Skip to main content

Speckle Reduction in Ultrasound Images Using Hybridization of Wavelet-Based Novel Thresholding Approach with Guided Filter

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advance Concepts of Image Processing and Pattern Recognition

Part of the book series: Transactions on Computer Systems and Networks ((TCSN))

  • 717 Accesses

Abstract

The research work is aimed to explore and develop some new techniques in the area of speckle reduction. The algorithms are devised and implemented in transform domain for speckle reduction in ultrasound images. The high-quality ultrasound images can improve the accuracy and speed of subsequent image processing tasks and can yield better diagnosis results. In this work, we have proposed a hybrid method to reduce speckle from ultrasound images while maintaining a trade-off between speckle reduction and edge preservation. Extensive work is carried out by taking four different types of images for research which contains synthetic images, simulated images, noise-free ultrasound images, and real ultrasound images. The performance of proposed methods is measured by using different image quality metrics such as PSNR, MSE, COC, SSIM, FSIM, and EPI for all given sets of images except real ultrasound images. The real ultrasound images are compared by using visual comparison and metric SSI because it does not use reference images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adamo F, Andria G, Attivissimo F, Lanzolla AML, Spadavecchia M (2013) A comparative study on mother wavelet selection in ultrasound image denoising. Measurement 46(8):2447–2456

    Google Scholar 

  • Ando K, Nagaoka R, Hasegawa H (2020) Speckle reduction of medical ultrasound images using deep learning with fully convolutional network. Japanese J Appl Phys 59(SK), SKKE06

    Google Scholar 

  • Balocco S, Gatta C, Pujol O, Mauri J, Radeva P (2010) SRBF: Speckle reducing bilateral filtering. Ultrasound Med Biol 36(8):1353–1363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.05.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carovac A, Smajlovic F, Junuzovic D (2011) Application of ultrasound in medicine. Acta Informatica Med 19(3):168

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan V, Perlas A (2010) Basics of ultrasound imaging. In: Atlas of ultrasound-guided procedures in interventional pain management. Springer, New York, pp 13–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang SG, Bin Yu, Vetterli M (2000) Adaptive wavelet thresholding for image denoising and compression. IEEE Trans Image Process 9(9):1532–1546

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen GY, Bui TD, Krzyzak A (2005) Image denoising using neighbouring wavelet coefficients. In: 2004 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech, and signal processing. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/icassp.2004.1326408

  • Chen Y, Zhang M, Yan H-M, Li Y-J, Yang K-F (2019) A new ultrasound speckle reduction algorithm based on superpixel segmentation and detail compensation. Appl Sci 9(8):1693. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9081693

  • Choi H, Jeong J (2020) Despeckling algorithm for removing speckle noise from ultrasound images. Symmetry 12(6):938

    Google Scholar 

  • Czerwinski RN, Jones DL, O’Brien WD (1995) Ultrasound speckle reduction by directional median filtering. In: Proceedings of international conference on image processing, IEEE Comput Soc Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Donoho DL, Johnstone IM (1994) Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage. Biometrika 81(3):425–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Donoho DL, Johnstone IM (1995) Adapting to unknown smoothness via wavelet shrinkage. J Am Statistical Assoc 90(432):1200–1224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1995.10476626

  • Elyasi I, Zarmehi S (2009) Elimination noise by adaptive wavelet threshold. World Acad Sci 32(1):462–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost VS, Stiles JA, Shanmugan KS, Holtzman JC (1982) A model for radar images and its application to adaptive digital filtering of multiplicative noise. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intelligence PAMI-4(2):157–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez RC, Woods RE (2008) Digital image processing. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo Y, Wang Y, Hou T (2011) Speckle filtering of ultrasonic images using a modified non local-based algorithm. Biomed Signal Process Control 6(2):129–138

    Google Scholar 

  • He K, Sun J, Tang X (2013) Guided image filtering. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intelligence 35(6):1397–1409. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2012.213

  • Jain L, Singh P (2020) A novel wavelet thresholding rule for speckle reduction from ultrasound images. J King Saud Univ—Comput Information Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2020.10.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen JA (1996) Field: a program for simulating ultrasound systems. In: 10th Nordic-Baltic conference on biomedical imaging published in medical and biological engineering and computing, vol 34, issue 1, pp 351–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen JA, Svendsen NB (1992) Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers. IEEE Trans Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics Frequency Control 39(2):262–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph WG (1976) Some fundamental properties of speckle. J Optical Soc Am 66(11):1145–1150

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaur L, Gupta S, Chauhan R (2002) Image denoising using wavelet thresholding. In: International conference on computer vision, graphics and image processing

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuan DT, Sawchuk AA, Strand TC, Chavel P (1985) Adaptive noise smoothing filter for images with signal-dependent noise. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intelligence PAMI-7(2):165–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee J-S (1980) Digital image enhancement and noise filtering by use of local statistics. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intelligence PAMI-2(2):165–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin Z, Zhang L, Mou X, Zhang D (2011) FSIM A feature similarity index for image quality assessment. IEEE Trans Image Process 20(8):2378–2386

    Google Scholar 

  • Loupas T, McDicken WN, Allan PL (1989) An adaptive weighted median filter for speckle suppression in medical ultrasonic images. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst 36(1):129–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Perona P, Malik J (1990) Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intelligence 12(7):629–639

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiu F, Berglund J, Jensen JR, Thakkar P, Ren D (2004) Speckle noise reduction in SAR imagery using a local adaptive median filter. GIScience Remote Sens 41(3): 244–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratliff ST (2013) Webb’s physics of medical imaging. Med Phys 40(9) (2nd edn)

    Google Scholar 

  • Real ultrasound images database collected from Geldrsevallei hospital, the Netherland. https://ultrasoundcases.com/Case-List.aspx?cat=229. Accessed on 21–02–2016

  • Sagheer MSV, George SN (2017) Ultrasound image despeckling using low rank matrix approximation approach. Biomed Signal Process Control 38:236–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2017.06.011

  • Sang Y-F, Wang D, Wu J-C, Zhu Q-P, Wang L (2009) Entropy-based wavelet de-noising method for time series analysis. Entropy 11(4):1123–1147

    Google Scholar 

  • Sattar F, Floreby L, Salomonsson G, Lovstrom B (1997) Image enhancement based on a nonlinear multiscale method. IEEE Trans Image Process 6(6):888–895

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheng Y, Xia Z-G (2004) A comprehensive evaluation of filters for radar speckle suppression. In: IGARSS ’96. 1996 international geoscience and remote sensing symposium. IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR, Simoncelli EP (2004) Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Process 13(4):600–612

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells PNT, Halliwell M (1981) Speckle in ultrasonic imaging. Ultrasonics 19(5):225–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen H, Qi W (2015) Enhancement and denoising method of medical ultrasound image based on wavelet analysis and fuzzy theory. In: 2015 Seventh international conference on measuring technology and mechatronics automation IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  • Yongjian Yu, Acton ST (2002) Speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans Image Process 11(11):1260–1270. https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2002.804276

  • Zhang J, Lin G, Wu L, Wang C, Cheng Y (2015) Wavelet and fast bilateral filter based de-speckling method for medical ultrasound images. Biomed Signal Process Control 18:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2014.11.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Lin G, Wu L, Cheng Y (2016) Speckle filtering of medical ultrasonic images using wavelet and guided filter. Ultrasonics 65:177–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2015.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou W, Bovik AC (2009) Mean squared error: love it or leave it? A new look at signal fidelity measures. IEEE Signal Process Mag 26(1):98–117

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jain, L., Singh, P. (2022). Speckle Reduction in Ultrasound Images Using Hybridization of Wavelet-Based Novel Thresholding Approach with Guided Filter. In: Kumar, N., Shahnaz, C., Kumar, K., Abed Mohammed, M., Raw, R.S. (eds) Advance Concepts of Image Processing and Pattern Recognition. Transactions on Computer Systems and Networks. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9324-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9324-3_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-9323-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-9324-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics