Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Critical Review of Bridge Management System in Indonesia

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Rehabilitation and Maintenance in Civil Engineering (ICRMCE 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 225))

Abstract

The bridge is a crucial infrastructure in public mobilization. Recently, the utilization of old bridges has intensely come into an option during limited funds in many developing countries. Hence, the bridge management system plays an important role in maintaining and reducing bridge failure. In Indonesia, the bridge management system is called Interurban Bridge Management System (IBMS). However, the IBMS implementation in Indonesia is still poor. This system has been implemented throughout all provinces in Indonesia since 1992, yet many bridges were still found damaged, even collapsed. At this moment, Indonesia is still focusing on construction, not maintenance work. Some developed countries like the United States of America and Japan have expanded a complex system for a bridge management system, Pontis, and J-BMS. Thailand as a developing country is the same as Indonesia has also realized the importance of having a bridge management system. Thailand has established a Bridge Maintenance and Management System (BMMS) to guide the periodic bridge inspection and maintenance program. In this study, the authors intend to grow the awareness of the IBMS application in Indonesia which consist of the development of bridge management system, the causes of poor IBMS implementation, the improvement needs to enhance the IBMS implementation, and recommended aspects may extend to current IBMS implementation in Indonesia by seeking for and integrating the advantageous information the existing bridge management system (BMS) that has been established and implemented in the U.S., Japan, and Thailand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    1 IDR = 0.000070 USD.

References

  1. Worldbank Homepage. https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/indonesia/overview. Last accessed 2021/02/22

  2. Data and Information Technology, General Secretary, The Ministry of Public Work and Public Housing of the Republic of Indonesia (2020) Infrastructure statistical information PUPR 2020. PUPR, Jakarta (In Bahasa Indonesia)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Marwoto S (2019) Damage evaluation application for concrete bridges based on expert systems with android technology. Jurnal Riset Rekayasa Sipil Universitas Sebelas Maret 3:34–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sriskandan K (1990) Bridge management—an overview. In: Harding JE, Parke GAR, Ryall MJ (1990) Bridge management—inspection, maintenance, assessment and repair. Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, London, pp 17–29

    Google Scholar 

  5. Directorate General of Bina Marga, Ministry of the Public Works Republic of Indonesia (1993) Bridge management system (BMS): bridge inspection manual. Directorate General of Bina Marga, Jakarta (In Bahasa Indonesia)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Suksuwan N (2010) Condition rating system for Thailand’s concrete bridges. J Construct Dev Countries 15(1):1–27

    Google Scholar 

  7. TDOH (2012) BMMS: bridge management and maintenance system. Department of Highway, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  8. Suksuwan N, Hadikusumo BH (2009) Development of computer applications for bridge management system. In: IABSE symposium: sustainable infrastructure—environment friendly, safe and resource efficient. Sustainable infrastructure—environment friendly, safe and resource efficient, Bangkok, pp 130–139

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ginting DT (2001) Study on the efficiency of bridge maintenance at BMS Bina Marga and efforts to determine the pattern of maintenance cost allocation [Master Thesis]. Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung (In Bahasa Indonesia)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lee S, Kalos N, Shin DH (2014) Non-destructive testing methods in the U.S. for bridge inspection and maintenance. KSCE J Civil Eng 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  11. MLIT Hompage. https://www.mlit.go.jp/road/road_e/s3_maintenance.html, Last accessed 2021/03/27

  12. Miyamoto A (2012) Life-cycle performance of deteriorating structures. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IABMAS workshop on life-cycle cost analysis and design of civil infrastructures systems. American Society of Civil Engineers, Lausanne

    Google Scholar 

  13. Anders B, Sorensen FB (1990) Implementation of bridge management and maintenance systems (BMMS) in Europe and the Far East. In: Harding JE, Parke GAR, Ryall MJ (eds) Bridge management—inspection, maintenance, assessment and repair. Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, London, pp 28–38

    Google Scholar 

  14. Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) CHODAI Co., Ltd and Metropolitan Expressway Company Limited.: Kingdom of Thailand the Project for Bridge Master Plan and Bridge Maintenance Ability in Rural Area Report. Japan International Cooperation Agency, CHODAI Co., Ltd and Metropolitan Expressway Company Limited, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  15. Putra GA, Rio K, Hatmojo D (2012) Study on the importance of bridge management system (BMS) applications and standard operating procedures (POS) in maintaining the quality value of bridge infrastructure, case study bridge infrastructure—bridges in Indonesia. In: SCAN#3 National Proceeding Conference. Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta (2012)(In Bahasa Indonesia)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Banten suara Homepage. https://banten.suara.com/read. Last accessed 2021/02/26 (In Bahasa Indonesia)

  17. Data and Information Technology, General Secretary (2018) The ministry of public work and public housing of the Republic of Indonesia.: infrastructure statistical information PUPR 2018 (In Bahasa Indonesia). PUPR, Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bisnis Homepage. https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20180426/45/788964/dana-pemeliharaan-jalan-jembatan-rp2370-triliun. Last accessed 2021/05/27 (In Bahasa Indonesia)

  19. Dananjoyo RA, Aminullah A, Nugroho ASB (2020) Application of life-cycle cost method in calculation of economic evaluation of bridges to determine the priority of bridge handling. Jurnal Teknosains 9(2):91–180 (in Bahasa Indonesia)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Liu Min AM, Frangopol DM (2005) Multiobjective maintenance planning optimization for deteriorating bridges considering condition, safety, and life-cycle cost. J Struct Eng 131(5):833–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. The Ministry of Public Work and Public Housing of the Republic of Indonesia.: Module 2 Bridge Management System. PUPR Internal Module, Bandung (2017) (In Bahasa Indonesia)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sumargo, Hakiki R, Raafidiani R (2020) Condition inspection and handling of bridges in Nias Island, North Sumatra province by using the bridge management system method. Jurnal Sipil Politeknik 22(2):156–168 (in Bahasa Indonesia)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kawai Y, Dionysius S, Yozo F (2014) Failure analysis of the hanger clamps of the Kutai-Kartanegara Bridge from the fracture mechanics viewpoint. J Jpn Soc Civil Eng 2:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  24. 逊 汪 Homepage. https://www.academia.edu/5832394/A_STUDY_ON_THE_CAUSE_OF_KUKAR_BRIDGE_COLLAPSE. Last accessed 2021/02/26

  25. Luknanto Homepage. https://luk.staff.ugm.ac.id/kukar. Last accessed 2021/02/26 (in Bahasa Indonesia)

  26. Small E, Philbin T, Fraher M, Romack G (1999) The current status of bridge management system implementation in the United States

    Google Scholar 

  27. Puspitasari SD, Kawabata Y, Yokota H (2019) Optimization of life-cycle management on port mooring facilities. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Summer Symposium in junction with the 74th JSCE Annual Conference. Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Takamatsu

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kawabata Y, Kato E, Tanaka Y (2018) A maintenance management plan for port mooring facilities based on cost-benefit analysis—a case study. In: Proceedings of life-cycle of engineering systems: towards an integrated vision. international association on life-cycle civil engineering, Ghent

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yokota H, Hashimoto K, Tani T (2016) Sensitivity analysis on repair prioritization for mooring facilities. In: Life-cycle of engineering systems: emphasis on sustainable civil infrastructure. International Association on Life-Cycle Civil Engineering, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  30. Xie HB, Wu WJ, Wang YF (2018) Life-time reliability based optimization of bridge maintenance strategy considering LCA and LCC. J Clean Prod 176:36–45

    Google Scholar 

  31. Jeong Y, Kim W, Lee I, Lee J (2018) Bridge inspection practices and bridge management programs in China, Japan, Korea, and US. J Struct Integr Maint 3(2):126–135

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transportation, and Tourism (2014) Manual for bridge periodic inspection. ministry of land, infrastructure, transportation, and tourism, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mirzaei Z, Adey BT, Klatter L, Kong JS (2014) Overview of existing bridge management systems. The IABMAS Bridge Management Committee

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Military Engineering, Universitas Pertahanan RI, Bogor, 16810, Indonesia

    Surya Dewi Puspitasari & Sabrina Harahap

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, 55138, Indonesia

    Pinta Astuti

Authors
  1. Surya Dewi Puspitasari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sabrina Harahap
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pinta Astuti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Surya Dewi Puspitasari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia

    Stefanus Adi Kristiawan

  2. College of Engineering, Nihon University, Tokyo, Japan

    Buntara S. Gan

  3. Department of Civil Engineering, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia

    Mohamed Shahin

  4. Institute of Construction Materials, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany

    Akanshu Sharma

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Puspitasari, S.D., Harahap, S., Astuti, P. (2023). A Critical Review of Bridge Management System in Indonesia. In: Kristiawan, S.A., Gan, B.S., Shahin, M., Sharma, A. (eds) Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Rehabilitation and Maintenance in Civil Engineering. ICRMCE 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 225. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9348-9_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9348-9_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-9347-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-9348-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation