Skip to main content

Evaluation of Structural Reconstruction Practices: Housing Reconstruction

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
International Handbook of Disaster Research
  • 29 Accesses

Abstract

Housing reconstruction occupies a pre-eminent position when it comes to prioritizing sectors needing attention in the immediate aftermath of a disaster. It should be highlighted, however, that housing reconstruction in isolation of long-term mitigation strategies can achieve limited success. It has to be linked with livelihood restoration, reinforcing market linkages, environmental protection, and catering to needs of diverse sections of society while having an effective grievance redressal system in place.

Case studies across the world have shown that owner-driven housing reconstruction is the most successful model. Owners have knowledge about the cultural construction of the place and their personal as well as community needs. This when combined with knowledge of hazard, exposure to disasters, and structural safety designs can lead to the best outcome.

The physical loss of housing eclipses various significant aspects of daily existences which are impacted negatively. Although housing reconstruction is accorded a higher pedestal in finance allocation, it has a low profile on the humanitarian agenda per se. A house safeguards health, privacy, dignity, and security of individuals. Thus, housing loss inevitably exacerbates vulnerability of the survivor.

Housing reconstruction faces many hurdles; it is strategically sandwiched between short-term relief work and long-term developmental agenda of the state. Post-disaster housing reconstruction may be limited by finance, strict time frames (up to 1.5 years), institutional capacities, and inaccuracies in damage assessment in addition to implementation failures. This paper explores various aspects of housing by taking particular case studies of four states of India: Gujarat, Kerala, Uttarakhand and Odisha.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bello, W. (2008). Review of ‘The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism’ by Naomi Klein (2007). The shock doctrine. Review of International Political Economy, 15(5), 881–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamlee-Wright, E. (2010). The political economy of hurricane Katrina and community rebound. Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, A., & Acosta, J. (2009). The role of nongovernmental organizations in long-term human recovery after disaster: Reflections from Louisiana four years after hurricane Katrina. In The role of nongovernmental organizations in long-term human recovery after disaster: Reflections from Louisiana four years after hurricane Katrina (pp. 1–14). RAND Corporation. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/op277rc.8

  • Chatterjee, P. (1986). Nationalist thought and the colonial world: A derivative discourse. Zed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, R. (2014). Uttarakhand: Development and ecological sustainability, Oxfam India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comerio, M. (2014). Disaster recovery and community renewal: Housing approaches. City, 16(2), 51–68. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/26326883

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgington, D. (2011). Viewpoint: Reconstruction after natural disasters: The opportunities and constraints facing our cities. The Town Planning Review, 82(6), V–XI. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41300364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPC, USAID. (2004). Participatory planning guide to post disaster reconstruction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Félix, D., Monteiro, D., Branco, J., Bologna, R., & Feio, A. (2015). The role of temporary accommodation buildings for post-disaster housing reconstruction. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 30(4), 683–699. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43907357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, J. (1994 [1990]). The anti-politics machine: ‘Development’, depoliticisation and bureaucratic power in Lesotho, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Forced Migration Review, 31, 38–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (1995). What’s critical about critical theory? In J. Meehan (Ed.), Feminists read Habermas (p. 45). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, C. E. (1961a). Disaster. In R. Merton & R. Nesbit (Eds.), Contemporary social problems (pp. 651–694). Harcourt Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, C. E. (1961b). Disasters and community therapy. National Research Council- National Academy Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gailliard, J.C. (2016). Natural hazard and disaster. In D. Richardson, N. Castree, M. Goodchild, A Kobayashi, W. Liu, & R. Martsona.

    Google Scholar 

  • GHA, (2015). Report 2015. Retrieved from https://www.globalhumanitarianassistance.org/report/gha-report-2015. Accessed on 7 March 2020.

  • Goodin, R., Dryzek, J., Honig, B., & Phillips, A. (2011). Overview of political theory. In The Oxford handbook of political science. Oxford University Press. Retrieved August 30, 2019, from https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199604456.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199604456-e-002

  • GSDMA. (2001). Gujarat earthquake reconstruction and rehabilitation policy. Gujarat, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ismail, F. Z., Halog, A., & Smith, C. (2017). How sustainable is disaster resilience?: An overview of sustainable construction approach in post-disaster housing reconstruction. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 8(5), 555–572. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-07-2016-0028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jha, A. et. al (2010). Safer homes, stronger communities: A handbook for reconstructing after natural disasters: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kälin, W., & Dale, C. H.. (2008). Disaster risk mitigation – why human rights matter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kates, J. E., & Boden, M. (1977). Reconstruction following disaster. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katrina. Southern Economic Journal, 74(2), 363–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaviraj, S. (1991). On state, society and discourse in India. In J. Manor (Ed.), Rethinking third world politics (pp. 72–99). Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keraminiyage, K., & Amaratunga, D. (2016). Advantages and limitations of community-based post-disaster housing reconstruction projects. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 7(4), 420–431. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-08-2014-0066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, P. (2004). The Kutch Earthquake 2001: Recollections, lessons and insights. National Institute of Disaster Management. Accessed from http://www.nidm.gov.in/publications

  • NIDM (National Institute of Disaster Management). (2019a). Manual on post disaster needs assessment: Volume I and II. Accessed from http://www.nidm.gov.in/publications

  • NIDM (National Institute of Disaster Management). (2019b). Standard operating procedures PDNA. Accessed from http://www.nidm.gov.in/publications

  • NIDM (National Institute of Disaster Management). (2019c). Handbook on post disaster needs assessment. Accessed from http://www.nidm.gov.in/publications

  • Oxfam India. (2014). Uttarakhand: Development and environmental sustainability. Accessed from http://www.oxfam.org

  • Simpson, E. (2013). The political biography of an earthquake: Aftermath and amnesia in Gujarat, India. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). (2019). Post disaster needs assessment: Kerala floods and landslides-August 2018. Accessed from http://undp.org

  • UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Risk Reduction). (2005). Hyogo framework for action 2005–2015: Building resilience of nations and communities to disasters. Accessed from http://www.undrr.org>publications on 7:15 am 25 May 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Risk Reduction). (2015). Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. Accessed from http://www.undrr.org>publications on 7:15 am 25 May 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vijayan, P. (2019, May 15). Resilient rebuilding- lessons from Kerala floods. The Hindu. Accessed from http://www.thehindu.com on 7:10 am, May 15th 2020.

  • World Bank. (2002). Gujarat emergency earthquake reconstruction project. Accessed from http://worldbank.org/research and publications on 5:08 am, 24 Mar 2020.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Singh, A. (2022). Evaluation of Structural Reconstruction Practices: Housing Reconstruction. In: Singh, A. (eds) International Handbook of Disaster Research. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8800-3_148-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8800-3_148-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-8800-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-8800-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics