Abstract
Portal hypertension (PH) is a known complication of liver cirrhosis and is caused by increased resistance to blood flow in the hepatic sinusoids. Once PH develops, the clinical manifestations may include esophageal and gastric varices, portal hypertensive gastropathy, ascites, splenomegaly, and thrombocytopenia. Assessing the intravascular pressure of the portal vein (relative to the hepatic vein) has been useful in determining the stage, progression, prognosis of cirrhosis, as well as the risk for developing hepatocellular carcinoma in individual patients with liver disease. While the hepatic vein can be directly measured using a trans-jugular approach (called the free hepatic venous pressure, or FHVP), the portal vein pressure is assessed indirectly from the wedged hepatic venous pressure (WHVP). In cirrhosis, the WHVP closely reflects portal (sinusoidal) pressure, as the catheter with balloon occlusion creates a continuous fluid column between the catheter, the blood in the hepatic vein, the sinusoidal tract and the portal vein. The difference or gradient between the FHVP and the WHVP is known as the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG). The HVPG accurately reflects the degree of PH in all forms of sinusoidal and post-sinusoidal causes of PH, but not in pre-sinusoidal PH. A portal pressure gradient (PPG) measurement of 0–5 mmHg is considered within the normal range, while 6–9 mmHg is considered portal hypertension, ≥10 mmHg is considered “clinically significant” portal hypertension and associated with the development of esophageal varices [1], and finally, a PPG of ≥12 mmHg is associated with variceal hemorrhage [2]. Reduction of PPG by 20% or to below 12 mmHg with pharmacotherapy has been shown to decrease risk of future bleeding or rebleeding episodes [3, 4].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bosch J, Garcia-Pagan JC, Berzigotti A, et al. Measurement of portal pressure and its role in the management of chronic liver disease. Semin Liver Dis. 2006;26:348–62.
Groszmann RJ, Bosch J, Grace ND, et al. Hemodynamic events in a prospective randomized trial of propranolol versus placebo in the prevention of a first variceal hemorrhage. Gastroenterology. 1990;99:1401–7.
Albillos A, Banares R, Gonzalez M, et al. Value of the hepatic venous pressure gradient to monitor drug therapy for portal hypertension: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:1116–26.
D’Amico G, Garcia-Pagan JC, Luca A, et al. Hepatic vein pressure gradient reduction and prevention of variceal bleeding in cirrhosis: a systematic review. Gastroenterology. 2006;131:1611–24.
Nakhleh RE. The pathological differential diagnosis of portal hypertension. Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2017;10:57–62.
Yan M, Geyer H, Mesa R, et al. Clinical features of patients with Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms complicated by portal hypertension. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2015;15:e1–5.
Huang JY, Samarasena JB, Tsujino T, et al. EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement with a novel 25-gauge needle device versus standard transjugular approach: a comparison animal study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84:358–62.
Huang JY, Samarasena JB, Tsujino T, et al. EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement with a simple novel device: a human pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:996–1001.
Samarasena JB, Huang JY, Tsujino T, et al. EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement with a simple novel device: a human pilot study. VideoGIE. 2018;3:361–3.
Samarasena JB, Han J, Patel A, et al. EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement: a single center experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:AB107.
Tsujino T, Huang JY, Samarasena JB, et al. Safety and feasibility of combination EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement and liver biopsy: the realization of endo-hepatology. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83:AB415–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
Dr. Chang has served as consultant for Apollo Endosurgery, Cook, Erbe, Endogastric Solutions, Mauna Kea, Mederi, Medtronics, Olympus, Ovesco, and Pentax.
Additional information
Author contributions: Chang KJ designed the overall concept, outline of this manuscript and was responsible for writing, and editing of the manuscript. Imagawa DK was responsible for reviewing and editing the manuscript.
1 Electronic Supplementary Material
EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement (MP4 208418 kb)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chang, K.J., Imagawa, D.K. (2022). EUS-Guided Portal Pressure Gradient Measurement. In: Teoh, A.Y., Giovaninni, M., Khashab, M.A., Itoi, T. (eds) Atlas of Interventional EUS. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9340-3_52
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9340-3_52
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-9339-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-9340-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)