Abstract
The research work is aimed to explore and develop some new techniques in the area of speckle reduction. The algorithms are devised and implemented in transform domain for speckle reduction in ultrasound images. The high-quality ultrasound images can improve the accuracy and speed of subsequent image processing tasks and can yield better diagnosis results. In this work, we have proposed a hybrid method to reduce speckle from ultrasound images while maintaining a trade-off between speckle reduction and edge preservation. Extensive work is carried out by taking four different types of images for research which contains synthetic images, simulated images, noise-free ultrasound images, and real ultrasound images. The performance of proposed methods is measured by using different image quality metrics such as PSNR, MSE, COC, SSIM, FSIM, and EPI for all given sets of images except real ultrasound images. The real ultrasound images are compared by using visual comparison and metric SSI because it does not use reference images.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adamo F, Andria G, Attivissimo F, Lanzolla AML, Spadavecchia M (2013) A comparative study on mother wavelet selection in ultrasound image denoising. Measurement 46(8):2447–2456
Ando K, Nagaoka R, Hasegawa H (2020) Speckle reduction of medical ultrasound images using deep learning with fully convolutional network. Japanese J Appl Phys 59(SK), SKKE06
Balocco S, Gatta C, Pujol O, Mauri J, Radeva P (2010) SRBF: Speckle reducing bilateral filtering. Ultrasound Med Biol 36(8):1353–1363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.05.007
Carovac A, Smajlovic F, Junuzovic D (2011) Application of ultrasound in medicine. Acta Informatica Med 19(3):168
Chan V, Perlas A (2010) Basics of ultrasound imaging. In: Atlas of ultrasound-guided procedures in interventional pain management. Springer, New York, pp 13–19
Chang SG, Bin Yu, Vetterli M (2000) Adaptive wavelet thresholding for image denoising and compression. IEEE Trans Image Process 9(9):1532–1546
Chen GY, Bui TD, Krzyzak A (2005) Image denoising using neighbouring wavelet coefficients. In: 2004 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech, and signal processing. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/icassp.2004.1326408
Chen Y, Zhang M, Yan H-M, Li Y-J, Yang K-F (2019) A new ultrasound speckle reduction algorithm based on superpixel segmentation and detail compensation. Appl Sci 9(8):1693. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9081693
Choi H, Jeong J (2020) Despeckling algorithm for removing speckle noise from ultrasound images. Symmetry 12(6):938
Czerwinski RN, Jones DL, O’Brien WD (1995) Ultrasound speckle reduction by directional median filtering. In: Proceedings of international conference on image processing, IEEE Comput Soc Press
Donoho DL, Johnstone IM (1994) Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage. Biometrika 81(3):425–455
Donoho DL, Johnstone IM (1995) Adapting to unknown smoothness via wavelet shrinkage. J Am Statistical Assoc 90(432):1200–1224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1995.10476626
Elyasi I, Zarmehi S (2009) Elimination noise by adaptive wavelet threshold. World Acad Sci 32(1):462–466
Frost VS, Stiles JA, Shanmugan KS, Holtzman JC (1982) A model for radar images and its application to adaptive digital filtering of multiplicative noise. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intelligence PAMI-4(2):157–166
Gonzalez RC, Woods RE (2008) Digital image processing. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
Guo Y, Wang Y, Hou T (2011) Speckle filtering of ultrasonic images using a modified non local-based algorithm. Biomed Signal Process Control 6(2):129–138
He K, Sun J, Tang X (2013) Guided image filtering. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intelligence 35(6):1397–1409. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2012.213
Jain L, Singh P (2020) A novel wavelet thresholding rule for speckle reduction from ultrasound images. J King Saud Univ—Comput Information Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2020.10.009
Jensen JA (1996) Field: a program for simulating ultrasound systems. In: 10th Nordic-Baltic conference on biomedical imaging published in medical and biological engineering and computing, vol 34, issue 1, pp 351–353
Jensen JA, Svendsen NB (1992) Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers. IEEE Trans Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics Frequency Control 39(2):262–267
Joseph WG (1976) Some fundamental properties of speckle. J Optical Soc Am 66(11):1145–1150
Kaur L, Gupta S, Chauhan R (2002) Image denoising using wavelet thresholding. In: International conference on computer vision, graphics and image processing
Kuan DT, Sawchuk AA, Strand TC, Chavel P (1985) Adaptive noise smoothing filter for images with signal-dependent noise. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intelligence PAMI-7(2):165–177
Lee J-S (1980) Digital image enhancement and noise filtering by use of local statistics. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intelligence PAMI-2(2):165–168
Lin Z, Zhang L, Mou X, Zhang D (2011) FSIM A feature similarity index for image quality assessment. IEEE Trans Image Process 20(8):2378–2386
Loupas T, McDicken WN, Allan PL (1989) An adaptive weighted median filter for speckle suppression in medical ultrasonic images. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst 36(1):129–135
Perona P, Malik J (1990) Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intelligence 12(7):629–639
Qiu F, Berglund J, Jensen JR, Thakkar P, Ren D (2004) Speckle noise reduction in SAR imagery using a local adaptive median filter. GIScience Remote Sens 41(3): 244–266
Ratliff ST (2013) Webb’s physics of medical imaging. Med Phys 40(9) (2nd edn)
Real ultrasound images database collected from Geldrsevallei hospital, the Netherland. https://ultrasoundcases.com/Case-List.aspx?cat=229. Accessed on 21–02–2016
Sagheer MSV, George SN (2017) Ultrasound image despeckling using low rank matrix approximation approach. Biomed Signal Process Control 38:236–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2017.06.011
Sang Y-F, Wang D, Wu J-C, Zhu Q-P, Wang L (2009) Entropy-based wavelet de-noising method for time series analysis. Entropy 11(4):1123–1147
Sattar F, Floreby L, Salomonsson G, Lovstrom B (1997) Image enhancement based on a nonlinear multiscale method. IEEE Trans Image Process 6(6):888–895
Sheng Y, Xia Z-G (2004) A comprehensive evaluation of filters for radar speckle suppression. In: IGARSS ’96. 1996 international geoscience and remote sensing symposium. IEEE
Wang Z, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR, Simoncelli EP (2004) Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Process 13(4):600–612
Wells PNT, Halliwell M (1981) Speckle in ultrasonic imaging. Ultrasonics 19(5):225–229
Wen H, Qi W (2015) Enhancement and denoising method of medical ultrasound image based on wavelet analysis and fuzzy theory. In: 2015 Seventh international conference on measuring technology and mechatronics automation IEEE
Yongjian Yu, Acton ST (2002) Speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans Image Process 11(11):1260–1270. https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2002.804276
Zhang J, Lin G, Wu L, Wang C, Cheng Y (2015) Wavelet and fast bilateral filter based de-speckling method for medical ultrasound images. Biomed Signal Process Control 18:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2014.11.010
Zhang J, Lin G, Wu L, Cheng Y (2016) Speckle filtering of medical ultrasonic images using wavelet and guided filter. Ultrasonics 65:177–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2015.10.005
Zhou W, Bovik AC (2009) Mean squared error: love it or leave it? A new look at signal fidelity measures. IEEE Signal Process Mag 26(1):98–117
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jain, L., Singh, P. (2022). Speckle Reduction in Ultrasound Images Using Hybridization of Wavelet-Based Novel Thresholding Approach with Guided Filter. In: Kumar, N., Shahnaz, C., Kumar, K., Abed Mohammed, M., Raw, R.S. (eds) Advance Concepts of Image Processing and Pattern Recognition. Transactions on Computer Systems and Networks. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9324-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9324-3_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-9323-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-9324-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)