache R, Zaharia L (2017) Flash-flood potential assessment and mapping by integrating the weights-of-evidence and frequency ratio statistical methods in GIS environment—case study. Bâsca Chiojdului River Catchment (Romania). J Earth Syst Sci 126(4):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-017-0828-9

  23. Efendi D, Hidayah E, Hasanuddin A (2020) U KaRsT, Mapping of landslide susceptible zones by using frequency. Ratios Bluncong 5(1):126–141. https://doi.org/10.30737/ukarst.v3i2

  24. Tehrany MS, Pradhan B, Jebur MN (2015) Flood susceptibility analysis and its verification using a novel ensemble support vector machine and frequency ratio method. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 29(4):1149–1165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-015-1021-9

  25. Beven K (1984) Infiltration into a class of vertically non-uniform soils, Hydrol Sci J 29(4):425–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626668409490960

  26. Manfreda S, Di Leo M, Sole A (2011) Detection of flood-prone areas using digital elevation models. J Hydrol Eng 16(10):781–790. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0000367

  27. Duman TY, Can T, Gokceoglu C, Nefeslioglu HA, Sonmez H (2006) Application of logistic regression for landslide susceptibility zoning of Cekmece Area, Istanbul, Turkey. Environ Geol 51(2):241–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-006-0322-1

  28. Fernández DS, Lutz MA (2010) Urban flood Hazard zoning In Tucumán Province, Argentina. Using GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. Eng Geol 111(1–4):90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.12.006

  29. Glenn EP, Morino K, Nagler PL, Murray RS, Pearlstein S, Hultine KR (2012) Roles of Saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) and capillary rise in salinizing a non-flooding terrace on a flow-regulated Desert River. J Arid Environ 79:56–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.11.025

  30. Falahnsia AR (2014) Vegetasi dengan metode skoring menggunakan citra satelit di, pp 400–416

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ullah K, Zhang J (2020) GIS-based flood hazard mapping using relative frequency ratio method: a case study of Panjkora River Basin, Eastern Hindu Kush, Pakistan. PLoS One 15(3):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229153

  32. Ullah K, Zhang J, Id JZ (2020) GIS-based flood hazard mapping using relative frequency ratio method: a case study of Panjkora River Basin, Eastern Hindu Kush, Pakistan. PLoS 15(3):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229153

  33. Abdulwahid WM, Pradhan B (2017) Landslide vulnerability and risk assessment for multi-hazard scenarios using airborne laser scanning data (LiDAR). Landslides 14(3):1057–1076. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-016-0744-0

  34. Van Westen CJ, Rengers N, Terlien M (1997) Prediction of the occurrence of slope instability phenomena through GIS-based hazard zonation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005310050149

  35. Regmi AD et al (2014) Application of frequency ratio, statistical index, and weights-of-evidence models and their comparison in landslide susceptibility mapping in Central Nepal Himalaya. Arab J Geosci 7(2):725–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0807-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bartier PM, Keller CP (1996) Multivariate interpolation to incorporate thematic surface data using inverse distance weighting (IDW). Comput Geosci 22(7):795–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-3004(96)00021-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chen FW, Liu CW (2012) Estimation of the spatial rainfall distribution using inverse distance weighting (IDW) in the middle of Taiwan. Paddy Water Environ 10(3):209–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-012-0319-1

  38. Yang X, Xie X, Liu DL, Ji F, Wang L (2015) Spatial interpolation of daily rainfall data for local climate impact assessment over Greater Sydney Region. Adv Meteorol. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/563629

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Entin Hidayah .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hidayah, E., Halik, G., Widiarti, W.Y. (2023). Assessment of the Conditioning Factor for Flash Flood Susceptibility Potential Based on Bivariate Statistical Approach in the Wonoboyo Watershed in East Java, Indonesia. In: Kristiawan, S.A., Gan, B.S., Shahin, M., Sharma, A. (eds) Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Rehabilitation and Maintenance in Civil Engineering. ICRMCE 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 225. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9348-9_49

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9348-9_49

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-9347-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-9348-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics