Abstract
Housing reconstruction occupies a pre-eminent position when it comes to prioritizing sectors needing attention in the immediate aftermath of a disaster. It should be highlighted, however, that housing reconstruction in isolation of long-term mitigation strategies can achieve limited success. It has to be linked with livelihood restoration, reinforcing market linkages, environmental protection, and catering to needs of diverse sections of society while having an effective grievance redressal system in place.
Case studies across the world have shown that owner-driven housing reconstruction is the most successful model. Owners have knowledge about the cultural construction of the place and their personal as well as community needs. This when combined with knowledge of hazard, exposure to disasters, and structural safety designs can lead to the best outcome.
The physical loss of housing eclipses various significant aspects of daily existences which are impacted negatively. Although housing reconstruction is accorded a higher pedestal in finance allocation, it has a low profile on the humanitarian agenda per se. A house safeguards health, privacy, dignity, and security of individuals. Thus, housing loss inevitably exacerbates vulnerability of the survivor.
Housing reconstruction faces many hurdles; it is strategically sandwiched between short-term relief work and long-term developmental agenda of the state. Post-disaster housing reconstruction may be limited by finance, strict time frames (up to 1.5 years), institutional capacities, and inaccuracies in damage assessment in addition to implementation failures. This paper explores various aspects of housing by taking particular case studies of four states of India: Gujarat, Kerala, Uttarakhand and Odisha.
References
Bello, W. (2008). Review of ‘The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism’ by Naomi Klein (2007). The shock doctrine. Review of International Political Economy, 15(5), 881–891.
Chamlee-Wright, E. (2010). The political economy of hurricane Katrina and community rebound. Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.
Chandra, A., & Acosta, J. (2009). The role of nongovernmental organizations in long-term human recovery after disaster: Reflections from Louisiana four years after hurricane Katrina. In The role of nongovernmental organizations in long-term human recovery after disaster: Reflections from Louisiana four years after hurricane Katrina (pp. 1–14). RAND Corporation. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/op277rc.8
Chatterjee, P. (1986). Nationalist thought and the colonial world: A derivative discourse. Zed.
Chopra, R. (2014). Uttarakhand: Development and ecological sustainability, Oxfam India.
Comerio, M. (2014). Disaster recovery and community renewal: Housing approaches. City, 16(2), 51–68. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/26326883
Edgington, D. (2011). Viewpoint: Reconstruction after natural disasters: The opportunities and constraints facing our cities. The Town Planning Review, 82(6), V–XI. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41300364
EPC, USAID. (2004). Participatory planning guide to post disaster reconstruction.
Félix, D., Monteiro, D., Branco, J., Bologna, R., & Feio, A. (2015). The role of temporary accommodation buildings for post-disaster housing reconstruction. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 30(4), 683–699. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43907357
Ferguson, J. (1994 [1990]). The anti-politics machine: ‘Development’, depoliticisation and bureaucratic power in Lesotho, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Forced Migration Review, 31, 38–39.
Fraser, N. (1995). What’s critical about critical theory? In J. Meehan (Ed.), Feminists read Habermas (p. 45). Routledge.
Fritz, C. E. (1961a). Disaster. In R. Merton & R. Nesbit (Eds.), Contemporary social problems (pp. 651–694). Harcourt Publishers.
Fritz, C. E. (1961b). Disasters and community therapy. National Research Council- National Academy Council.
Gailliard, J.C. (2016). Natural hazard and disaster. In D. Richardson, N. Castree, M. Goodchild, A Kobayashi, W. Liu, & R. Martsona.
GHA, (2015). Report 2015. Retrieved from https://www.globalhumanitarianassistance.org/report/gha-report-2015. Accessed on 7 March 2020.
Goodin, R., Dryzek, J., Honig, B., & Phillips, A. (2011). Overview of political theory. In The Oxford handbook of political science. Oxford University Press. Retrieved August 30, 2019, from https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199604456.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199604456-e-002
GSDMA. (2001). Gujarat earthquake reconstruction and rehabilitation policy. Gujarat, India.
Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.
Ismail, F. Z., Halog, A., & Smith, C. (2017). How sustainable is disaster resilience?: An overview of sustainable construction approach in post-disaster housing reconstruction. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 8(5), 555–572. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-07-2016-0028
Jha, A. et. al (2010). Safer homes, stronger communities: A handbook for reconstructing after natural disasters: The World Bank.
Kälin, W., & Dale, C. H.. (2008). Disaster risk mitigation – why human rights matter.
Kates, J. E., & Boden, M. (1977). Reconstruction following disaster. MIT Press.
Katrina. Southern Economic Journal, 74(2), 363–376.
Kaviraj, S. (1991). On state, society and discourse in India. In J. Manor (Ed.), Rethinking third world politics (pp. 72–99). Longman.
Keraminiyage, K., & Amaratunga, D. (2016). Advantages and limitations of community-based post-disaster housing reconstruction projects. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 7(4), 420–431. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-08-2014-0066
Mishra, P. (2004). The Kutch Earthquake 2001: Recollections, lessons and insights. National Institute of Disaster Management. Accessed from http://www.nidm.gov.in/publications
NIDM (National Institute of Disaster Management). (2019a). Manual on post disaster needs assessment: Volume I and II. Accessed from http://www.nidm.gov.in/publications
NIDM (National Institute of Disaster Management). (2019b). Standard operating procedures PDNA. Accessed from http://www.nidm.gov.in/publications
NIDM (National Institute of Disaster Management). (2019c). Handbook on post disaster needs assessment. Accessed from http://www.nidm.gov.in/publications
Oxfam India. (2014). Uttarakhand: Development and environmental sustainability. Accessed from http://www.oxfam.org
Simpson, E. (2013). The political biography of an earthquake: Aftermath and amnesia in Gujarat, India. Oxford University Press.
UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). (2019). Post disaster needs assessment: Kerala floods and landslides-August 2018. Accessed from http://undp.org
UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Risk Reduction). (2005). Hyogo framework for action 2005–2015: Building resilience of nations and communities to disasters. Accessed from http://www.undrr.org>publications on 7:15 am 25 May 2020.
UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Risk Reduction). (2015). Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. Accessed from http://www.undrr.org>publications on 7:15 am 25 May 2020.
Vijayan, P. (2019, May 15). Resilient rebuilding- lessons from Kerala floods. The Hindu. Accessed from http://www.thehindu.com on 7:10 am, May 15th 2020.
World Bank. (2002). Gujarat emergency earthquake reconstruction project. Accessed from http://worldbank.org/research and publications on 5:08 am, 24 Mar 2020.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Singh, A. (2022). Evaluation of Structural Reconstruction Practices: Housing Reconstruction. In: Singh, A. (eds) International Handbook of Disaster Research. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8800-3_148-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8800-3_148-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-8800-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-8800-3
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences