Skip to main content

The Commercial Perspective of Probiotics and Bioremediating Components in Aquaculture Pond Management: A Case Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Prebiotics, Probiotics and Nutraceuticals

Abstract

Four bacterial strains, i.e., FB5, FB7, FB9, and FB12, from the GI tract of Penaeus vannamei and the strain FB19 were isolated from different P. vannamei culture ponds, and their probiotic potentiality and bioremediating capability were studied. Through ribosomal DNA sequence profiling, strains FB5, FB7, FB9, FB12, and FB19 were identified as Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus circulans, Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus licheniformis, and Pseudomonas sp., respectively. The isolated bacterial strains are able to produce different enzymes like amylase, protease, phytases, and beta-galactosidase that are very essential for shrimp growth and cleanup of the pond bottom condition. All the Bacillus strains showed antimicrobial activity against shrimp pathogen like V. harveyi MTCC 7954 and V. vulnificus MTCC 1145, but B. subtilis FB5 highest zones of inhibition against V. harveyi MTCC 7954 and V. vulnificus MTCC 1145 were 15.3 ± 1.11 mm and 16.1 ± 1.34 mm, respectively. The serum bactericidal activities of nonspecific immunity of shrimps were also measured. Heterotrophic nitrifying and aerobic denitrifying B. subtilis FB5 has the ability to remove\( {\mathrm{NH}}_4^{+}-\mathrm{N} \), \( {\mathrm{NO}}_3^{-}-\mathrm{N} \), and \( {\mathrm{NO}}_2^{-}-\mathrm{N} \) at the rate of 76.27, 77.69, and 64.51%, respectively, in synthetic media, whereas aerobic denitrifying Pseudomonas sp. FB19 has the ability to remove 87.14% \( {\mathrm{NO}}_2^{-}-\mathrm{N} \)in synthetic medium. The bacterial consortium was applied in P. vannamei culture pond, and removal of\( {\mathrm{NH}}_4^{+}-\mathrm{N} \), \( {\mathrm{NO}}_3^{-}-\mathrm{N} \), and \( {\mathrm{NO}}_2^{-}-\mathrm{N} \) was also recorded at 86.41, 93.94, and 98.30%, respectively. The results attested that all these Bacillus strains were potential probiotics for P. vannamei and the removal efficiency of toxic nitrogenous pollutants. It was clearly established that this consortium has bioremediating potentiality for sustainable shrimp culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akiyama DM, Dominy WG, Lawrence AL (1991) Penaeid shrimp nutrition for the commercial feed industry: revised. In: Akiyama DM, Tan RKH (eds) Proceedings of the aquaculture feed processing and nutrition workshop. American Soybean Association, Singapore, pp 80–98

    Google Scholar 

  • APHA AWWA WPCF (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st edn. American Public Health Association, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin B, Al-Zahnari AMJ (1988) The effect of antimicrobial compounds of the gastrointestinal microflora of rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri Richardson. J Fish Biol 33:1–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balcazar JL, Rojas-Luna T (2007) Inhibitory activity of probiotic Bacillus subtilis UTM 126 against Vibrio species confers protection against Vibriosis in juvenile shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). Curr Microbiol 55(5):409–412

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barman P, Banerjee A, Bandyopadhyay P, Mondal KC, Das Mohapatra PK (2011) Isolation, identification and molecular characterization of potential probiotic bacterium, Bacillus subtilis PPP 13 from Penaeus monodon. Biotechnol Bioinformatics Bioeng 1:473–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Barman P, Bandyopadhyay P, Mondal KC, Das Mohapatra PK (2015) Water quality improvement of Penaeus monodon culture pond for higher productivity through bioremediation. Acta Biol Szeged 59(2):169–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Barman P, Kati A, Mandal AK, Bandyopadhyay P, Das Mohapatra PK (2016) Biopotentiality of Bacillus cereus PB45 for nitrogenous waste detoxification in ex situ model. Aquac Int. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-016-0105-y

  • Barman P, Bandyopadhyay P, Kati A, Paul T, Mandal AK, Mondal KC, Das Mohapatra PK (2017a) Characterization and strain improvement of aerobic denitrifying EPS producing bacterium Bacillus cereus PB88 for shrimp water quality management. Waste Biomass Valori 9(8):1319–1330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-017-9912-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barman P, Raut S, Sen SK, Shaikh U, Bandyopadhyay P, Das Mohapatra PK (2017b) Effect of a three-component bacterial consortium in white shrimp farming for growth, survival and water quality management. Acta Biol Szeged 61(1):35–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Barman P, Das Mohapatra PK, Bandyopadhyay P (2020) Application of nitrifying and denitrifying bacterial consortium for nitrogenous waste removal from shrimp culture pond for sustainable cultivation. J Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste 24(4):04020041

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd CE (1985) Chemical budgets for channel catfish ponds. Trans Am Fish Soc 114:291–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd CE, Pillai VK (1984) Water quality management in aquaculture. Special Publ. No. 22, 16. Central Marine Research Institute, Cochin

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen P, Li J, Li QX, Wang Y, Li S, Ren T, Wang L (2012) Simultaneous heterotrophic nitrification and aerobic denitrification by bacterium Rhodococcus sp. CPZ24. Bioresour Technol 116:266–270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chien YH (1992) Water quality requirements and management for marine shrimp culture. technical bulletin: marine shrimp pond management: a review. U.S. Wheat Associates, American Soybean Association, Singapore, pp 83–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfray HC, Beddington JJR, Crute IR, Haddad L, Lawrence DJ, Muir F, Pretty J, Robinson S, Thomas SM, Toulmin C (2010) Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327(5967):812–818

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati HK, Chadha BS, Saini HS (2007) Production and characterization of thermostable lkaline phytase from Bacillus laevolacticus isolated from rhizospheric soil. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 34:91–98

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kajita Y, Sakao M, Atsuta S, Kobayashi M (1990) The immunomodulatory effects of levamisole on Rainbow Trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Fish Pathol 25(2):93–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kembhavi AA, Kulkami A (1993) Salt tolerant and thermostable alkaline protease from Bacillus subtilis NCIM No. 64. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 38:83–92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kemigabo C, Abdeltawwab M, Lazaro JW, Sikawa D, Masembe C, Kang’Ombe J (2018) Combined effect of dietary protein and phytases levels on growth performance, feed utilization, and nutrients digestibility of African catfish, Clarias gariepinus (B.), reared in earthen ponds. J Appl Aquac 30(3):211–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim JK, Paik KJ, Cho KS, Nam SW, Park TJ (2005) Aerobic nitrification-denitrification by heterotrophic Bacillus strains. Bioresour Technol 96:1897–1906

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar V, Roy S, Meena DK, Sarkar UK (2016) Application of probiotics in shrimp aquaculture: importance, mechanisms of action, and methods of administration. Rev Fish Sci Aquac 24(4):342–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2016.1193841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonel OS, Olmos SJ (2006) The functional property of Bacillus for shrimp feeds. Food Microbiol 23:519–525

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li P, Zhang S, Liu DL (2005) Study progress of bacterial aerobic denitrification. J Microbiol 25:60–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Li YQ, Zhang HY, Li J, Wang QY, Li ZD (2008) Utilization of liquid oxygen in intensive shrimp aquaculture. Fish Sci 27:401–403

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Magalhaes R, Lopes T, Martins N, Dıaz-Rosales P, Couto A, Pousao-Ferreira P, Oliva-Teles A, Peres H (2016) Carbohydrases supplementation increased nutrient utilization in white seabream (Diplodus sargus) juveniles fed high soybean meal diets. Aquaculture 463:46–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JH (1972) Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Padhi SK, Tripathy S, Sen R, Sinha Mahapatra A, Mohanty S, Maiti NK (2013) Characterisation of heterotrophic nitrifying and aerobic denitrifying Klebsiella pneumonia CF-S9 strain for bioremediation of wastewater. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 78:67–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan N, Padmavathy P, Francis T, Athithian S, Selvaranjithan N (2005) Manual on polyculture of tiger shrimp and in freshwater. Fisheries College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy R (2000) Culture of the tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon (Fabricius) in low saline waters. Master’s thesis, Dept. of Marine Biology, Annamalai Univ

    Google Scholar 

  • Rick W, Stegbauer HP (1974) Methods of enzymatic analysis, 2nd edn. Academic, New York, p 885

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ringø E, Rolf EO, Jensen I, Romero J, Lauzon HL (2014) Application of vaccines and dietary supplements in aquaculture: possibilities and challenges. Rev Fish Biol Fish 24(4):1005–1032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertsen B, Engstad R, Jørgensen JB (1994) ß-glucans as immunostimulants in fish. In: Stolen JS, Fletcher TC (eds) Modulators of fish immune responses, Models for environmental toxicology, biomarkers, immunostimulators, vol 1. SOS Publications, Fair Gaven, pp 83–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez J, Boulo V, Mialhe E, Bachere E (1995) Characterisation of shrimp haemocytes and plasma components by monoclonal antibodies. J Cell Sci 108:1043–1050

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shiau SY (1998) Nutrient requirements of penaeid shrimps. Aquaculture 164:77–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimeno S, Shikata T, Hosokawa H, Masumoto T, Kheyyali D (1997) Metabolic response to feeding rates in common carp, Cyprinus carpio. Aquaculture 151:371–377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sivakumar N, Sundararaman M, Selvakumar G (2012) Probiotic effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus against Vibriosis in juvenile shrimp (Penaeus monodon). Afr J Biotechnol 11(91):15811–15818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnenholzner S, Boyd CE (2000) Managing the accumulation of organic matter deposited on the bottom of shrimp ponds. Do chemical and biological probiotics really work? World Aquac 31:24–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Spotte S (1979) Seawater aquariums: the captive environment. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Su JJ, Yeh KS, Tseng PW (2006) A strain of Pseudomonas sp. isolated from piggery wastewater treatment systems with heterotrophic nitrification capability in Taiwan. Curr Microbiol 53:77–81

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sugita H, Matsuo N, Shibuya K, Deguchi Y (1996) Production of antibacterial substances by intestinal bacteria isolated from coastal crab and fish species. J Mar Biotechnol 4:220–223

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tank PR, Vadher KH, Patel MP (2018) Isolation of probiotic bacteria from gastrointestinal tract of pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei and antibacterial activity of probiotic bacteria against Vibrio spp. J Entomol Zool 6(4):974–978

    Google Scholar 

  • Tharavathy MC (2014) Water quality management. Acta Biol Indica 3(1):536–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang YB, Han JZ (2007) The role of probiotic cell wall hydrophobicity in bioremediation of aquaculture. Aquaculture 269:349–354

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, White BL, Redman RM, Lightner DV (1999) Per os challenge of Litopenaeus vannamei postlarvae and Farfantepenaeus duorarum juveniles with six geographic isolates of white spot syndrome virus. Aquaculture 170:179–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang XP, Wang SM, De-W Z, Zhou LX (2011) Isolation and nitrogen removal characteristics of an aerobic heterotrophic nitrifying–denitrifying bacterium, Bacillus subtilis A1. Bioresour Technol 102:854–862

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao B, He YL, Hughes J, Zhang XF (2010) Heterotrophic nitrogen removal by a newly isolated Acinetobacter calcoaceticus HNR. Bioresour Technol 101:5194–5200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng CC, Wu JW, Jin ZH, Ye ZF, Yang S, Sun YQ, Fei H (2019) Exogenous enzymes as functional additives in finfish aquaculture. Aquac Nutr. https://doi.org/10.1111/anu.12995

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prasenjit Barman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Barman, P., Pal, K., Halder, S.K., Bandyopadhyay, P. (2022). The Commercial Perspective of Probiotics and Bioremediating Components in Aquaculture Pond Management: A Case Study. In: Behera, K.K., Bist, R., Mohanty, S., Bhattacharya, M. (eds) Prebiotics, Probiotics and Nutraceuticals. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8990-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics